scholarly journals The efficacy and safety of autologous conditioned serum (ACS) injections compared with betamethasone and placebo injections in the treatment of chronic shoulder joint pain due to supraspinatus tendinopathy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nemanja Damjanov ◽  
Branko Barac ◽  
Jelena Colic ◽  
Vladan Stevanovic ◽  
Ana Zekovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Autologous Blood ◽  
Supraspinatus Tendon ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Muscle Injuries ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Autologous Conditioned Serum

Aims: Autologous conditioned serum (ACS; marketed as Orthokine®) is an autologous blood product that has previously shown efficacy in treatment of joint osteoarthritis, spinal radiculopathy, tendon and muscle injuries in randomized controlled trials. In this 24-week, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the efficacy and safety of ACS with glucocorticoid (betamethasone) injections in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy patients.Material and methods: Thirty-two patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy were enrolled in the study. The ACS group received four ACS injections once weekly over four weeks and the glucocorticoid group received three betamethasone injections once weekly over three weeks with a placebo (saline) injection at week 4 into the enthesis and paratenon of the supraspinatus tendon. Study endpoints were pain intensity (VAS) and Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) assessed at weeks 0, 4 and 24.Results: Shoulder pain intensity improved after 4 weeks and significantly improved after 24 weeks in patients treated with ACS compared with those treated with glucocorticoids (pain intensity week 4: ACS=22.0, glucocorticoid=32.0; week 24: ACS=15.0, glucocorticoid=40.0). CSS improved to a similar extent in both groups after 4 weeks. After 24 weeks, ACS patients exhibited significantly greater CSS improvements than glucocorticoid patients. Adverse events (n=8) were reported in betamethasone patients.Conclusions: Compared with betamethasone, ACS therapy improved joint function and reduced shoulder pain more effectively after 4 weeks of treatment; these improvements were sustained to week 24. Combined with its favorable safety profile, ACS appears to be a more effective treatment than glucocorticoids and could enhance the quality of life in patients with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy

Efficacy and Safety of Acetaminophen and Naproxen in the Treatment of Tension-Type Headache. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Cephalalgia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 740-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Prior ◽  
KM Cooper ◽  
LG May ◽  
DL Bowen
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Intensity Difference ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maximum Pain ◽  
Type Headache

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of single doses of acetaminophen (paracetamol) 1000 mg and naproxen 375 mg vs. placebo over a six-hour period in the treatment of tension-type headache. The treatments were compared in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled study. Efficacy was evaluated using four standard analgesic summary endpoints (the sum of pain intensity differences from baseline, the maximum pain intensity from baseline, the sum of the pain relief scores, and the maximum pain relief score). Both acetaminophen 1000 mg and naproxen 375 mg were significantly superior to placebo ( P ≤ 0.009 and P ≤ 0.021, respectively) but not significantly different from each other ( P ≥ 0.498) for these four endpoints. For example, the mean sum of pain intensity differences from baseline was 9.14 ± 0.34 for acetaminophen 1000 mg and 8.81 ± 0.35 for naproxen 375 mg compared with 7.42 ± 0.34 for placebo. Other efficacy endpoints (percentage of responders (pain reduced to none) at two hours, onset of meaningful relief, time to use of rescue medication and subject's overall impression of study medication) showed similar trends. A significantly larger mean pain intensity difference from baseline was observed for acetaminophen 1000 mg (1.13) than for naproxen 375 mg (0.95) ( P = 0.036) at one hour after treatment. There was no significant difference among the treatment groups in the incidence of adverse events ( P = 0.730). In summary, the results of this well-controlled, double-blind study demonstrate that over-the-counter acetaminophen 1000 mg and prescription naproxen 375 mg are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of tough (moderate-to-severe) tension-type headache.

Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Intravenous Enalaprilat Efficacy and Safety in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

Circulation ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 1316-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Djillali Annane ◽  
Eric Bellissant ◽  
Eric Pussard ◽  
Roland Asmar ◽  
Florence Lacombe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

485 Efficacy and Safety of Once- and Twice-Nightly Dosing of Lower-Sodium Oxybate in Adults With Idiopathic Hypersomnia

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A191-A192
Author(s):  
Isabelle Arnulf ◽  
Anne Marie Morse ◽  
Patricia Chandler ◽  
Rupa Parvataneni ◽  
Dan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Oxybate ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Global Impression ◽  
Idiopathic Hypersomnia ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Global Impression Of Change

Abstract Introduction Idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) is a rare central hypersomnolence disorder. In a randomized, controlled study of lower-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav™) in adults with IH (NCT03533114), significant differences for LXB compared with placebo were observed in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; primary efficacy endpoint), self-reported Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc), and IH Severity Scale (IHSS; key secondary endpoints). In this clinical study, investigators were permitted to initiate LXB dosing on a once-nightly or twice-nightly regimen. Methods Eligible participants aged 18–75 years began LXB treatment, administered once or twice nightly during an open-label treatment/titration and optimization period (OLTTOP; 10–14 weeks); dose amount/regimen could be adjusted during this period. Participants next entered a 2-week, open-label, stable-dose period (SDP), then were randomized to placebo or to continue LXB treatment during a 2-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period (DBRWP). P values are nominal for this exploratory analysis. Results Of 154 enrolled participants, 40 (26%) initiated LXB treatment on a once-nightly regimen. In the efficacy population (n=115), 27 participants were on a once-nightly regimen during SDP (48.1% of whom initiated treatment once nightly during OLTTOP) and 88 participants were on a twice-nightly regimen during SDP (86.4% of whom initiated treatment twice nightly during OLTTOP). During SDP, median (min, max) LXB total dose was 4.5 (2.5, 6) g/night (once-nightly group) and 7.5 (4.5, 9) g/night (twice-nightly group). ESS scores worsened in participants randomized to placebo vs those continuing LXB in the once-nightly group (n=11 and n=15, respectively; LS mean difference [95% CI]: −4.93 [−7.41, −2.46]; P=0.0004) and twice-nightly group (n=47 and n=41, respectively; LS mean difference [95% CI]: −7.44 [−9.15, −5.72]; P<0.0001). Worsening was also observed in PGIc (once-nightly: 81.8% [placebo] vs 26.7% [LXB]; P=0.0077; twice-nightly: 89.4% [placebo] vs 19.5% [LXB]; P<0.0001) and IHSS score (estimated median difference [95% CI], once-nightly: −9.00 [−16.0, −3.0]; P=0.0028; twice-nightly: −12.00 [−15.0, −8.0]; P<0.0001). Common adverse events included nausea (21.4%), headache (16.2%), anxiety (14.9%), dizziness (11.7%), insomnia (11.7%), and vomiting (10.4%). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of LXB in IH were demonstrated for both once-nightly and twice-nightly regimens. The majority of participants initiated and remained on a twice-nightly regimen. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals

scholarly journals Olokizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin 6, in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by methotrexate: efficacy and safety results of a randomised controlled phase III study

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-219876
Author(s):  
Evgeniy Nasonov ◽  
Saeed Fatenejad ◽  
Eugen Feist ◽  
Mariana Ivanova ◽  
Elena Korneva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acr20 Response

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX).MethodsIn this 24-week multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneously administered OKZ 64 mg once every 2 weeks, OKZ 64 mg once every 4 weeks, or placebo plus MTX. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 12. The secondary efficacy endpoints included percentage of subjects achieving Disease Activity Score 28-joint count based on C reactive protein <3.2, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at week 12, ACR50 response and Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤2.8 at week 24. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed throughout the study.ResultsA total of 428 patients were randomised. ACR20 responses were more frequent with OKZ every 2 weeks (63.6%) and OKZ every 4 weeks (70.4%) than placebo (25.9%) (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). There were significant differences in all secondary efficacy endpoints between OKZ-treated arms and placebo. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were reported by more patients in the OKZ groups compared with placebo. Infections were the most common TESAEs. No subjects developed neutralising antidrug antibodies.ConclusionsTreatment with OKZ was associated with significant improvement in signs, symptoms and physical function of rheumatoid arthritis without discernible differences between the two regimens. Safety was as expected for this class of agents. Low immunogenicity was observed.Trial registration numberNCT02760368.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document