Effect of Variable Temperature on the Fatigue Life and Crack Growth Rates of Austenitic Stainless Steels in PWR Coolant Environments

Author(s):  
N. Platts ◽  
P. Gill ◽  
S. Cruchley ◽  
E. Grieveson ◽  
M. Twite

The Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) primary coolant environment is known both to significantly reduce the fatigue life of austenitic stainless steels and to lead to enhanced fatigue crack propagation rates. Relationships for the impact of the PWR coolant environment on fatigue life have been presented in NUREG/CR-6909 using an environmental fatigue correction factor (Fen), which is a function of temperature. Fatigue crack growth behavior has been codified in ASME Code Case N-809 in terms of parameters such as rise time, stress intensity factor, load ratio and temperature. However, plant performance suggests that the application of these predicted environmental effects using current assessment procedures for fatigue for plant transient loading may be unduly pessimistic. One potential reason for this over-conservatism is thought to be that, although the majority of plant design transients result from variations in thermal loading, most available data are derived from isothermal testing. For the calculation of fatigue initiation life, NUREG/CR-6909 gives guidance on the effective temperature to be used in assessments of thermal transients. Recent results from Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue (TMF) testing on stainless steels in PWR coolant show that this guidance is conservative for out-of-phase cycling of temperature and loading, and potentially non-conservative for in-phase thermal loading. In contrast, code case N-809 gives no guidance on the effective temperature for fatigue crack growth assessments, resulting in maximum temperatures frequently being adopted for assessments of thermal transients. There is therefore a need for a clearer understanding of the impact of variable temperatures during transients on the predicted levels of environmental fatigue. This paper describes test facilities developed to permit measurements of both thermo-mechanical fatigue life and fatigue crack growth rates in pressurized water reactor environments. Initial test results obtained using these facilities are presented. The fatigue life data have been generated for a range of applied strain amplitudes, 0.45% to 1%, using temperature cycling between 100°C and 300°C. These data, for both in- and out-of-phase temperature and loading, are compared to the predictions of the “weighted Fen” model which is detailed in a separate paper, PVP2017-66030. Similarly, crack growth rate data generated for cycles between 140°C and 280°C are presented and comparisons made against the predictions of the “weighted K rate” (WKR) method detailed in paper PVP2017-65645. In both cases, the test results suggest that the weighted models are able to provide good predictions of an effective temperature to be used in fatigue assessment methods, which offer a significant improvement in the treatment of variable temperatures compared to current assessment practice.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary L. Stevens

Abstract As part of the development of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Case N-809 [1], a series of sample calculations were performed to gain experience in using the Code Case methods and to determine the impact on a typical application. Specifically, the application of N-809 in a fatigue crack growth analysis was evaluated for a large diameter austenitic pipe in a pressurized water reactor coolant system main loop using the current analytical evaluation procedures in Appendix C of Section XI of the ASME Code [2]. The same example problem was previously used to evaluate the reference fatigue crack growth curves during the development of N-809, as well as to compare N-809 methods to similar methods adopted by the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. The previous example problem used to evaluate N-809 during its development was embellished and has been used to evaluate additional proposed ASME Code changes. For example, the Electric Power Research Institute investigated possible improvements to ASME Code, Section XI, Nonmandatory Appendix L [3], and the previous N-809 example problem formed the basis for flaw tolerance calculations to evaluate those proposed improvements [4]. In addition, the ASME Code Section XI, Working Group on Flaw Evaluation Reference Curves continues to evaluate additional research data and related improvements to N-809 and other fatigue crack growth rate methods. As a part of these Code investigations, EPRI performed calculations for the Appendix L flaw tolerance sample problem using three international codes and standards to evaluate fatigue crack growth (da/dN) curves for PWR environments: (1) ASME Code Case N-809, (2) JSME Code methods [5], and (3) the French RSE-M method [6]. The results of these comparative calculations are presented and discussed in this paper.


Author(s):  
Yuichiro Nomura ◽  
Kazuya Tsutsumi ◽  
Hiroshi Kanasaki ◽  
Naoki Chigusa ◽  
Kazuhiro Jotaki ◽  
...  

Although reference fatigue crack growth curves for austenitic stainless steels in air environments and boiling water reactor (BWR) environments were prescribed in JSME S NA1-2002, similar curves for pressurized water reactors (PWR) were not prescribed. In order to propose the reference curve in PWR environment, fatigue tests of austenitic stainless steels in simulated PWR primary water environment were carried out. According to the procedure to determine the reference fatigue crack growth curve of BWR, which of PWR is proposed. The reference fatigue crack growth curve in PWR environment have been determines as a function of stress intensity factor range, Temperature, load rising time and stress ratio.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell C. Cipolla ◽  
Warren H. Bamford ◽  
Kiminobu Hojo ◽  
Yuichiro Nomura

