Comparison of parameters for Schottky and cold field emission sources

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 2897 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Schwind ◽  
G. Magera ◽  
L. W. Swanson
Keyword(s):  
Field Emission ◽  
Emission Sources

Field emission sources for large area displays

1979 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jules D. Levine
Keyword(s):  
Field Emission ◽  
Emission Sources ◽  
Large Area

Prototypes using metal, carbon fiber and composite field emission sources modulated by a laser beam

2001 ◽  
Vol 89 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Mousa ◽  
M. Brugat ◽  
E.P. Sheshin ◽  
M.J. Hagmann
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Laser Beam ◽  
Field Emission ◽  
Emission Sources ◽  
Composite Field

scholarly journals What is the Dual-Detector FEG SEM, and Why use it?

1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Steve Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Field Emission ◽  
Imaging Systems ◽  
Emission Sources ◽  
The World ◽  
Dual Detector ◽  
User Friendly ◽  
Scanning Electron

The world of scanning electron microscopy seems to spin in such a way that every four years there is a dramatic step forward. Field emission sources (FEG), developed in the late 1960's, started life as a commercial disaster. In spite of the problems, certain manufacturers persisted with the first really user friendly FEG SEM reaching the market in the early 1980s. The FEG has been developed through the 1990's to be, without doubt, the source for SEU. But other advances in SEM performance have added to the instrument's performance, the most recent dramatic step being the introduction of semi-inlens imaging, a technique based upon 1980's dual detector imaging systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document