Variable Damping Profiles for Laser Shock Peening Simulation Using Modal Analysis and the SEATD Method

Author(s):  
Mohammad I. Hatamleh ◽  
Jagannathan Shankar Mahadevan ◽  
Arif S. Malik ◽  
Dong Qian

Laser shock peening (LSP) is a surface engineering technique, which aims to increase the fatigue life of various metallic components by inducing compressive residual stress at or near their surface. The finite element method (FEM) is used to identify the most suitable parameters in LSP. Various explicit analyses with artificial material damping are used to attain quasistatic equilibrium between laser shots. Dynamic relaxation (DR) is a well-known conventional technique that uses constant artificial damping to settle an excited model to quasi-static equilibrium. In contrast, the recently developed “Single Explicit Analysis using Time-Dependent Damping” (SEATD) method employs variable damping and performs better in terms of simulation time and accuracy. While recent study has shown that a variable damping profile used in the SEATD technique is beneficial for an LSP set up, identifying the most suitable variable damping profile in general is still ambiguous, given the variety of possible set-ups and boundary conditions. In this paper, a systematic procedure to strive for the best variable damping profile is developed, based on the excited modal parameters of the model. The simulation results are compared with those of an optimum constant damping profile developed using the conventional dynamic relaxation technique, as well as for the best variable damping profile based on exhaustive trial-and-error. The simulation case studies involve circular LSP shot(s) of 5.5 mm diameter spot size applied to Al 2024-T351 aluminum alloy plate under different boundary conditions. Dissipation rates of stain energy, kinetic energy, and total energy and the accuracy of surface residual stresses are investigated to compare the performance of different damping profiles. The results indicate that the proposed method involving modal analysis to systematically identify a variable damping profile, to promote simulation efficiency, appears to work well.

Author(s):  
Mohammad I. Hatamleh ◽  
Jagannathan Mahadevan ◽  
Arif Malik ◽  
Dong Qian

The single explicit analysis using time-dependent damping (SEATD) technique for laser shock peening (LSP) simulation employs variable damping to relax the excited model between laser shots, thus distinguishing it from conventional optimum constant damping methods. Dynamic relaxation (DR) is the well-established conventional technique that mathematically identifies the optimum constant damping coefficient and incremental time-step that guarantees stability and convergence while damping all mode shapes uniformly when bringing a model to quasi-static equilibrium. Examined in this research is a new systematic procedure to strive for a more effective, time-dependent variable damping profile for general LSP configurations and boundary conditions, based on excited modal parameters of a given laser-shocked system. The effects of increasing the number of mode shapes and selecting modes by contributed effective masses are studied, and a procedure to identify the most efficient variable damping profile is designed. Two different simulation cases are studied. It is found that the computational time is reduced by up to 25% (62.5 min) for just five laser shots using the presented variable damping method versus conventional optimum constant damping. Since LSP typically involved hundreds of shots, the accumulated savings in computation time during prediction of desired process parameters is significant.


2017 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 523-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Shukla ◽  
S. Robertson ◽  
H. Wu ◽  
A. Telang ◽  
M. Kattoura ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (13) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sticchi ◽  
P. Staron ◽  
Y. Sano ◽  
M. Meixer ◽  
M. Klaus ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 335 ◽  
pp. 32-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaopeng Tong ◽  
Xudong Ren ◽  
Yunpeng Ren ◽  
Fengze Dai ◽  
Yunxia Ye ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. Shtereveria ◽  
A. A. Volkova ◽  
A. A. Kholopov ◽  
M. A. Melnikova ◽  
D. M. Melnikov

2016 ◽  
Vol 108-109 ◽  
pp. 104-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Wang ◽  
Xiaogui Wang ◽  
Yangjian Xu ◽  
Zengliang Gao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document