scholarly journals Translation and reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the revised Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2)

PAIN RESEARCH ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Maruo ◽  
Aya Nakae ◽  
Lynn Maeda ◽  
Kayoko Takahashi-Narita ◽  
Shayn Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Pain Questionnaire

scholarly journals Pain Questionnaire Development Focusing on Cross-Cultural Equivalence to the Original Questionnaire: The Japanese Version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire

Pain Medicine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuyuki Arimura ◽  
Masako Hosoi ◽  
Yoshihiro Tsukiyama ◽  
Toshiyuki Yoshida ◽  
Daiki Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Questionnaire Development ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Pain Questionnaire

scholarly journals The McGill Pain Questionnaire - Japanese Version, Reconsidered: Confirming the Reliability and Validity

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoru Hasegawa ◽  
Suguru Hattori ◽  
Keiji Ishizaki ◽  
Shosuke Suzuki ◽  
Fumio Goto
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Pain Questionnaire

BACKGROUND:The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is one of the most widely used instruments in the world to evaluate patients with chronic pain. However, differences in languages and cultural backgrounds have hindered its standardization in Japan.OBJECTIVE:To standardize the MPQ in Japan.DESIGN:The reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the MPQ (JMPQ) were examined using a translation-based methodology, which followed a format similar to the original MPQ.SETTING:Multidisciplinary pain treatment centre of a university hospital in Japan.PATIENTS:Consecutive out-patients (n=152) with chronic pain.METHODS:Each patient completed the JMPQ, other pain rating scales (visual analogue scale, verbal rating scale, numerical rating scale) and the state-trait anxiety inventory. A subset of these patients (n=40) were tested again two weeks later.RESULTS:Acceptable levels of reliability and validity of the JMPQ, and independence of the JMPQ subscales from other pain rating scales were confirmed by principal component analysis. Chronic pain patients did not show marked levels of anxiety as might have been expected.CONCLUSIONS:The findings suggest that the JMPQ possesses sufficient merits as a pain rating scale from the standpoint of its reliability and validity. Furthermore, it is suggested that the JMPQ can be used to measure qualitative aspects of pain transcending differences in linguistic characteristics.

Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire--Japanese Version

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuyuki Arimura ◽  
Masako Hosoi ◽  
Yoshihiro Tsukiyama ◽  
Toshiyuki Yoshida ◽  
Daiki Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Pain Questionnaire

McGill Pain Questionnaire-2--Short Form; Sinhala Version

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirosha P. Edirisinghe ◽  
Thamasi R. Makuloluwa ◽  
Thamara D. Amarasekara ◽  
Christine S. E. Goonewardena
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Pain Questionnaire
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document