Use of LBB Methodology to Support the Transition Break Size Concept

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Nestell ◽  
David W. Rackiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
Reactor Coolant ◽  
Design Basis ◽  
Piping Systems ◽  
Pipe Break ◽  
Core Cooling ◽  
Pipe Size

The design basis for a loss of coolant accident in nuclear power plants has previously been based on the assumption that the largest size coolant pipe instantaneously undergoes a double ended “guillotine” break (DEGB) and the resulting loss of water must be mitigated by an emergency core cooling system (ECCS) to maintain core cooling after shutdown. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is close to allowing a risk-informed design basis break size, called the Transition Break Size (TBS), to be used for LOCA break size assumptions for ECCS design. The TBS approach will require full safety redundancy for an ECCS system sized to handle a break of the next largest reactor coolant pipe size (rather than the largest reactor coolant pipe size), and it will allow relaxed system redundancy requirements for handling the largest pipe break size. The TBS will thereby reduce the cost of the safety-grade ECCS system in new plant designs and will increase operational flexibility in existing plants. The TBS approach is based on the results of NRC elicitation studies with piping experts regarding historical pipe performance and risk of sudden failure. The approach is non-deterministic and is a conceptual change from the largest-pipe-size break assumption. The conceptual discontinuity between deterministic and elicitation-based break size assumptions could be uncomfortable for those schooled in strictly deterministic accident analyses. In this paper we explore the “leak-before-break” (LBB) methodology as it applies to large pipe break analyses in nuclear piping systems, and show through examples that the elicitation-based TBS approach is indeed conservative when TBS results are compared with deterministic LBB evaluations of similar piping systems. Thus, LBB provides a deterministic means for showing defense in depth against LOCAs greater than the TBS break size.

Revised LOCA Frequency Estimates From an Expert Elicitation Process

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Scott ◽  
Robert Lee Tregoning ◽  
Lee Richard Abramson
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
Expert Elicitation ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Plant Design ◽  
Elicitation Process ◽  
Core Cooling

The double-ended-guillotine break (DEGB) criterion of the largest primary piping system in the plant, which generally provides the limiting condition for the emergency core cooling system requirements, is widely recognized as an extremely unlikely event. As a result, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering a risk-informed revision of the design-basis break size requirements for commercial nuclear power plants. In support of this effort, loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) frequency estimates were developed using an expert elicitation process by consolidating service history data and insights from probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) studies with knowledge of plant design, operation, and material performance. This paper describes, and presents the results for, two of the sensitivity analyses conducted as part of this effort (overconfidence adjustment and aggregation method) to examine the assumptions, structure, and techniques used to process the elicitation responses to develop group estimates of the LOCA frequency estimates.

Modeling of Thermal Hydraulics Features of Top Water Reflood Experiment PARAMETER-SF3 Using SOCRAT/V2 Code

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arcadii E. Kisselev ◽  
Valerii F. Strizhov ◽  
Alexander D. Vasiliev ◽  
Vladimir I. Nalivayev ◽  
Nikolay Ya. Parshin
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Severe Accident ◽  
Numerical Code ◽  
Thermal Hydraulics ◽  
Vver Fuel ◽  
Design Basis ◽  
Best Estimate ◽  
Core Cooling

The PARAMETER-SF3 test conditions simulated a severe LOCA (Loss of Coolant Accident) nuclear power plant sequence in which the overheated up to 1700÷2300K core would be reflooded from the top and the bottom in occasion of ECCS (Emergency Core Cooling System) recovery. The test was successfully conducted at the NPO “LUTCH”, Podolsk, Russia, in October 31, 2008, and was the third of four experiments of series PARAMETER-SF. PARAMETER facility of NPO “LUTCH”, Podolsk, is designed for studies of the VVER fuel assemblies behavior under conditions simulating design basis, beyond design basis and severe accidents. The test bundle was made up of 19 fuel rod simulators with a length of approximately 3.12 m (heated rod simulators) and 2.92 m (unheated rod simulator). Heating was carried out electrically using 4-mm-diameter tantalum heating elements installed in the center of the rods and surrounded by annular UO2 pellets. The rod cladding was identical to that used in VVERs: Zr1%Nb, 9.13 mm outside diameter, 0.7 mm wall thickness. After the maximum cladding temperature of about 1900K was reached in the bundle during PARAMETER-SF3 test, the top flooding was initiated. The thermal hydraulic and SFD (Severe Fuel Damage) best estimate numerical complex SOCRAT/V2 was used for the calculation of PARAMETER-SF3 experiment. The counter-current flow limitation (CCFL) model was implemented to best estimate numerical code SOCRAT/V2 developed for modeling thermal hydraulics and severe accident phenomena in a reactor. Thermal hydraulics in PARAMETER-SF3 experiment played very important role and its adequate modeling is important for the thermal analysis. The results obtained by the complex SOCRAT/V2 were compared with experimental data concerning different aspects of thermal hydraulics behavior including the CCFL phenomenon during the reflood. The temperature experimental data were found to be in a good agreement with calculated results. It is indicative of the adequacy of modeling the complicated thermo-hydraulic behavior in the PARAMETER-SF3 test.

