Copula-Based Bivariate Modelling of Significant Wave Height and Wave Period and the Effects of Climate Change on the Joint Distribution

Author(s):  
Erik Vanem

The joint distribution of several met-ocean variables is required for risk assessment and load and response calculations in marine engineering. For example, a joint description is needed to construct environmental contours for probabilistic structural reliability analyses. Typically, the joint distribution of significant wave height and wave period is required as a minimum. This paper presents a study on various bivariate modelling techniques for the joint distribution of significant wave height and zero-crossing wave period, i.e. a conditional model, a bi-variate log-normal model and several meta-models based on parametric copulas. Each of the models is fitted to data generated from a numerical wave model for the current climate and for two future climates consistent with the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios. Thus, the objective of this study is twofold. First, the joint models obtained by the various modelling techniques will be compared. Secondly, the potential effect of climate change on the simultaneous distribution of significant wave height and wave period will be explored. The results indicate that straightforward application of many of the most common families of copulas fails to capture the dependence structure in the data, and that the conditional model performs better than these naive approaches. However, if more advanced copula construction techniques are applied, significant improvements can be achieved. The results also suggest that significant wave height and zero-crossing wave period tend to be more correlated in a future climate, at least in the extremes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 309
Author(s):  
James Allen ◽  
Gregorio Iglesias ◽  
Deborah Greaves ◽  
Jon Miles

The WaveCat is a moored Wave Energy Converter design which uses wave overtopping discharge into a variable v-shaped hull, to generate electricity through low head turbines. Physical model tests of WaveCat WEC were carried out to determine the device reflection, transmission, absorption and capture coefficients based on selected wave conditions. The model scale was 1:30, with hulls of 3 m in length, 0.4 m in height and a freeboard of 0.2 m. Wave gauges monitored the surface elevation at discrete points around the experimental area, and level sensors and flowmeters recorded the amount of water captured and released by the model. Random waves of significant wave height between 0.03 m and 0.12 m and peak wave periods of 0.91 s to 2.37 s at model scale were tested. The wedge angle of the device was set to 60°. A reflection analysis was carried out using a revised three probe method and spectral analysis of the surface elevation to determine the incident, reflected and transmitted energy. The results show that the reflection coefficient is highest (0.79) at low significant wave height and low peak wave period, the transmission coefficient is highest (0.98) at low significant wave height and high peak wave period, and absorption coefficient is highest (0.78) when significant wave height is high and peak wave period is low. The model also shows the highest Capture Width Ratio (0.015) at wavelengths on the order of model length. The results have particular implications for wave energy conversion prediction potential using this design of device.


Author(s):  
Catarina S. Soares ◽  
C. Guedes Soares

This paper presents the results of a comparison of the fit of three bivariate models to a set of 14 years of significant wave height and peak wave period data from the North Sea. One of the methods defines the joint distribution from a marginal distribution of significant wave height and a set of distributions of peak period conditional on significant wave height. Other method applies the Plackett model to the data and the third one applies the Box-Cox transformation to the data in order to make it approximately normal and then fits a bivariate normal distribution to the transformed data set. It is shown that all methods provide a good fit but each one have its own strengths and weaknesses, being the choice dependent on the data available and applications in mind.


2017 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 170-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chendi Wang ◽  
Jianfang Fei ◽  
Juli Ding ◽  
Ruiqing Hu ◽  
Xiaogang Huang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document