Abstract Reference fatigue crack growth curves for austenitic stainless steels exposed to pressurized water reactor environments have been available in the ASME Code, Section XI in their present form with the publication of Code Case N-809 in Supplement 2 to the 2015 Code Edition. The reference curves are dependent on temperature, loading rate (loading rise time), mean stress (R-ratio), and cyclic stress intensity factor range (ΔK), which are all contained in the model. Since the first implementation of this Code Case, additional data have become available, and the purpose of this paper is to provide the technical basis for revision of the Code Case. Changes have been made in three areas: R-ratio behavior, threshold for crack growth (ΔKth), and crack growth rate dependence on ΔK. In addition, the temperature model was revisited to study the temperature effects for T < 150°C, where the current model predicts an increase in da/dN based on limited test data at about 100°C (200°F). At this point, the current temperature model is considered conservative and no change is proposed in this revision to N-809. The R-ratio model has been revised for both high and low carbon stainless steels, a significant improvement over the original procedures. Perhaps the most important revision is in the area of the threshold for the initiation of fatigue crack growth; such data are difficult to obtain, and the previous model was very conservative. Finally, the crack growth exponent was revised slightly to make it consistent with the regression analysis of the original data.


Author(s):  
Russell C. Cipolla ◽  
Warren H. Bamford

Reference fatigue crack growth curves for austenitic stainless steels in pressurized water reactor environments have been proposed for Section XI flaw evaluation applications. The reference curves are dependent on temperature, loading rate, mean stress, and cyclic stress range, which are all contained in the model. This paper presents the technical basis for the curves, which is based on various research and industry sources. The reference curves for unirradiated material are implemented through Code Case N-809. Applications for N-809 include analytical evaluations for flaw growth to Appendix C and Appendix L of ASME Section XI where environmental effects are important in establishing the service life and inspection interval for austenitic stainless steel piping and components.


Author(s):  
Jennifer Borg ◽  
Norman Platts ◽  
Peter Gill ◽  
Jonathan Mann ◽  
Chris Currie

Abstract Laboratory data have indicated that light water reactor environments can significantly reduce the fatigue life and crack growth performance of austenitic stainless steels. These environmental effects have been codified into design procedures and documents such as NUREG/CR-6909 Rev 1 (fatigue life) and ASME code case N-809 (crack growth). However, there is considered to be significant conservatism in these methods when applied to plant relevant loadings. The Weighted K-Rate, WKR, method was initially developed by J. Emslie et.al (PVP2016-63497) to address the influence of waveform shape as one of the potential sources of the over-conservatism in code case N-809. This method was found to significantly reduce the over-conservatism associated with ASME code case N-809. However, this method was based solely on isothermal data, and was shown to also retain significant over-conservatism, especially for out-of-phase non-isothermal waveforms typical of many thermally induced loading transients. The WKR method was further evolved into the Weighted Temperature and K-rate (WTKR) method, by Currie et.al (PVP2019-93855), further updated by Mann et.al (PVP2020-21585), which partitions the damage across the loading cycle, under non-isothermal conditions, and has been shown to significantly reduce the perceived over-conservatism associated with ASME code case N-809 when applied to many plant-relevant loading waveforms. This paper describes work that was done to investigate the impact of non-isothermal temperature / loading waveforms, and forms the bulk of non-isothermal data from which the WTKR method was derived. The data presented in this paper indicate that for out-of-phase transient loading (typical of most thermally induced plant loadings), and simple isothermal loading at low temperatures and longer rise times, the WTKR method provides a more accurate prediction of fatigue crack growth rates than the application of ASME code case N-809.


Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 475
Author(s):  
Lukáš Trávníček ◽  
Ivo Kuběna ◽  
Veronika Mazánová ◽  
Tomáš Vojtek ◽  
Jaroslav Polák ◽  
...  

In this work two approaches to the description of short fatigue crack growth rate under large-scale yielding condition were comprehensively tested: (i) plastic component of the J-integral and (ii) Polák model of crack propagation. The ability to predict residual fatigue life of bodies with short initial cracks was studied for stainless steels Sanicro 25 and 304L. Despite their coarse microstructure and very different cyclic stress–strain response, the employed continuum mechanics models were found to give satisfactory results. Finite element modeling was used to determine the J-integrals and to simulate the evolution of crack front shapes, which corresponded to the real cracks observed on the fracture surfaces of the specimens. Residual fatigue lives estimated by these models were in good agreement with the number of cycles to failure of individual test specimens strained at various total strain amplitudes. Moreover, the crack growth rates of both investigated materials fell onto the same curve that was previously obtained for other steels with different properties. Such a “master curve” was achieved using the plastic part of J-integral and it has the potential of being an advantageous tool to model the fatigue crack propagation under large-scale yielding regime without a need of any additional experimental data.


1999 ◽  
Vol 65 (634) ◽  
pp. 1343-1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisashi HIRUKAWA ◽  
Saburo MATSUOKA ◽  
Etsuo TAKEUCHI ◽  
Takahito OMURA ◽  
Koji YAMAGUCHI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document