Application of Master Curve Data for Reactor Vessel Steels

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Server ◽  
Timothy J. Griesbach ◽  
Stan T. Rosinski
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Curve Fracture ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The Master Curve method has been developed to determine fracture toughness of a specific material in the brittle-to-ductile transition range. This method is technically more descriptive of actual material behavior and accounts for the statistical nature of fracture toughness properties as an alternative to the current ASME Code reference toughness curves. The Master Curve method uses a single temperature, To, as an index of the Master Curve fracture toughness transition temperature. This method has been successfully applied to numerous fracture toughness data sets of pressure vessel steels contained in the Master Curve database, including the beltline materials for the Kewaunee reactor pressure vessel. The database currently contains over 5,500 toughness data records for vessel weld, plate and forging materials, and it is currently being updated to include more recent fracture toughness data. Application of Master Curve fracture toughness data to reactor pressure vessel (RPV) integrity evaluations requires some assumptions relative to the degree of constraint in the fracture toughness test specimens versus the actual assumed RPV flaw. An excessive degree of conservatism can be introduced if the constraint levels are substantially different. In performing a Master Curve evaluation, the analysis may be restricted by the type of fracture toughness data available. Any excess conservatism should be appropriately considered when the overall safety margin is applied. For example, the precracked Charpy three-point bend specimen actually has some advantages over the compact tension specimen when the application involves a shallow surface flaw in a RPV wall. This paper analyzes some key fracture toughness results from several weld data sets containing both unirradiated and irradiated data to evaluate constraint effects in fracture toughness and pre-cracked Charpy specimens. The evaluated To values were compared to determine if there is any difference in bias from specimen geometry between the unirradiated and irradiated data.

Fracture Toughness Evaluation of Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels by Master Curve Method Using Miniature Compact Tension Specimens

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tohru Tobita ◽  
Yutaka Nishiyama ◽  
Takuyo Ohtsu ◽  
Makoto Udagawa ◽  
Jinya Katsuyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Loading Rate ◽  
Compact Tension ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Toughness Evaluation ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Fracture Toughness Evaluation ◽  
Reactor Pressure

We conducted fracture toughness testing on five types of commercially manufactured steel with different ductile-to-brittle transition temperatures. This was performed using specimens of different sizes and shapes, including the precracked Charpy-type (PCCv), 0.4T-CT, 1T-CT, and miniature compact tension specimens (0.16T-CT). Our objective was to investigate the applicability of 0.16T-CT specimens to fracture toughness evaluation by the master curve method for reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels. The reference temperature (To) values determined from the 0.16T-CT specimens were overall in good agreement with those determined from the 1T-CT specimens. The scatter of the 1T-equivalent fracture toughness values obtained from the 0.16T-CT specimens was equivalent to that obtained from the other larger specimens. Furthermore, we examined the loading rate effect on To for the 0.16T-CT specimens within the quasi-static loading range prescribed by ASTM E1921. The higher loading rate gave rise to a slightly higher To, and this dependency was almost the same for the larger specimens. We suggested an optimum test temperature on the basis of the Charpy transition temperature for determining To using the 0.16T-CT specimens.

Applicability of Master Curve Method to Japanese Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Miura ◽  
Naoki Soneda ◽  
Taku Arai ◽  
Kenji Dohi
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Test Temperature ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Loading Rate ◽  
Specimen Size ◽  
Master Curves ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The Master Curve method has been proposed and recognized worldwide as an alternative approach to evaluate fracture toughness of reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels in brittle-to-ductile transition temperature range. This method theoretically provides the confidence levels of fracture toughness in consideration of the statistical distribution, which is an inherent property of fracture toughness. In this study, a series of fracture toughness tests was conducted for typical Japanese RPV steels, SFVQ1A and SQV2A, to identify the effects of test temperature, specimen size, and loading rate, and the applicability of the Master Curve method was experimentally validated. The differences in test temperature and specimen size did not affect master curves. In contrast, increasing loading rate significantly shifted master curves to higher temperatures. The lower bound curve based on the master curve could conservatively envelop all of the experimental fracture toughness data. The present rule, in which the lower limit of fracture toughness is indirectly determined by Charpy impact test results, can be too conservative, while the application of the Master Curve method may significantly reduce the conservativity of the allowable level of fracture toughness.

Further Evaluation of the Structural Integrity of the Chinese Qinshan 300-MWe Reactor Pressure Vessel Under Pressurized Thermal Shock Using the Master Curve Method

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yupeng Cao ◽  
Yinbiao He ◽  
Hui Hu ◽  
Hui Li
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Thermal Shock ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Pressurized Thermal Shock ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Pressurized thermal shock (PTS) is a potential major threat to the structural integrity of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) in a nuclear power plant. An earlier work on the PTS analysis of the Chinese Qinshan 300-MWe RPV was performed with the single parameter fracture mechanics method by Shanghai nuclear engineering research and design institute (SNERDI). The integrity analysis of this RPV under PTS was re-evaluated using the Master Curve method later in the paper PVP2015-45577[1]. The objective of this paper is to expand on the previous work, covering more crack geometries and transients to discuss the differences in the use of Master curve based and single parameter linear elastic fracture mechanics based method for PTS analysis. Attempts are made to consider additional size adjustment to the long crack front, which yields more reasonable maximum allowable transition temperature.