scholarly journals ANALYTICAL SIMULATION OF A PWR USING MELCOR

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3A) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maritza Rodríguez Gual ◽  
Nathalia N. Araújo ◽  
Marcos C. Maturana
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
Severe Accident ◽  
Normal Operation ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Severe Accidents ◽  
Reference Plant

After the two most significant nuclear accidents in history – the Chernobyl Reactor Four explosion in Ukraine(1986) and the Fukushima Daiichi accident in Japan (2011) –, the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) included a new chapter (19) dedicated to the Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) and Severe Accident Analysis (SAA), covering accidents with core melting. FSAR is the most important document for licensing of siting, construction, commissioning and operation of a nuclear power plant. In the USA, the elaboration of the FSAR chapter 19 is according to the review and acceptance criteria described in the NUREG-0800 and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200. The same approach is being adopted in Brazil by National Nuclear Energy Commission (CNEN). Therefore, the FSAR elaboration requires a detailed knowledge of severe accident phenomena and an analysis of the design vulnerabilities to the severe accidents, as provided in a PSA – e.g., the identification of the initiating events involving significant Core Damage Frequency (CDF) are made in the PSA Level 1. As part of the design and certification activities of a plant of reference, the Laboratory of Risk Analysis, Evaluating and Management (LabRisco), located in the University of São Paulo (USP), Brazil, has been preparing a group of specialists to model the progression of severe accidents in Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR), to support the CNEN regulatory expectation – since Brazilian Nuclear Power Plants (NPP), i.e., Angra 1, 2 and 3, have PWR type, the efforts of the CNEN are concentrated on accidents at this type of reactor. The initial investigation objectives were on completing the detailed input data for a PWR cooling system model using the U.S. NRC MELCOR 2.2 code, and on the study of the reference plant equipment behavior – by comparing this model results and the reference plant normal operation main parameters, as modeled with RELAP5/MOD2 code.

Head Loss Through Fibrous Beds Generated on Different Types of Containment Sump Strainers

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saya Lee ◽  
Suhaeb Abdulsattar ◽  
Yassin A. Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Safety Issue ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Head Loss ◽  
Debris Accumulation ◽  
Approach Velocity

During a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA), the high energy jet from the break may impinge on surrounding surfaces and materials, producing a relatively large amount of fibrous debris (mostly insulation materials). The debris may be transported through the reactor containment and reach the sump strainers. Accumulation of such debris on the strainers’ surface can cause a loss of Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH) and negatively affect the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) capabilities. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S.NRC) initiated the Generic Safety Issue (GSI) 191 to understand the physical phenomena involved in this type of event, and help develop the tools to prove the safety and reliability of the existing Light Water Reactors (LWR) under these conditions. Some nuclear power plants have already adopted countermeasures in an attempt to limit the effect of the debris accumulation on the ECCS performance, by replacing or modifying the existing strainer configurations. In this paper, two different strainer designs have been considered and sensitivity analysis was conducted to study the effect of the approach velocity on the pressure drop at the strainer caused by the debris accumulation. The development of the fibrous beds was visually recorded in order to correlate the head loss, the approach velocity, and the thickness of the fibrous bed. The experimental results were compared to semi-empirical models and theoretical models proposed by previous researchers.

