scholarly journals 3D Micro-Macro Fluid-Structure Model of Pressure Relief Valve Leak Tightness

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali A. Anwar ◽  
William Dempster ◽  
Yevgen Gorash
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Fluid Dynamic ◽  
Numerical Approach ◽  
Pressure Relief Valve ◽  
Original Design ◽  
Relief Valve ◽  
Pressure Relief ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Spring Force ◽  
Leak Tightness

Controlling and assessing the leak tightness of a Pressure Relief Valve (PRV) has been a challenge since the original design of the product. With more stringent demands from the nuclear power industry for leakproof PRV’s, closer to the set point, there has been a drive by both industry and academia for a better design method for many known metal-to-metal contacting seal/surface problems. This paper outlines a numerical modelling strategy drawn from industry experience and metrology measurements and investigates the effects of lapping and surface finish on leakage rate. Key influencing parameters of surface form, waviness and roughness are incorporated in the analysis. The numerical approach requires efficient coupling of a non-linear structural Finite Element Analysis (FEA) with a Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) solver. This allows the examination of the relationship between deformation of the contacting surfaces, based on the applied spring force, and the resulting micro-flow of gas through any available gaps and the overall leakage to be found. The API527 Seat Tightness methodology is followed to allow leakage rates to be measured and the computational model to be preliminarily validated. Using this model, engineers can adjust and optimise the design of pressure relief valves to find the minimal leakage condition for a given configuration. In addition, the numerical approach can potentially be applied to other metal-to-metal contacting surface components, such as flanges with metal gaskets, and help eliminate leakage.

scholarly journals Study of mechanical aspects of leak tightness in a pressure relief valve using advanced FE-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 61-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yevgen Gorash ◽  
William Dempster ◽  
William D. Nicholls ◽  
Robert Hamilton ◽  
Ali A. Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Fe Analysis ◽  
Pressure Relief Valve ◽  
Relief Valve ◽  
Pressure Relief ◽  
Leak Tightness

State-of-the-Art Review of Pressure Relief Valve Design, Testing and Modeling

1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Petherick ◽  
A. M. Birk
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Characteristics ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Pressure Relief Valve ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Relief Valve ◽  
Pressure Relief

It is well known that the response of a rail tank car to exterior heating (e.g., fire engulfment) is significantly affected by the operating characteristics of the pressure relief valve (PRV). If the valve jams or fails in some way, it can lead to a violent vessel rupture; therefore, PRV failure modes and mechanisms must be understood. This paper investigates the studies which have been conducted in the area of PRV technology. The original focus of the paper was to conduct a literature search to find the state-of-the-art for the PRV’s which are presently installed on railway tank cars, highway tankers, and stationary LPG storage vessels. When few papers were found which had concentrated on this particular topic, the authors continued the search by considering both the nuclear power and chemical processing industries, where similar technologies are found. The results of the literature search suggest that the PRV’s currently installed on tank cars and highway tankers are based on designs more than 30 yr old. Controlled fire tests and industry’s maintenance programs suggest that PRV’s could be improved. Most experimental studies of PRV’s have concentrated on flow visualization techniques and have not considered PRV dynamic characteristics. The lack of understanding of valve dynamic characteristics has slowed the development of improved PRV dynamic computer models.

Optimization of Operation Parameters for Direct Spring Loaded Pressure Relief Valve in a Pipeline System

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunjun Kim ◽  
Sanghyun Kim ◽  
Youngman Kim ◽  
Jonghwan Kim
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Relief Valve ◽  
Pipeline System ◽  
Relief Valve ◽  
Pressure Relief ◽  
Computational Costs ◽  
Constant Degree ◽  
System A ◽  
Disk Mass ◽  
Analysis Scheme ◽  
Surge Control

A direct spring loaded pressure relief valve (DSLPRV) is an efficient hydraulic structure used to control a potential water hammer in pipeline systems. The optimization of a DSLPRV was explored to consider the instability issue of a valve disk and the surge control for a pipeline system. A surge analysis scheme, named the method of characteristics, was implemented into a multiple-objective genetic algorithm to determine the adjustable factors in the operation of the DSLPRV. The forward transient analysis and multi-objective optimization of adjustable factors, such as the spring constant, degree of precompression, and disk mass, showed substantial relaxation in the surge pressure and oscillation of valve disk in a hypothetical pipeline system. The results of the regression analysis of surge were compared with the optimization results to demonstrate the potential of the developed method to substantially reduce computational costs.

The Effect of Pressure Relief Valve Blowdown and Fire Conditions on the Thermo-Hydraulics Within a Pressure Vessel

2006 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Birk ◽  
J. D. J. VanderSteen
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Stratification ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Pressure Relief Valve ◽  
Relief Valve ◽  
Pressure Relief ◽  
Pressure Transducers ◽  
Hydrocarbon Pool ◽  
Computer Controlled ◽  
C 50 ◽  
Fire Conditions

In the summers of 2000 and 2001, a series of controlled fire tests were conducted on horizontal 1890liter (500 US gallon) propane pressure vessels. The test vessels were instrumented with pressure transducers, liquid space, vapor space, and wall thermocouples, and an instrumented flow nozzle in place of a pressure relief valve (PRV). A computer controlled PRV was used to control pressure. The vessels were heated using high momentum, liquid propane utility torches. Open pool fires were not used for the testing because they are strongly affected by wind. These wind effects make it almost impossible to have repeatable test conditions. The fire conditions used were calibrated to give heat inputs similar to a luminous hydrocarbon pool fire with an effective blackbody temperature in the range of 850°C±50°C. PRV blowdown (i.e., blowdown=poppressure−reclosepressure) and fire conditions were varied in this test series while all other input parameters were held constant. The fire conditions were varied by changing the number of burners applied to the vessel wall areas wetted by liquid and vapor. It was found that the vessel content’s response and energy storage varied according to the fire conditions and the PRV operation. The location and quantity of the burners affected the thermal stratification within the liquid, and the liquid swelling (due to vapor generation in the liquid) at the liquid∕vapor interface. The blowdown of the PRV affected the average vessel pressure, average liquid temperature, and time to temperature destratification in the liquid. Large blowdown also delayed thermal rupture.

scholarly journals Forensic Engineering Techniques For Testing And Predicting Lp-Gas Container Relief Venting

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Petersen
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Pressure Relief Valve ◽  
Relief Valve ◽  
Pressure Relief ◽  
Temperature Changes ◽  
Flammable Gas ◽  
Forensic Engineering ◽  
Pressure Changes ◽  
Liquefied Gas

When An Lp-Gas Container Is Involved In A Fire, Flammable Gas Is Usually Vented From The Relief Valve. One Of The First Questions Is Whether The Container Vented The Gas That Caused The Fire Or Whether Gas Was Vented Due To The Fire Heating The Container. If The Relief Valve Vents Gas That Initiates The Fire, It Is Usually Due To An Overfilled Container. This Paper Discusses; 1) The Prediction Of The Rate Of Container Warming Due To Normal Temperature Changes, 2) The Resulting Pressure Changes Of The Liquefied Gas, 3) The Reaction Of The Pressure Relief Valve And The Quantity Of Lp-Gas Vented During The Operation Of The Relief Valve, 4) Designing The Experiment And 4) Adjusting The Model To Reflect Test Data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document