Development of Pipeline Sleeve End Fillet Weld Stress Intensity Factor and Reference Stress Solutions for Fatigue and Failure Assessment

Author(s):  
Vlad Semiga ◽  
Aaron Dinovitzer ◽  
Amin Eshraghi ◽  
Robert Lazor

Pipeline defects such as cracks, dents and corrosion often require permanent pressure retaining repairs. Full encirclement metallic repair sleeves with fillet-welded end connections to the pipeline are often used for this purpose. In-service failures have occurred at pressure retaining sleeves as a result of defects associated with the sleeve welds, such as hydrogen-induced cracks, undercut at the fillet welds and inadequate weld size. At present, accurate quantitative fitness for service assessments for circumferential defects in a sleeve fillet welds are difficult to carry out due to a lack of detailed stress intensity factor (SIF) solutions for finite length cracks. The primary objective of the project presented in this paper [1] was to develop flaw acceptance criteria which will fill gaps in the available Engineering Critical Assessment procedures for metallic sleeve repairs on all grades of pipelines. SIF solutions for finite length sleeve-end fillet weld toe and root cracks were generated and used to develop parametric equations suitable for carrying out defect assessments. These equations can be used in the assessment of fatigue crack growth and/or fracture using failure assessment diagram (FAD) methods at sleeve end fillets alongside the results developed for other structural geometries in national standards. The equations were developed based on detailed finite element (FE) analyses of a wide range of sleeve end fillet weld cracking scenarios to estimate the SIFs at both the deepest point and the surface breaking point along the crack front.

Author(s):  
Ali Mirzaee Sisan ◽  
Isabel Hadley ◽  
Sarah E. Smith ◽  
Mike Smith

This paper reviews different stress intensity factor solutions for a wide range of configurations and loading conditions for a cylinder with axial and circumferential through thickness cracks and a sphere with through thickness meridional (equatorial) cracks. The most appropriate solutions to use are identified.


Author(s):  
Jan G. M. Keltjens

The paper discusses the differences between API 579-1/ASME FFS-1-1/ASME FFS-1 [1] and ASME Section VIII Division 3 [2] stress intensity factor solutions. In addition to this, the use of the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) in leak before burst analysis is compared to the present Division 3 approach. The paper contains the background of both approaches and a worked example demonstrating the effect of both methods. Finally, a simplified fatigue crack growth based life time study is presented.


Author(s):  
Patrick Le Delliou ◽  
Stéphane Chapuliot

Analytical evaluation procedures for determining the acceptability of flaw detected during in-service inspection of nuclear power plant components are provided in Appendix 5.4 of the French RSE-M Code. Linear elastic fracture mechanics based evaluation procedures require calculation of the stress intensity factor (SIF). In Appendix 5.4 of the RSE-M Code, influence coefficients needed to compute the SIF are provided for a wide range of surface axial or circumferential flaws in cylinders, the through-wall stress field being represented by a cubic equation. On the other hand, Appendix C of API 579-1 FFS procedure provides also a very complete set of influence coefficients. The paper presents the comparison of the influence coefficients from both documents, focused on axial ID semi-elliptical surface flaws in cylinders. The cylinder and crack geometries are represented by three ratios: Ri/t, a/t, and a/c, where Ri, t, a, and c are respectively the inner radius, the wall thickness, the crack depth and one-half of the crack length. The solutions for the coefficients G0 and G1 at the deepest point and at the surface point are investigated. At the deepest point, the agreement between the solutions is good, the relative difference being lower than 2 %, except for the plate (Ri/t = ∞) at a/c = 0.125 and 0.0625 and a/t = 0.8 (around 5 %). At the surface point, the agreement between both solutions is not so good. At this point, the relative differences depend strongly on the a/c ratio, being larger for elongated cracks (with low a/c ratios). However, it must be recalled that the absolute values of the coefficients are low at the surface point for elongated cracks, and that for these cracks the critical point regarding the stress intensity factor is the deepest point.


1980 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 314 ◽  
Author(s):  
KC Lieb ◽  
R Horstman ◽  
KA Peters ◽  
RL Meltzer ◽  
MB Vieth ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 17 (76) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Smith

AbstractThe elastic stress intensity factor is a parameter used in fracture mechanics to describe stress conditions in the vicinity of the tip of a sharp crack. By superimposing solutions of stress intensity factors for different loading conditions, equations are derived which model crevasses in ice. Solutions are presented for the theoretical depth of isolated crevasses, free from or partially filled with water. Close agreement exists with a previous calculation by Weertman using a different technique. The effect of crevasse spacing is investigated and it is demonstrated that closer spacing always reduces crevasse depth, but over a wide range of spacing the predicted variation in depth is slight.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document