Application of Thermal Hydraulic Code SOCRAT/V2 to Top Water Reflood Experiment PARAMETER-SF3

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander D. Vasiliev
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Severe Accident ◽  
Numerical Code ◽  
Thermal Hydraulics ◽  
Vver Fuel ◽  
Design Basis ◽  
Best Estimate ◽  
Core Cooling

The PARAMETER-SF3 test conditions simulated a severe LOCA (Loss of Coolant Accident) nuclear power plant sequence in which the overheated up to 1700–2300K core would be reflooded from the top and the bottom in occasion of ECCS (Emergency Core Cooling System) recovery. The test was successfully conducted at the NPO “LUTCH”, Podolsk, Russia, in October 31, 2008, and was the third of four experiments of series PARAMETER-SF. PARAMETER facility of NPO “LUTCH”, Podolsk, is designed for studies of the VVER fuel assemblies behavior under conditions simulating design basis, beyond design basis and severe accidents. The test bundle was made up of 19 fuel rod simulators with a length of approximately 3.12 m (heated rod simulators) and 2.92 m (unheated rod simulator). Heating was carried out electrically using 4-mm-diameter tantalum heating elements installed in the center of the rods and surrounded by annular UO2 pellets. The rod cladding was identical to that used in VVERs: Zr1%Nb, 9.13 mm outside diameter, 0.7 mm wall thickness. After the maximum cladding temperature of about 1900K was reached in the bundle during PARAMETER-SF3 test, the top flooding was initiated. The thermal hydraulic and SFD (Severe Fuel Damage) best estimate numerical complex SOCRAT/V2 was used for the calculation of PARAMETER-SF3 experiment. The counter-current flow limitation (CCFL) model was implemented to best estimate numerical code SOCRAT/V2 developed for modeling thermal hydraulics and severe accident phenomena in a reactor. Thermal hydraulics in PARAMETER-SF3 experiment played very important role and its adequate modeling is important for the thermal analysis. The results obtained by the complex SOCRAT/V2 were compared with experimental data concerning different aspects of thermal hydraulics behavior including the CCFL phenomenon during the reflood. The temperature experimental data were found to be in a good agreement with calculated results. It is indicative of the adequacy of modeling the complicated thermo-hydraulic behavior in the PARAMETER-SF3 test.

scholarly journals Early quantification of reliability for a safety critical and control system: a case study of reactor core cooling system

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2.12) ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
Vinay Kumar ◽  
Suraj Gupta ◽  
Anil Kumar Tripathi
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Reactor Core ◽  
Safety Critical ◽  
Core Cooling ◽  
And Control

Using Probabilistic Reliability analysis for Quantifying reliability of a system is already a common practice in Reliability Engineering community. This method plays an important role in analyzing reliability of nuclear plants and its various components. In Nuclear Power Plants Reactor Core Cooling System is a component of prime importance as its breakdown can disrupt Cooling System of power plant. In this paper, we present a framework for early quantification of Reliability and illustrated with a Safety Critical and Control System as case study which runs in a Nuclear Power Plant.  

The Analysis of AP1000 Beyond Design Basis DEDVI Accident

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Heat Removal ◽  
The Core ◽  
Design Basis ◽  
Injection Line ◽  
Design Basis Accident ◽  
Core Cooling

Double ended break of direct vessel injection line (DEDVI) is the most typical small-break lost of coolant accident (LOCA) in AP 1000 nuclear power plant. This study simulated the DEDVI (without actuation of automatic depressurization system 1–3 stage valves, accumulators and passive residual heat removal heat exchanger) beyond design basis accident (BDBA) to validate the safety capability of AP1000 under such conditions. The results show that the core will be uncovered for about 863 seconds and then recovered by water after gravity injection from IRWST into the pressure vessel. The peak cladding temperature (PCT) goes up to 838.08°C, much lower than the limiting value 1204°C. This study confirms that in the DEDVI beyond design basis accident, the passive core cooling system (PXS) can effectually cool the core and preserve it integrate, and ensure the safety of AP 1000 nuclear power plant.

Beyond Design Basis Seismic Analysis for Atucha II Nuclear Plant

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Frederick W. Brust ◽  
Gery Wilkowski ◽  
Heqin Xu ◽  
Alfredo A. Betervide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Seismic Event ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Safety Margin ◽  
Design Basis ◽  
Heavy Water Reactor ◽  
And Performance

