Estimation of Q345R Fracture Toughness Based on Master Curve

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lele Gui ◽  
Tong Xu ◽  
Binan Shou ◽  
Haiyang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Charpy Impact ◽  
Tensile Tests ◽  
Empirical Formulas ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Temperature Method ◽  
Single Temperature ◽  
Curve Method

1T CT specimens are used to evaluate the fracture toughness of Chinese Q345R steel in the ductile-brittle transition regime by Master Curve method. Tensile tests, Charpy impact tests and drop-weight tests of Q345R steel are also carried out to get the ductile-brittleness transition temperature and nil-ductility transition temperature. Master Curves are compared with the empirical formulas adopted in ASME, API and BS codes. Results show that the reference temperature T0 values derived from single-temperature and multi-temperature method by 1T specimen are basically consistent. Master Curve can well envelop the fracture toughness and temperature curves derived from the empirical formulas, and is more economic and flexible than the K1C curve with sufficient conservation.

Alternative RTNDT for Linde 80 Weld Materials

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Yoon ◽  
J. B. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Curve Method

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code provides fracture toughness curves of ferritic pressure vessel steels that are indexed by a reference temperature for nil ductility transition (RTNDT). The ASME Code also prescribes how to determine RTNDT. The B&W Owners Group has reactor pressure vessels that were fabricated by Babcock & Wilcox using Linde 80 flux. These vessels have welds called Linde 80 welds. The RTNDT values of the Linde 80 welds are of great interest to the B&W Owners Group. These RTNDT values are used in compliance of the NRC regulations regarding the PTS screening criteria and plant pressure-temperature limits for operation of nuclear power plants. A generic RTNDT value for the Linde 80 welds as a group was established by the NRC, using an average of more than 70 RTNDT values. Emergence of the Master Curve method enabled the industry to revisit the validity issue surrounding RTNDT determination methods. T0 indicates that the dropweight test based TNDT is a better index than Charpy transition temperature based index, at least for the RTNDT of unirradiated Linde 80 welds. An alternative generic RTNDT is presented in this paper using the T0 data obtained by fracture toughness tests in the brittle-to-ductile transition temperature range, in accordance with the ASTM E1921 standard.

Prediction of Fracture Toughness for WWER RPV Integrity Assessment on the Basis of the Unified Curve Approach and Surveillance Specimens Testing

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Margolin ◽  
Victoria Shvetsova ◽  
Alexander Gulenko ◽  
Valentin Fomenko
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Present Report ◽  
Temperature Shift ◽  
Curve Shape ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Unified Curve ◽  
Surveillance Specimens

For construction of the fracture toughness temperature curve that may be used for WWER RPV integrity assessment on the basis of tests of cracked surveillance specimens, the issues have to be solved as follows. First of all, it is important to determine how fracture toughness varies as a function of temperature, and how the fracture toughness vs. temperature dependence, KJC(T), changes with in-service material degradation due to neutron irradiation. These variations of KJC(T) curve are known to be the shift of KJC(T) curve to higher temperature range and change in the KJC(T) curve shape. At present, two advanced engineering methods are known that allow the prediction of KJC(T) curve on the basis of small-size fracture toughness specimens (for example, pre-cracked Charpy specimens), namely, the Master Curve and the Unified Curve methods. Procedures of test result treatment for the Master Curve and the Unified Curve are very similar. The Master Curve method uses the lateral temperature shift condition and, therefore, does not describe possible change in the KJC(T) curve shape. The Unified Curve method has an advantage as compared with the Master Curve as the Unified Curve describes a variation of the KJC(T) curve shape when degree of embrittlement increases. This advantage becomes important for RPV integrity assessment when the reference KJC(T) curve is recalculated to the crack front length of the postulated flaw that is considerable larger than thickness of surveillance specimens. Application of the KJC(T) curve determined from test results of cracked surveillance specimens to RPV integrity assessment requires also to introduce some margins. These margins have to take into account the type and number of tested specimens and the uncertainty connected with spatial non-homogeneity of RPV materials. Indeed, there is sufficient number of experimental data showing variability in fracture toughness for various parts of RPV. Therefore, situation is possible when the material properties near the postulated flaw will be worse than the properties of surveillance specimens. In the present report, advanced approaches are considered for prediction of fracture toughness for WWER RPV integrity assessment that allow one: • to construct the KJC(T) curve for irradiated RPV steels with any degree of embrittlement; • to provide transferability of fracture toughness data from cracked surveillance specimens to calculation of resistance to brittle fracture of RPV with a postulated flaw.

Fracture Toughness Transferability Study Between the Master Curve Method and a Pressure Vessel Nozzle Using Local Approach

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anssi Laukkanen ◽  
Pekka Nevasmaa ◽  
Heikki Keina¨nen ◽  
Kim Wallin
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Reference Temperature ◽  
Cleavage Crack ◽  
Local Approach ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Constitutive Parameters

Local approach methods are to greater extent used in structural integrity evaluation, in particular with respect to initiation of an unstable cleavage crack. However, local approach methods have had a tendency to be considered as methodologies with ‘qualitative’ potential, rather than quantitative usage in realistic analyses where lengthy and in some cases ambiguous calibration of local approach parameters is not feasible. As such, studies need to be conducted to illustrate the usability of local approach methods in structural integrity analyses and improve upon the transferability of their intrinsic, material like, constitutive parameters. Improvements of this kind can be attained by constructing improved models utilizing state of the art numerical simulation methods and presenting consistent calibration methodologies for the constitutive parameters. The current study investigates the performance of a modified Beremin model by comparing integrity evaluation results of the local approach model to those attained by using the constraint corrected Master Curve methodology. Current investigation applies the Master Curve method in conjunction with the T-stress correction of the reference temperature and a modified Beremin model to an assessment of a three-dimensional pressure vessel nozzle in a spherical vessel end. The material information for the study is extracted from the ‘Euro-Curve’ ductile to brittle transition region fracture toughness round robin test program. The experimental results are used to determine the Master Curve reference temperature and calibrate local approach parameters. The values are then used to determine the cumulative failure probability of cleavage crack initiation in the model structure. The results illustrate that the Master Curve results with the constraint correction are to some extent more conservative than the results attained using local approach. The used methodologies support each other and indicate that with the applied local approach and Master Curve procedures reliable estimates of structural integrity can be attained for complex material behavior and structural geometries.