Technical Basis for Proposed Code Case of Using a Master Curve in Lieu of the Code KIc Curve in ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth K. Yoon ◽  
John G. Merkle
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Task Group ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Transition Range ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Curve Fracture

The Master Curve method for determination of fracture toughness in the transition range in ASTM standard E1921 [1] brought an opportunity for the ASME Code to adopt a much better fracture toughness curve based on directly measured fracture toughness data. This also enables obtaining statistically based fracture toughness data. The industry, through PVRC Task Group (subsequently Section XI Task Group on Master Curve Fracture Toughness), took a two-phase approach to implement the adoption of the Master Curve method in the ASME Code. First, Phase I was completed with the issuance of ASME Code Cases N-629/N-631 [9, 10], published in 1999 which allowed the existing Code KIc curve to be used by means of an alternate indexing reference temperature RTT0. This provided an important new approach to allow material specific, measured fracture toughness curves for ferritic steels in the code applications. However, this only rectified part of the shortcomings of the present Code KIc curve. In Phase II, it is intended to develop a direct means to utilize a tolerance bound of the Master Curve itself in place of the ASME KIc curve. This paper summarizes a proposal for such a procedure whereby a Master Curve fracture toughness tolerance bound is made usable in the ASME flaw evaluation processes, i.e. in Appendix A and Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. A draft code case is presented in Appendix in this paper.

Statistical Analyses for Probabilistic Assessments of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Structural Integrity: Building a Master Curve on an Extract of the “Euro” Fracture Toughness Dataset, Controlling Statistical Uncertainty for Both Mono-Temperature and Multi-Temperature Tests

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florent Josse ◽  
Yannick Lefebvre ◽  
Patrick Todeschini ◽  
Silvia Turato ◽  
Eric Meister
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Temperature Dependence ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Ferritic Steels ◽  
Statistical Uncertainty ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Assessing the structural integrity of a nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) subjected to pressurized-thermal-shock (PTS) transients is extremely important to safety. In addition to conventional deterministic calculations to confirm RPV integrity, Electricite´ de France (EDF) carries out probabilistic analyses. Probabilistic analyses are interesting because some key variables, albeit conventionally taken at conservative values, can be modeled more accurately through statistical variability. One variable which significantly affects RPV structural integrity assessment is cleavage fracture initiation toughness. The reference fracture toughness method currently in use at EDF is the RCCM and ASME Code lower-bound KIC based on the indexing parameter RTNDT. However, in order to quantify the toughness scatter for probabilistic analyses, the master curve method is being analyzed at present. Furthermore, the master curve method is a direct means of evaluating fracture toughness based on KJC data. In the framework of the master curve investigation undertaken by EDF, this article deals with the following two statistical items: building a master curve from an extract of a fracture toughness dataset (from the European project “Unified Reference Fracture Toughness Design curves for RPV Steels”) and controlling statistical uncertainty for both mono-temperature and multi-temperature tests. Concerning the first point, master curve temperature dependence is empirical in nature. To determine the “original” master curve, Wallin postulated that a unified description of fracture toughness temperature dependence for ferritic steels is possible, and used a large number of data corresponding to nuclear-grade pressure vessel steels and welds. Our working hypothesis is that some ferritic steels may behave in slightly different ways. Therefore we focused exclusively on the basic french reactor vessel metal of types A508 Class 3 and A 533 grade B Class 1, taking the sampling level and direction into account as well as the test specimen type. As for the second point, the emphasis is placed on the uncertainties in applying the master curve approach. For a toughness dataset based on different specimens of a single product, application of the master curve methodology requires the statistical estimation of one parameter: the reference temperature T0. Because of the limited number of specimens, estimation of this temperature is uncertain. The ASTM standard provides a rough evaluation of this statistical uncertainty through an approximate confidence interval. In this paper, a thorough study is carried out to build more meaningful confidence intervals (for both mono-temperature and multi-temperature tests). These results ensure better control over uncertainty, and allow rigorous analysis of the impact of its influencing factors: the number of specimens and the temperatures at which they have been tested.

