A Guideline: Using or Creating Incident Databases for Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines

Author(s):  
R. Bolt ◽  
A. Hilgenstock ◽  
C. Kolovich ◽  
D. Velez Vega ◽  
A. Cappanera ◽  
...  

This report details the work undertaken by the International Gas Union (IGU) Study Group 3.4 during the triennium 2003–2006. The initiative that launched this work came during the 22nd World Gas Conference where it was noticed that use of pipeline incident information often is not fit for purpose. A comparative analysis has been carried out considering the most frequently used and reliable high pressure gas pipeline incident databases. The four main objectives of the analysis were to determine the differences and similarities of existing databases, create a reference model to be used when developing a new pipeline incident database, assess if harmonization of existing databases is possible and to provide recommendations regarding the above.

2021 ◽  
Vol 343 ◽  
pp. 09005
Author(s):  
Ion Foidaş ◽  
Florin Marius Bîrsan

The paper shows a comparison between two intervention methods for interconnecting two gas transmission pipelines within a natural gas transmission system. One intervention implies shutdown of pipelines, while the other one in-service pipelines. Each method is described in detail along with the main technological issues, as well as the related advantages and disadvantages. The technological procedures imply special working techniques such as welding or hot tapping in service pipelines.


Author(s):  
Michael R. Acton ◽  
Philip J. Baldwin

For most fuels transported by pipeline, whether or not ignition of an accidental release occurs is a critical factor in determining the extent of the resulting hazard. The probability of ignition is therefore a key input when undertaking pipeline risk assessments and the value chosen is a direct multiplier of the risk calculated. Typically, the ignition probability assigned is based on an analysis of historical data. However, the pipeline industry has a good safety record and major incidents are rare, sometimes resulting in widely differing values being used due to the scarcity of reliable data. For high pressure natural gas transmission pipelines, it is observed that ruptures of large diameter underground pipelines operating at high pressures can result in ignited releases even in remote areas with no obvious ignition sources present. Conversely, failures of small diameter pipelines operating at lower pressures rarely result in ignited releases, suggesting that ignition sources generated as a result of the failure event itself may be significant in causing ignition of high pressure natural gas releases from underground pipelines. The results of analysis previously reported at IPC2002 indicated a trend for the ignition probability to increase with pd2, with p the pipeline operating pressure (bar) and d the pipeline diameter (m). The relationship forms the basis of the default ignition probabilities recommended for use in the PIPESAFE package developed for risk assessment of gas transmission pipelines. Since the previous study was carried out, the number of pipeline rupture incidents in the dataset used has increased by about 20%, and following a recent review, the statistical analysis has been extended and refined. This paper reports the results of recent analysis of the most comprehensive incident dataset available to Advantica for natural gas transmission pipelines, presenting the correlation derived from a simple statistical analysis together with consideration of possible physical explanations for the trends observed based on an ongoing programme of research into the causes of ignition.


Author(s):  
David Cheng

Abstract Data from the DCS systems provides important information about the performance and transportation efficiency of a gas pipeline with compressor stations. The pipeline performance data provides correction factors for compressors as part of the operation optimization of natural gas transmission pipelines. This paper presents methods, procedure, and a real life example of model validation based performance analysis of gas pipeline. Statistic methods are demonstrated with real gas pipeline measurement data. The methods offer practical ways to validate the pipeline hydraulics model using the DCS data. The validated models are then used as performance analysis tools in evaluating the fundamental physical parameters and assessing the pipeline hydraulics conditions for potential issues influencing pressure drops in the pipeline such as corrosion (ID change), roughness changes, or BSW deposition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document