Comments on Recent Code Developments Related to Pipeline Freespan Analysis

Author(s):  
Rony Peterson Ferreira ◽  
Claudia Albergario Claro ◽  
Nelson Szilard Galgoul

During the last 20 years the Dn V code [1–5] has represented the latest word in design recommendations for pipeline free span evaluations. This is true to the extent that important codes, such as API RP 1111 [6], simply refer to Dn V for further guidelines. During most of these 20 years the majority of the design codes which did have anything to say about vibrations due to vortex shedding, including Dn V, had and in general still have, dissociated axial pipeline forces from the vortex shedding problem. It is well known, however, that the natural period of a compressed element increases as does also the axial compressive force. In March, 2002 Dn V released a new free span recommended practice [5], in which an attempt was made to couple the global free span buckling problem and that of vortex induced vibrations. All those of the pipeline engineering market, who have attempted to use it, will certainly agree that this code has greatly improved the pipeline free span ultimate limit state and fatigue design by introducing more general procedures associated to more sophisticated numerical techniques. Later that same year the authors undertook a large project, in which the use of the aforementioned code was a contractual requirement. If on one hand, however, the owner insisted upon the use of the new Dn V code, on the other he was not willing to accept the very short free span limits, which were resulting from the calculations. This does not necessarily imply that the new code was wrong, because it could be, that previous codes had overestimated the allowable spans, but, in addition to the short spans, it was also found that the new code has some limits of applicability, which, basically, exclude a large range of common pipeline sizes. Because of this the authors were forced to look at the problem in further depth, thus resulting interesting conclusions, which will be presented in this paper. These point out some conservative aspects of the code, and make suggestions as to how these can be overcome in order to use the Dn V safety approach and still produce larger spans, by properly focusing on the frees pan buckling problem.

Author(s):  
Ю. Г. Москалькова ◽  
С. В. Данилов ◽  
В. А. Ржевуцкая

Постановка задачи. Исследуется метод усиления железобетонных колонн устройством стальной обоймы с обетонированием, который позволяет восстанавливать эксплуатационные показатели колонн, имеющих значительные дефекты и повреждения. Предпосылкой настоящих исследований явилось предположение о том, что усиление стальной обоймой с обетонированием является эффективным способом повышения несущей способности железобетонных колонн, причем вариант приложения нагрузки - только на бетонное ядро или ко всему сечению - существенно на эффективность усиления не влияет. В связи с этим целью исследования является определение необходимости устройства стального оголовка и включения в работу ветвей стальной обоймы при условии обетонирования стержня колонны по всей высоте. Результаты и выводы. Рациональным признан способ передачи нагрузки только на бетонное ядро усиленных колонн, поскольку устройство оголовка стальной обоймы требует применения сложных конструктивно-технологических решений, но при этом дополнительно увеличивает несущую способность незначительно (согласно проведенным исследованиям менее чем на 10 %). Ввиду отсутствия необходимости устройства конструкций стального оголовка снижаются трудоемкость и сроки производства работ по усилению колонн. Statement of the problem. The method of strengthening reinforced concrete columns with a steel clipping and the concrete surfacing is investigated. This method allows one to repair the columns with significant defects and damage. The prerequisite for this study was the assumption of strengthening with a steel clipping and the concrete surfacing is an effective way to increase the ultimate limit state of reinforced concrete columns, furthermore, the option of applying the load (only to the concrete core or to the entire section) does not significantly affect the strengthening effectiveness. In this regard, the purpose of the investigation was to identify the need to include the steel jacketing in the work, on the condition the column is coated with concrete along with the entire height. Results and conclusions. The load transfer method only to the concrete core of the strengthened columns is recognized as rational since the device of the steel clipping head requires the use of complex structural and technological solutions, but at the same time additionally increases the ultimate limit state insignificantly (according to the studies by less than 10 %). Due to the absence of the need to establish structures of the steel jacketing head, the labor intensiveness and terms of work production on strengthening the columns are reduced.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Reichenbach ◽  
Benjamin Kromoser ◽  
Philipp Preinstorfer ◽  
Tobias Huber

<p>With the building industry being one of the main sources of carbon dioxide emission worldwide and concrete being the main construction material, new strategies have to be developed to reduce the carbon footprint thereof. The use of high-performance materials in structural concrete, as for example textile-reinforced concrete (TRC), seems to allow for a reduction of the resource consumption and the carbon emissions. The present paper addresses potential applications of TRC examining the global warming potential (GWP) of a rail platform barrier. The resource consumption is depicted in a parametrical study in terms of the necessary component height and reinforcement area considering both the serviceability limit state (SLS) as well as the ultimate limit state (ULS). The results clearly indicate an achievable reduction of the GWP during construction when using textile reinforcement made of high-performance fibres. Furthermore, an analysis of the European market was conducted to prove the availability of this new reinforcement type. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document