Design Competition for Development of a General Purpose Fissile Package
In general, the design process involves envisioning and developing concepts for a component or system, combining these fractions into an integrated whole and evaluating the final design against functional requirements. A major challenge is developing components or systems to a level of maturity that permits feasibility evaluation of the integrated whole while optimizing opposing performance functions (e.g., thick for strength, but thin for heat transfer). Economic pressure often drives design concepts to conservative bases early in the process. The approach presented in this paper is a highly cost-effective means of developing alternative design solutions for given set of design requirements — in this case a radioactive materials transportation package. In response to planned phase-out of the Department of Transportation 6M specification package, an internal competition was held at the Savannah River Site to develop design proposals for the 6M replacement. Two teams were provided with design requirements, design evaluation criteria, a limited budget and short time frame to develop proposals for a General Purpose Fissile Package (GPFP). Resulting GPFP designs, while quite different, met the performance requirements, were economical, operator friendly, light weight, certifiable, and able to accommodate a wide range of radioactive materials. The methodology of an in-house design competition proved to be a very cost effective way of advancing design alternatives from design requirements to practical design proposals. Estimated fabrication costs for each of the designs are significantly less than other packages currently available for the proposed service.