The Atucha II nuclear power plant is a pressurized heavy water reactor being constructed in Argentina. Nuclear power plants must be designed to maintain their integrity and performance of safety functions for a bounding set of normal operational events as well as abnormal events that might occur during the lifetime of the plant. Seismic fracture mechanics evaluations for the Atucha II plant showed that even with a seismic event with the amplitudes corresponding to an event with a probability of 10−6 per year, that a double-ended guillotine break (DEGB) was pragmatically impossible due to the incredibly high leakage rates and total loss of make-up water inventory. The critical circumferential through-wall flaw size for this case is 94-percent of the circumference. These analyses are performed by placing cracked-pipe-elements into a complete model of the primary cooling system including the reactor pressure vessel, pumps, and steam generators as summarized in the paper. This paper summarizes these results and further shows how much higher the applied accelerations would have to be to cause a DEGB for an initial circumferential through-wall crack that was 33 percent (about 120°) around the circumference. This flaw length would also be easily detected by leakage and loss of make-up water inventory. These analyses showed that the applied seismic peak-ground accelerations had to exceed 25 g’s for the case of this through-wall-crack to become a DEGB during a single seismic loading event. This is a factor of 80 times higher than the 10−6 seismic event accelerations, or 240 times higher than the SSE accelerations. This suggests there is a huge safety margin for beyond design basis seismic events and Atucha II plant rupture is pragmatically impossible. These surprising results are discussed and could be potentially applicable to other nuclear power plants as well.

Development of Best-Estimate ECCS Evaluation Methodology for APR1400

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seok-Ho Lee ◽  
Mun-Soo Kim ◽  
Han-Gon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Evaluation Methodology ◽  
Preliminary Calculation ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Water Storage Tank ◽  
Best Estimate ◽  
Design Characteristics ◽  
Core Cooling

Advanced Power Reactor 1400 (APR1400) is an evolutionary Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) equipped with such advanced features as the Direct Vessel Injection (DVI), the Fluidic Device (FD) in the Safety Injection Tank (SIT), and the In-containment Refueling Water Storage Tank (IRWST) in the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS). To verify the performance of these advanced features, more realistic performance evaluation methodology is desired since existing methodologies use too conservative assumptions which cause negative biases to these features. In this study, therefore, a best estimate evaluation methodology for the APR1400 ECCS under large break loss of cooling accident (LBLOCA) is developed targeting operating license of the Shin Kori 3&4 nuclear power plants (SKN 3&4), the first commercial APR1400 plants. On this purpose, a variety of existing best estimate evaluation methodologies previously used are reviewed. As a result of this review, a methodology named KREM is selected for this study. The KREM is based on RELAP5/MOD3.1K and has been used for Korean operating plants since 2002 when it was first approved by Korean regulation. For this study, RELAP5/MOD3.3 (Patch 3), the latest version of RELAP series is selected since it could appropriately simulate the multi-dimensional phenomena for the APR1400 design characteristics. To quantify the code accuracy, analyses covering experimental data have been performed for 36 kinds of separated effect tests (SETs) and integral effect tests (IETs). The uncertainty in the peak cladding temperature (PCT) of the APR1400 is evaluated preliminarily. Based on the preliminary calculation, final uncertainty quantification and bias evaluation are performed to obtain the licensing PCT for Shin-Kori 3&4 plants and the result shows that the LBLOCA licensing acceptance criteria are well satisfied.

Assessment of APR-1400 Emergency Core Cooling System Performance for Design Basis LOCA Redefinition

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Gu Kang ◽  
Seung-Hoon Ahn ◽  
Soon Heung Chang ◽  
Byung-Gil Huh ◽  
Young-Seok Bang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Exceedance Probability ◽  
Plant Design ◽  
Diesel Generator ◽  
Start Time ◽  
Design Modification ◽  
Design Basis ◽  
Core Cooling

As a part of the efforts to develop the risk-informed regulation, alternative rulemaking of 10CFR50.46 is underway. In the rule, USNRC divided the current spectrum of LOCA break sizes into two regions, by determining a transition break size (TBS), and the LOCAs for any breaks larger than TBS would be regarded as beyond design basis accident (BDBA). A combined deterministic and probabilistic procedure (CDPP) was proposed for safety assessment of BDBAs. The performance of the APR-1400 emergency core cooling system (ECCS) performance was assessed against large break LOCA applying CDPP. It was confirmed that current APR-1400 ECCS design has capability to mitigate BDB LOCA by analyzing ECCS cooling performance for BDB LOCA. The proposed CDPP was also applied to design changes of the emergency diesel generator (EDG) start time extension and power uprates with simplified assumption that the probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) data are still valid. By assumptions and considerations, the CDPP to assess ECCS performance for plant design modification was reduced to calculating conditional exceedance probability (CEP) of one sequence and comparing allowable value. The allowable CEP was used to determine whether the design change is acceptable or not, and discussions were made for acceptable nuclear power plant changes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document