Development of Stress Intensity Factors for Deep Surface Cracks in Plates and Cylinders

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinsheng Li ◽  
Hiroto Itoh ◽  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Kazuya Osakabe ◽  
Hiroshi Okada
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Element Analysis

A number of deep surface cracks have been detected in components of nuclear power plants in recent years. The depths of these cracks are even greater than the half of crack lengths. When a crack is detected during in-service inspections, methods provided in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI or JSME Rules on Fitness-for-Service for Nuclear Power Plants can be used to assess the structural integrity of cracked components. The solution of the stress intensity factor is very important in the assessment of structural integrity. However, in the current codes, the solutions of the stress intensity factor are provided for semi-elliptical surface cracks with a limitation of a/l ≤ 0.5, where a is the crack depth, and l is the crack length. In this study, in order to assess the structural integrity in a more rational manner, the solutions of the stress intensity factor were calculated using finite element analysis with quadratic hexahedron elements for deep semi-elliptical surface cracks in plates, and for axial and circumferential semi-elliptical surface cracks in cylinders. The crack dimensions were focused on the range of a/l = 0.5 to 4.0. Solutions were provided at both the deepest and the surface points of the cracks. Furthermore, some of solutions were compared with the available existing studies and with solutions obtained using finite element analysis with quadratic tetrahedral elements and the virtual crack closure-integral method. As the conclusion, it is concluded that the solutions proposed in this paper are applicable in engineering applications.

Effects of Local Wall Thinning With Crack on Stress Intensity Factor for Pipes Subject to Combined Pressure and Bending

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy (Xiaoya) Tao ◽  
Lei Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Minimum Thickness ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Accelerated Corrosion

Abstract At ageing power plants, local thinning of pipework or vessel is unavoidable due to erosion/corrosion or other reasons such as flow accelerated corrosion (FAC) — one of the common degradation mechanisms in pipework of nuclear power plant. Local thinning reduces the structure strength, resulting in crack initiation from the corrosion pit or welding defect when subject to cyclic loading. General practice is to use the minimum thickness of the thinned area to calculate both limit load and stress intensity factor (SIF) in performing Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA) using Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD). Using the minimum thickness is normally overly conservative as it assumes that thinning occurs grossly instead of locally, leading to unnecessary early repair/replacement and cost. Performing cracked body finite element analysis (FEA) can provide accurate values of limit load and SIF, but it is time consuming and impractical for daily maintenance and emergent support. To minimise the conservatisms and provide a guidance for the assessment of locally thinned pipework or vessel using existing handbook solutions, a study was carried out by the authors on the effect of local thinning on limit loads. The study demonstrates that local thinning has significant effect on limit load if the thinning ratio of thinning depth to original thickness is larger than 25%. It concluded that the limit load solutions given in handbooks (such as R6 or the net section method) are overly conservative if using the minimum local thickness and non-conservative if using the nominal thickness. This paper discusses the effect of local thinning on SIFs of internal/external defects using cracked body finite element method (FEM). The results are compared with R6 weight function SIF solutions for a cylinder. A modified R6 SIF solution is proposed to count for the effect of local thinning profile. Along with the previous published paper on limit load it provides comprehensive understanding and guidance for fracture assessment of the local thinned pipework and vessel.

Stress Intensity Factors for Cracks With Large Aspect Ratio in Cylinder

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinsheng Li ◽  
Hiroaki Doi ◽  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Kazuya Osakabe ◽  
Hiroshi Okada
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Stress Intensity Factors ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Large Aspect Ratio ◽  
Intensity Factors

A number of surface cracks with large aspect ratio have been detected in components of nuclear power plants in recent years. The depths of these cracks are even larger than the half-lengths. The solution of the stress intensity factor is very important for the structural integrity assessment of such cracked components. However, in the current codes, such as ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI and the JSME Rules on Fitness-for-Service for Nuclear Power Plants, solutions of the stress intensity factors are provided for semi-elliptical surface cracks with a limitation of a/l ≤ 0.5, where a is the crack depth and l is the crack length. In order to assess structural integrity in a more rational way, the authors previously developed solutions of the stress intensity factor for semi-elliptical surface cracks in flat plates with a/l = 0.5 to 4 and a/t = 0.0 to 0.8, where t is the wall thickness. In this study, the solutions of the stress intensity factors were calculated for circumferential and axial surface semi-elliptical cracks with large aspect ratios in cylinders. The geometrical dimensions focused on were in the ranges of a/l = 0.5 to 4, a/t = 0.0 to 0.8 and t/Ri = 0 to 1/2, where t is the wall thickness and Ri is the inner radius of the cylinder. Some solutions were compared with the available existing solutions in order to confirm their applicability.

Finite Element Analysis of Polyethylene Pipe Butt Fusion Joints with Circumferential Surface Cracks

2013 ◽  
Vol 785-786 ◽  
pp. 1151-1158
Author(s):  
Zhi Bin Zhu ◽  
Xiao Xiang Yang ◽  
Li Jing Chen ◽  
Nai Chang Lin ◽  
Zhi Tuo Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Viscoelastic Material ◽  
Surface Crack ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Polyethylene Pipe

Based on the viscoelastic material property of polyethylene pipe, software ANSYS was used to simulate and analyze the mechanical property of polyethylene pipe butt fusion joints with circumferential surface crack defects. The viscoelastic material creep parameters were characterized as Prony series and 1/4 node singular element was selected for meshing along the boundaries of the crack, then the stress intensity factor of polyethylene pipe butt fusion joints with circumferential surface crack was calculated under the uniform internal pressure. Through the finite element simulation, the result showed that polyethylene pipe were most likely to fracture failure when crack initiated. Thus the viscoelasticity of materials can be ignored when analyzing the stress intensity factor of circumferential surface cracks of polyethylene pipe. the main influencing factor of the circumferential crack defects was the ratio of the crack depth to the thickness of polyethylene pipe.

Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Evaluation of a Flowline Clamp Connector Using Finite Element Modeling of a Crack

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Element Analysis

Abstract This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.

Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Evaluation of a Flowline Clamp Connector Using Finite Element Modeling of a Crack

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Element Analysis

This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document