Ion implantation damage model for B, BF[sub 2], As, P, and Si in silicon

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myung-Sik Son ◽  
Ho-Jung Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Ion Implantation ◽  
Damage Model ◽  
Implantation Damage

Modeling of Damage Evolution During Ion Implantation Into Silicon: A Monte Carlo Approach

1996 ◽  
Vol 439 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tian ◽  
M. Morris ◽  
S. J. Morris ◽  
B. Obradovic ◽  
A. F. Tasch
Keyword(s):  
Ion Implantation ◽  
Damage Evolution ◽  
Damage Model ◽  
Amorphous Layer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Defect Production ◽  
Implantation Damage ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
First Time

AbstractWe present for the first time a physically based ion implantation damage model which successfully predicts both the as-implanted impurity range profiles and the damage profiles for a wide range of implant conditions for arsenic, boron, phosphorus, and BF2 implants into single-crystal (100) silicon. In addition, the amorphous layer thicknesses predicted by this damage model for high dose implants are also generally in excellent agreement with experiments. This damage model explicitly simulates the defect production and its subsequent evolution into the experimentally observable profiles for the first time. The microscopic mechanisms for damage evolution are further discussed.

Computationally efficient ion implantation damage model: modified Kinchin-Pease model

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geng Wang ◽  
Shiyang Tian ◽  
Michael F. Morris ◽  
Steven J. Morris ◽  
Borna J. Obradovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ion Implantation ◽  
Damage Model ◽  
Computationally Efficient ◽  
Implantation Damage

Modeling of Damage Evolution During Ion Implantation into Silicon: a Monte Carlo Approach

1996 ◽  
Vol 438 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tian ◽  
M. Morris ◽  
S. J. Morris ◽  
B. Obradovic ◽  
A. F. Tasch
Keyword(s):  
Ion Implantation ◽  
Damage Evolution ◽  
Damage Model ◽  
Amorphous Layer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Defect Production ◽  
Implantation Damage ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
First Time

AbstractWe present for the first time a physically based ion implantation damage model which successfully predicts both the as-implanted impurity range profiles and the damage profiles for a wide range of implant conditions for arsenic, boron, phosphorus, and BF2 implants into single-crystal (100) silicon. In addition, the amorphous layer thicknesses predicted by this damage model for high dose implants are also generally in excellent agreement with experiments. This damage model explicitly simulates the defect production and its subsequent evolution into the experimentally observable profiles for the first time. The microscopic mechanisms for damage evolution are further discussed.

Scanned Electron Beam Annealing of Boron-Implanted Diodes

1980 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. O. Yep ◽  
R. T. Fulks ◽  
R. A. Powell
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Ion Implantation ◽  
Reverse Bias ◽  
Carrier Lifetime ◽  
Reverse Current ◽  
Electrical Activation ◽  
Electrical Characteristics ◽  
Low Resolution ◽  
Implantation Damage ◽  
Dopant Redistribution

ABSTRACTSuccessful annealing of p+ n arrays fabricated by ion-implantation of 11B (50 keV, 1 × 1014 cm-2) into Si (100 has been performed using a broadly rastered, low-resolution (0.25-inch diameter) electron beam. A complete 2" wafer could be uniformly annealed in ≃20 sec with high electrical activation (>75%) and small dopant redistribution (≃450 Å). Annealing resulted In p+n junctions characterized by low reverse current (≃4 nAcm-2 at 5V reverse bias) and higher carrier lifetime (80 μsec) over the entire 2" wafer. Based on the electrical characteristics of the diodes, we estimate that the electron beam anneal was able to remove ion implantation damage and leave an ordered substrate to a depth of 5.5 m below the layer junction.

Characterization of Ion Implantation Damage in Capless Annealed GaAs

1983 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kanber ◽  
M. Feng ◽  
J. M. Whelan
Keyword(s):  
Ion Implantation ◽  
Annealing Temperature ◽  
Rutherford Backscattering ◽  
Buffer Layers ◽  
Electrical Activation ◽  
Controlled Atmosphere ◽  
Damage Characteristics ◽  
Implantation Damage ◽  
Implantation Process

ABSTRACTArsenic and argon implantation damage is characterized by Rutherford backscattering in GaAs undoped VPE buffer layers grown on Cr-O doped semi-insulating substrates and capless annealed in a H2 −As4 atmosphere provided by AsH3. The damage detected in the RBS channeled spectra varies as a function of the ion mass, the implant depth and the annealing temperature of the stress-free controlled atmosphere technique. This damage is discussed in terms of the stoichiometric disturbances introduced by the implantation process. The as-implanted and annealed damage characteristics of the Ar and As implants are correlated to the electrical activation characteristics of Si and Se implants in GaAs, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document