Determination of J Resistance Curves From CWP Specimens

Author(s):  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Honggang Zhou ◽  
Yong-Yi Wang ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
Yaxin Song

A crack is highly constrained in traditional toughness tests, e.g., CVN and SE(B). However, a crack in the girth welds of pipelines under longitudinal loading is low constrained. Curved wide plate (CWP) test provides similar constraint condition as that of pipeline girth weld. CWP tests are being used recently for strain-based design. One of the desirable outcomes from those tests is fracture toughness resistance curves. The resistance curve consists of two components, the crack growth and the toughness measure, such as J-integral or CTOD. The paper describes the development of procedures for the determination of those two components. A normalized equation was developed to estimate the crack growth from the experimentally measured unloading compliance. The equation was verified by multiple FEA simulations with different pipe geometries and materials. The second set of equations was developed to evaluate the J-integral through an incremental frame based on the instantaneous crack growth and the load-CMOD record. The application of the resistance curve procedures was demonstrated through CWP tests of X80 and X100 welds.

Author(s):  
Sebastian Cravero ◽  
Claudio Ruggieri

Laboratory testing of fracture specimens to measure resistance curves (J-Δa) have focused primarily on the unloading compliance method using a single specimen. Current estimation procedures (which form the basis of ASTM 1820 standard) employ load line displacement (LLD) records to measure fracture toughness resistance data incorporating a crack growth correction for J. An alternative method which potentially simplifies the test procedure involves the use of crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) to determine both crack growth and J. This study provides further developments of the evaluation procedure for J in cracked bodies that experience ductile crack growth based upon the eta-method and CMOD data. The methodology broadens the applicability of current standards adopting the unloading compliance technique in laboratory measurements of fracture toughness resistance data (J resistance curves). The developed J evaluation formulation for growing cracks based on CMOD data provides a viable and yet simpler test technique to measure crack growth resistance data for ductile materials.


Author(s):  
Ju-Yeon Kang ◽  
Youn-Young Jang ◽  
Nam-Su Huh ◽  
Ki-Seok Kim ◽  
Woo-Yeon Cho

Crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) and J-integral have been used for elastic-plastic fracture parameters as a crack driving force (CDF) and crack resistance curve to evaluate tensile strain capacity (TSC) of cracked pipelines based on strain-based design (SBD). The TSC can be determined by using two kinds of failure criteria. One is based on the limit state corresponding to an onset of stable crack growth and the other is tangency approach which determines an onset of unstable crack growth by comparing crack driving force and resistance curve. For this reason, the accurate calculation of crack driving force and crack resistance curve is highly required to determine TSC. In the present study, the TSCs for X70 pipelines with a circumferential semi-elliptical surface crack were estimated based on both crack initiation and ductile tearing criteria using crack driving force diagram (CDFD) method. The CDF curves of cracked pipelines were calculated through the detailed elastic-plastic finite element (FE) analyses. Crack resistance curves were obtained from experimental data of single edged notch tension (SENT) specimens. Both the CDF and crack resistance curves were represented using CTOD and J-integral, respectively. As for loading conditions, axial strain and internal pressure were considered. The TSCs based on CTOD were compared with those based on J-integral to investigate the effect of choice of the fracture parameters on TSC. From the FE results, the TSCs based on ductile tearing allowed higher TSCs than those based on crack initiation. Although there were some differences between the TSCs using CTOD and J-integral, the effect of choice of fracture parameter on TSC with internal pressure was not significant.


Author(s):  
Sebastian Cravero ◽  
Claudio Ruggieri

Laboratory testing of fracture specimens to measure resistance curves (J - Δa) have focused primarily on the unloading compliance method using a single specimen. Current estimation procedures (which form the basis of ASTM E1820 standard) employ load line displacement (LLD) records to measure fracture toughness resistance data incorporating a crack growth correction for J. An alternative method which potentially simplifies the test procedure involves the use of crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) to determine both crack growth and J. This study provides further developments of the evaluation procedure for J in cracked bodies that experience ductile crack growth based upon the eta-method and CMOD data. The methodology broadens the applicability of current standards adopting the unloading compliance technique in laboratory measurements of fracture toughness resistance data (J resistance curves). The developed J evaluation formulation for growing cracks based on CMOD data provides a viable and yet simpler test technique to measure crack growth resistance data for ductile materials.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pothana ◽  
G. Wilkowski ◽  
S. Kalyanam ◽  
J. K. Hong ◽  
C. J. Sallaberry