Influence of Microstructural Variation in Thick Section Steels on the Characterisation of Fracture Toughness Using Sub-Size Specimens

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippa Moore ◽  
Borislava Yordanova ◽  
Yong Lu ◽  
Yin Jin Janin
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Plate Thickness ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Steel Plates ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Sampling Locations ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Thick Material

Abstract The challenges of performing full-thickness fracture toughness tests on steel plates of 100mm thickness and greater means that the use of sub-size specimens is desirable. In this work, 100mm thick parent plate of S690 high strength steel was characterised using SENB fracture toughness specimens with thickness of 12mm, 25mm, 50mm and 100mm. Sub-size specimens were extracted at two different locations through the plate thickness; mid-wall and quarter wall. Sufficient specimens were tested to apply the Master Curve method in ASTM E1921 to predict the behaviour of 100mm thick material from each set of sub-size specimens. The through-thickness microstructural variation in these heavy-wall steel plates meant that significantly different predictions of full-thickness fracture toughness were obtained from the two sampling locations. However, when sampled from the mid-wall location, sub-size specimens down to 25mm thick were able to conservatively predict full-thickness fracture toughness using Master Curve methods.

Adjustments to Master Curve Methodology and Development of Fracture Toughness Estimation

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Kulka
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Driving Force ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Structural Components ◽  
Fracture Test ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Constraint Effects

In conventional fracture mechanics assessments, there is often an inadequate treatment of in-plane constraint effects on the apparent toughness of structural components, leading to significant conservatism. Modifications to the Master Curve method, to account for these effects, have previously been suggested. A study of these proposed modifications has identified that less conservative toughness estimates could be made from the analysis of fracture mechanics test specimens. An approach has been developed for allowing a comparison of a variation of fracture toughness values throughout a component, to a variation of the localised effective driving force. Cracked-body finite element analysis has been used to assess fracture test specimens with varying levels of in-plane constraint, to provide fracture mechanics data for use with the approach that has been developed.

Investigation of Mechanical Properties and Ductile-Brittle Transition Behaviors of SA738Gr.B Steel Used as Reactor Containment

2019 ◽  
Vol 795 ◽  
pp. 66-73
Author(s):  
Ya Lin Zhang ◽  
Hu Hui
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Steel Plate ◽  
Reference Temperature ◽  
Impact Performance ◽  
Brittle Transition ◽  
Containment Vessel ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Nuclear Containment ◽  
Curve Method

The low temperature tensile properties, Charpy-V notch impact performance and fracture toughness of SA738Gr.B steel plate for domestic CAP1400 containment vessel were tested. On this basis, the reference temperature T0 of the master curve method was obtained. The fracture toughness distribution of the steel in the whole ductile-brittle transition zone is predicted and its applicability is verified by the theoretical basis of the master curve method. The results show that the reference temperature of SA738Gr.B steel master curve method is-123.6 °C. The master curve method is appropriate for SA738Gr.B steel with domestic nuclear containment vessel.

Correlations Between Charpy V-Notch Impact Energy and Fracture Toughness of Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Steels

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meifang Yu ◽  
Zhen Luo ◽  
Y. J. Chao
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Region ◽  
Test Data ◽  
Impact Energy ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Reference Temperature ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Reactor Pressure ◽  
Actual Test

Both Charpy V-notch (CVN) impact energy and fracture toughness are parameters reflecting toughness of the material. Charpy tests are however easy to perform compared to standard fracture toughness tests, especially when the material is irradiated and quantity is limited. Correlations between the two parameters are therefore of great significance, especially for reactor pressure vessel (RPV) structural integrity assessment. In this paper, correlations between CVN impact energy and fracture toughness of three commonly used RPV steels, namely Chinese A508-3 steel, USA A533B steel, Euro 20MnMoNi55 steel, are investigated with two methods. One method applies a direct conversion using empirical formulas and the other adopts the Master Curve method. It is found that when the empirical formula is used, the difference between the predicted fracture toughness (from the CVN impact energy) and actual test data is relatively small in upper shelf, lower shelf and the bottom of transition region, while relatively large in other parts of the transition region. When the Master Curve method is adopted, whether the reference temperature T0 is estimated through temperature at 28J or 41J CVN impact energy, the predicted fracture toughness values of the three steels are consistent with actual test data. The reference temperature T0 is also estimated through the IGC-parameter correlation and through a combination of empirical formula and multi-temperature method. Both procedures show excellent agreement with test results. The mean value of T0 estimated from T28J, T41J, IGC-parameters and the combination method is denoted by TQ-ave and is then used as the final reference temperature T0 for the Master Curve determination. Accuracy of TQ-ave (and therefore the Master Curve method) is demonstrated by comparison with actual test data of the three RPV steels. It is concluded that Master Curve method provides a reliable procedure for predicting fracture toughness in the transition region utilizing limited CVN impact energy data from open literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document