Development of a Magnetic Eddy Current In-Line Inspection Tool

Author(s):  
Stefanie L. Asher ◽  
Andreas Boenisch ◽  
Konrad Reber

Pipeline in-line inspections (ILI) are one of the primary methods used to assess the integrity of operating oil and gas pipelines. Conventional ILI technology is based on ultrasonic testing (UT) or magnetic flux leakage (MFL) sensors. Although these technologies are suitable for most pipeline inspections, there remains an opportunity to expand ILI technology and application. ExxonMobil and Innospection Ltd. are working to develop a new ILI sensor technology based on a combination of Magnetic Eddy Current (MEC) and multi-differential eddy current. This new technology provides the potential to detect small volumetric features, inspect heavy wall gas pipelines, and inspect pipelines with corrosion resistant alloy (CRA) or non-metallic liners. Initial feasibility trials were conducted with a prototype ILI MEC tool. Tests were conducted on an 8.625” (219 mm) X65 carbon steel pipe lined with 0.118” (3 mm) of Inconel 825 pipe. Four types of defects were machined into the pipe to represent natural defects anticipated in service: • Metal loss features from 3 to 24 mm in diameter on the external surface of the carbon steel base pipe • Erosion on the internal layer of the CRA liner • Internal girth weld crack-like defects • Metal loss defects at the interface of the CRA and carbon steel Over 80 pull tests were conducted to determine the detection capabilities and speed sensitivities of the tool. Defects were detected by the sensors including the very small (<10 mm) pinhole-type features. Signals were analyzed by a preliminary sizing algorithm to demonstrate proof of concept. Detection performance was not affected at speeds up to 0.75 m/s. Since detection capabilities exceeded expectations, future development will continue based on the current prototype.

1998 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Shadley ◽  
E. F. Rybicki ◽  
S. A. Shirazi ◽  
E. Dayalan

CO2 corrosion in carbon steel piping systems can be severe depending on a number of factors including CO2 content, water chemistry, temperature, and percent water cut. For many oil and gas production conditions, corrosion products can form a protective scale on interior surfaces of the piping. In these situations, metal loss rates can reduce to below design allowances. But, if sand is entrained in the flow, sand particles impinging on pipe surfaces can remove the scale or prevent it from forming at localized areas of particle impingement. This process is referred to as “erosion-corrosion” and can lead to high metal loss rates. In some cases, penetration rates can be extremely high due to pitting. This paper combines laboratory test data on erosion-corrosion with an erosion prediction computational model to compute flow velocity limits (“threshold velocities”) for avoiding erosion-corrosion in carbon steel piping. Also discussed is how threshold velocities can be shifted upward by using a corrosion inhibitor.


2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. N. Veselov ◽  
I. Yu. Pyshmintsev ◽  
K. A. Laev ◽  
S. Yu. Zhukova

Author(s):  
Stefanie L. Asher ◽  
Justin M. Crapps

Pipeline in-line inspections (ILI) are one of the primary methods used to assess the integrity of operating oil and gas pipelines. These inspections can be complicated to conduct due to a variety of reasons ranging from operational limits (high/low flow velocity, wall thickness, pipeline extreme depth or pressure, etc.) to limits inherent to the inspection technology. Often these complexities are overcome with tools customized to a specific pipeline. Although this has been effective for singular pipeline inspections, a more industry-wide approach should be considered to develop broader solutions. This paper discusses the opportunities to enhance ILI and suggests a ranking of priorities for technology development.


Author(s):  
Herbert Willems ◽  
Beate Jaskolla ◽  
Thorsten Sickinger ◽  
Alfred Barbian ◽  
Frank Niese

The two prevailing technologies in in-line inspection (ILI) of pipelines used for metal loss detection are magnetic flux leakage (MFL) and ultrasonic testing (UT). The ultrasonic method provides a more precise depth sizing as a direct measurement of the remaining thickness of the pipe wall is obtained. The advantage of providing more precise defect data leads, in turn, to a more accurate and reliable defect assessment thus reducing follow-up costs for the pipeline operator. As conventional ultrasonic tools, which are based on piezoelectric transducers, require a liquid coupling medium to couple the ultrasonic energy into the pipe wall, this technology is readily applicable to the majority of liquids pipelines, but not to gas pipelines (unless a batch of liquid is used). In order to apply ultrasonic ILI technology for metal loss inspection to gas pipelines directly, a new tool was developed based on the EMAT (electro-magnetic acoustic transducer) principle by which ultrasound is generated in the surface of the pipe wall through electromagnetic interaction. EMAT sensors utilize coils for sending and receiving ultrasound. Since coils can also be used to pick up MFL signals and eddy current signals, the sensors were designed such that, apart from the ultrasonic signals, these additional signals are recorded simultaneously. The availability of three simultaneous, independent measurements allows for considerable improvement with regard to both defect sizing and feature discrimination. In the paper, the new sensor concept and the setup of the ILI tool are described. First results are presented and discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document