Abstract A new approach was implemented to confirm the start of ductile tearing relative to assessments by other methods such as direct-current Electric Potential (d-c EP) method in coupon specimens. This approach was developed on the Key-Curve methodology by Ernst/Joyce and is similar to the ASTM E-1820 Load Normalization procedure used to determine J-R curves directly from load versus Load-Line Displacement (LLD) record of the test specimen. It is consistent with Deformation Plasticity relationships for fully plastic behavior. Using this Experimental Key-Curve method, crack initiation can be determined directly from load versus LLD data or load versus Crack-Mouth Opening Displacement (CMOD) obtained from a fracture test without the need for additional instrumentation required for crack initiation detection. It is based on the fact that plastic deformation of homogeneous metals at the crack tip follows a power-law function until the crack tearing initiates. Crack tearing initiation is determined at the point where the power-law fit to the load versus plastic part of CMOD or LLD curve deviates from the total experimental load versus plastic-CMOD or LLD curve. The procedure for fitting of the data requires some care to be exercised such that the fitted data is beyond the elastic region and early small-scale plastic region of the Load-CMOD or Load-LLD curve but include data before crack initiation. An iterative regression analysis was done to achieve this, which is shown in this paper. The iterative fitting in this region typically results with a coefficient of determination (R2) values that are greater than 0.990. This method can be either used in conjunction with other methods such as direct-current Electric Potential (d-c EP) or unloading-compliance methods as a secondary (or primary) confirmation of crack tearing initiation (and even for crack growth); or can be used alone when other methods cannot be used. Furthermore, when using instrumentation methods for determining crack-initiation such as d-c EP method in a fracture toughness test, it is good to have a secondary confirmation of the initiation point in case of instrumentation malfunction or high signal to noise ratio in the measured d-c EP signals. In addition, the Experimental Key-Curve procedure provides relatively smooth data for the fitting procedure, while unloading-compliance data when used to get small crack growth values frequently has significant variability, which is part of the reason that JIC by ASTM E1820 is determined using an offset with some growth past the very start of ductile tearing. In this work, the Experimental Key-Curve method had been successfully used to determine crack tearing initiation and demonstrate the applicability for different fracture toughness specimen geometries such as SEN(T), and C(T) specimens. In all the cases analyzed, the Experimental Key-Curve method gave consistent results that were in good agreement with other crack tearing initiation measuring method such as d-c EP but seemed to result in less scatter.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Nicholas Ohms ◽  
Diego Belato Rosado ◽  
Wim De Waele

Pipelines in harsh environments may be subjected to large deformations. Classic stress-based design needs to be complemented with strain-based design. An important parameter in the design is the crack growth resistance. SENT testing (Single Edge Notch Tension) allows to determine the so-called material’s tearing resistance curve. Very recently the first standard on SENT testing, BS 8571:2014, has been published. SENT testing is however still subject to extensive research and different approaches with respect to eg. notch placement, crack extension measurement and analysis exist. In this paper two methods for calculating crack extension based on the unloading compliance procedure are used and compared, proving that they show little difference. This is performed on an API-5L X70 steel grade and this for different configurations, namely an inner diameter notch and a through thickness notch. The results showed little difference between the different configurations, although the inner diameter showed higher crack growth resistance. Furthermore, the results are compared to visual observations of the fracture surfaces and a hardness map. The fracture surfaces corresponded to the obtained resistance curves. However, no real correlation between the hardness map and the other results could be seen.


1993 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 634-645
Author(s):  
N. Nakajima ◽  
J. L. Liu

Abstract The effect of gel on the fracture toughness of four PVC/NBR (50/50) blends was characterized by two different J- integral methods. Three of these blends are compatible blends with 33% acrylonitrile in NBRs, and the fourth with 21% acrylonitrile content, is an incompatible blend. Two types of gel are involved in this study microgels and macrogels. The J-integral methods are (1) conventional method proposed by Bagley and Landes and (2) crack initiation locus method proposed by Kim and Joe. The same load-displacement curves are used in both methods. However, the latter eliminates the energy dissipation away from the crack tip in the determination of Jc, while the former does not. Both methods produced almost the same results indicating that the energy dissipation away from the crack tip is negligible in these samples. The fracture toughness of a macrogel-containing blend is much greater than that of a microgel-containing blend, which, in turn, is only slightly greater than that of a gel-free blend. This implies that the two gel-containing blends have different fracture processes. The incompatible blend has the lowest fracture toughness due to weak interaction at the boundaries of the two phases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 795 ◽  
pp. 165-171
Author(s):  
Wu Lin Wang ◽  
Du Wei Wang ◽  
Kai Shu Guan

Fracture toughness empirical correlation between SPT(Small Punch Test) with non-crack sample and standard fracture toughness test has been established in recent years. In order to compensate the imperfection of empirical correlation, such as absence theoretical basis, poor repeatability and universality, in this paper, an O-type pre-cracked sample was adopted to evaluate fracture toughness. The mechanical model of the sample is in compliance with plane strain condition in the direction of crack propagation. In this paper a determination procedure was studied and established, and the J-integral of steel Q345R was calculated using the procedure.


1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
RT Horstman ◽  
KC Lieb ◽  
RL Meltzer ◽  
MB Vieth ◽  
GA Clarke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document