Avoiding Hydrogen Embrittlement Stress Cracking of Ferritic Austenitic Stainless Steels Under Cathodic Protection

Author(s):  
P. Woollin ◽  
A. Gregori

The paper presents the results of a programme designed to define the material, stress and environmental factors controlling sensitivity of ferritic-austenitic stainless steels to hydrogen embrittlement stress cracking when exposed to cathodic protection. Factors examined in small and large-scale tests include microstructural coarseness, phase balance and hardness of a range of parent steels and welds. The results are presented in terms of threshold strain and normalised stress to develop hydrogen embrittlement stress cracks. The effects of microstructure and applied potential on crack initiation and propagation are described. Recommendations are made with respect to the strain/normalised stress levels for ferritic-austenitic steels under cathodic protection.

Author(s):  
Stig Wa¨stberg ◽  
Morten Solno̸rdal ◽  
Gustav Heiberg ◽  
Rikard To¨rnqvist ◽  
Pedro M. Vargas

Both 22Cr and 25Cr duplex (ferritic-austenitic) stainless steels have been extensively used for subsea equipment. In general the experience is good but some significant failures have occurred where Hydrogen Induced Stress Cracking (HISC) have been identified as a contributing factor. Because of these failures there was identified a need within the offshore industry for a design guideline treating HISC as a failure mode and reflecting best practice based on today’s knowledge, experience from in-service failures and recent research. The paper starts with a brief review of some of the failures and the main results from the comprehensive test program in the HISC JIP conducted in cooperation between Sintef and DNV. The JIP is supported by several major oil companies, subsea contractors and material suppliers and constitute the main scientific background for the recently issued Recommended Practice, DNV-RP-F112, Design of Duplex Stainless Steel Subsea Equipment Exposed to Cathodic Protection (October 2008).


Author(s):  
Hyung-Seop Shin ◽  
Kyung-Oh Bae ◽  
Hyuckmin Kim ◽  
Un-Bong Baek ◽  
Seung-Hoon Nahm

Abstract In this study, a simple screening technique using an in-situ small-punch (SP) test and based on the hydrogen embrittlement (HE) sensitivity of austenitic stainless steels was developed for use in hydrogen energy facilities. To investigate the HE behaviors of metallic materials, the in-situ SP tests were carried out under high-pressure hydrogen gas environments. The reductions of thickness at the fractured parts of the specimen were measured. The relative reductions of thickness (RRT) were determined after conducting SP tests in both hydrogen and inert gas environments. Similar to the relative reduction of area (RRA) obtained using the slow strain-rate tensile test, RRT obtained using the in-situ SP test is a quantitative measure of the influence of the HE behaviors. The influence of punch velocity on HE sensitivity was examined. The HE behaviors of austenitic steels were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. The high-Mn steels were also evaluated because they are candidates for storage and transportation of hydrogen gas. A screening technique for determining the practical environmental conditions at the point of use could be established by confirming the effectiveness of the influencing factor, RRT, using this in-situ SP test method.


2013 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Heikki Pulkkinen ◽  
Suvi Papula ◽  
Olga Todoshchenko ◽  
Juho Talonen ◽  
Hannu Hänninen

CORROSION ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (11) ◽  
pp. 115004-115004-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
GØ Lauvstad ◽  
R. Johnsen ◽  
I. Asbjørnsen ◽  
M. Bjurström ◽  
C.-G. Hjorth

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (39) ◽  
pp. 13635-13642 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.P. Phaniraj ◽  
Han-Jin Kim ◽  
Jin-Yoo Suh ◽  
Jae-Hyeok Shim ◽  
Seong-Jun Park ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 101-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.E. Moller

Moller, G.E., International Nickel Co., Inc., Torrance, Calif. Abstract Austenitic stainless steels are providing excellent trouble-free service in sea water for pumps, propellers, valves. and other marine equipment. propellers, valves. and other marine equipment. Occasionally, a failure occurs as the result of deep localized pitting in a crevice. Data are given showing that austenitic, ferritic. and martensitic stainless steels suffer pitting in crevices and under deposits in quiescent sea water. Austenitic stainless steels remain free from attack in high-velocity sea water. Low-purity ferritic and the martensitic stainless steels frequently pit in high-velocity sea water. Crevice corrosion can be controlled effectively with cathodic protection from iron, zinc. aluminum or magnesium galvanic anodes or impressed current cathodic protection by polarization to -0.6 v vs Calomel. Austenitic stainless steel performs well in many situations because it is a component of a multi-alloy assembly utilizing iron or steel. Examples from field experience arc given. Introduction During the past decade, there has been a growing use of austenitic stainless steel in marine equipment. Most applications have been successful but an unexpected failure has been observed occasionally. It is the purpose of this paper to describe when and how to use austenitic stainless steel with success. The selection of stainless steels appears to result from the engineering requirements of new, advanced, high-speed, high-reliability commercial, pleasure, and military craft. Ocean science and pleasure, and military craft. Ocean science and engineering, offshore oil production, fishing, and ocean mining are also contributing to the selection of stainless steels for sea-water applications. The increasing use of stainless steel in the marine environment is found in work-boat propellers, pump components, bow thrusters, valves, shafting pump components, bow thrusters, valves, shafting and shaft components, through-hull fittings, parts on data-gathering buoys, fasteners, and housings of oceanographic instruments. When austenitic stainless steel has given good, corrosion-free service, it is most often found to be used as a key component in a multi component, multi-alloy assembly or system receiving the benefit of built-in cathodic protection. For example, in Fig. 1 a cast Type 304 (Alloy Casting Institute CF-4) propeller is being used on a steel seagoing tugboat with zinc anodes attached to the rudder. Fig. 2 shows a cast ACI CE-30 power-plant sea-water circulation-pump impeller free power-plant sea-water circulation-pump impeller free of any corrosion after 6 years of service that was used in combination with an austenitic cast-iron suction bell and diffuser. SPEJ p. 101


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document