Validation of RTT0 for German Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels

2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dieter Siegele ◽  
Elisabeth Keim ◽  
Gerhard Nagel
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Reference Temperature ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Size Adjustment ◽  
Reactor Pressure

For the introduction of the new reference temperature RTT0 of the ASME Code Cases N-629 and N-631 into the German Standard KTA 3201.2, the applicability of RTT0 was validated by the reevaluation of the existing fracture toughness database of German reactor pressure vessel. (RPV) steels including unirradiated and irradiated base materials and weld metal data. The test temperatures of the database were standardized to the reference temperature T0 of the master curve of the data sets and the database was compared with the ASME KIC-curve as adjusted by RTT0. The KIC-curve adjusted by RTT0 enveloped both the 1T-size adjusted database and also the as-measured database, corresponding to the definition of RTT0. Thus, the results also prove the validity of the KIC(RTT0)-curve for allowable flaw sizes and up to the crack length spectrum of the ASME KIC-database without size adjustment of T0. The results of both investigations confirmed the validity of RTT0 for German RPV steels. The majority of existing fracture toughness data are based on KIC-values. More recent data are (KJC) related to the issuing of ASTM E 1921 in 1997 and to the success of the master curve-based T0 approach. Therefore, the possible difference between T0 determined from KJC and from KIC was investigated with available databases for RPV steels. The comparison of T0(KJC) and T0(KIC) showed a 1:1 correlation proving the equivalence of KJC and KIC in the determination of T0.

Fracture Toughness Transferability Study Between the Master Curve Method and a Pressure Vessel Nozzle Using Local Approach

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anssi Laukkanen ◽  
Pekka Nevasmaa ◽  
Heikki Keina¨nen ◽  
Kim Wallin
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Reference Temperature ◽  
Cleavage Crack ◽  
Local Approach ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Constitutive Parameters

Local approach methods are to greater extent used in structural integrity evaluation, in particular with respect to initiation of an unstable cleavage crack. However, local approach methods have had a tendency to be considered as methodologies with ‘qualitative’ potential, rather than quantitative usage in realistic analyses where lengthy and in some cases ambiguous calibration of local approach parameters is not feasible. As such, studies need to be conducted to illustrate the usability of local approach methods in structural integrity analyses and improve upon the transferability of their intrinsic, material like, constitutive parameters. Improvements of this kind can be attained by constructing improved models utilizing state of the art numerical simulation methods and presenting consistent calibration methodologies for the constitutive parameters. The current study investigates the performance of a modified Beremin model by comparing integrity evaluation results of the local approach model to those attained by using the constraint corrected Master Curve methodology. Current investigation applies the Master Curve method in conjunction with the T-stress correction of the reference temperature and a modified Beremin model to an assessment of a three-dimensional pressure vessel nozzle in a spherical vessel end. The material information for the study is extracted from the ‘Euro-Curve’ ductile to brittle transition region fracture toughness round robin test program. The experimental results are used to determine the Master Curve reference temperature and calibrate local approach parameters. The values are then used to determine the cumulative failure probability of cleavage crack initiation in the model structure. The results illustrate that the Master Curve results with the constraint correction are to some extent more conservative than the results attained using local approach. The used methodologies support each other and indicate that with the applied local approach and Master Curve procedures reliable estimates of structural integrity can be attained for complex material behavior and structural geometries.

Master Curve Approach for Some Japanese Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minoru Tomimatsu ◽  
Takashi Hirano ◽  
Seiji Asada ◽  
Ryoichi Saeki ◽  
Naoki Miura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Pressure Vessel Steels ◽  
The World ◽  
Reactor Pressure ◽  
Plant Components

The Master Curve Approach for assessing fracture toughness of reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels has been accepted throughout the world. The Master Curve Approach using fracture toughness data obtained from RPV steels in Japan has been investigated in order to incorporate this approach into the Japanese Electric Association (JEA) Code 4206, “Method of Verification Tests of the Fracture Toughness for Nuclear Power Plant Components”. This paper presents the applicability of the Master Curve Approach for Japanese RPV steels.

Evaluation of Fracture Toughness of a SA580 Gr. 3 Reactor Pressure Vessel Using a Bimodal Master Curve Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Min Kim ◽  
Seok-Min Hong ◽  
Min-Chul Kim ◽  
Bong-Sang Lee
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Cooling Rate ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Random Parameter ◽  
Random Inhomogeneity ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Inhomogeneous Materials ◽  
Material Inhomogeneity ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Abstract The standard master curve (MC) approach has a major limitation in that it is only applicable to homogeneous datasets. In nature, steels are macroscopically inhomogeneous. Reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steel has different fracture toughness with varying distance from the inner surface of the wall due to the higher cooling rate at the surface (deterministic material inhomogeneity). On the other hand, the T0 value itself behaves like a random parameter when the datasets have large scatter because the datasets are for several different materials (random inhomogeneity). In this paper, four regions, the surface, 1/8 T, 1/4 T, and 1/2 T, were considered for fracture toughness specimens of Korean Standard Nuclear Plant (KSNP) SA508 Gr. 3 steel to provide information on deterministic material inhomogeneity and random inhomogeneity effects. Fracture toughness tests were carried out for the four regions at three test temperatures in the transition region and the microstructure of each region was analyzed. The amount of upper bainite increased toward the center, which has a lower cooling rate; therefore, the center has lower fracture toughness than the surface so reference temperature (T0) is higher. The fracture toughness was evaluated using the bimodal master curve (BMC) approach. The results of the BMC analyses were compared with those obtained via a conventional master curve analyses. The results indicate that the bimodal master approach considering inhomogeneous materials provides a better description of scatter in the fracture toughness data than a conventional master curve analysis does.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document