scholarly journals Pipeline Inspection and Rehabilitation Using Clock Spring®

Author(s):  
Patrick C. Porter ◽  
Jesse L. Mitchell

This paper reviews the Clock Spring® repair system showing how it works and how it can be an effective component of a pipeline integrity program. It also outlines a Pipeline Integrity Program that is effective for TEPPCO and can be helpful to pipeline operators in the development of other pipeline integrity programs. Using high-resolution magnetic flux leakage inspection tools and the Clock Spring® pipeline repair system, TEPPCO’s ten-year pipeline integrity program is ahead of schedule and significantly under budget. The use of advanced technology, combined with efficient planning, has yielded a unique systematic approach to pipeline integrity enhancement.

Author(s):  
Vinicius de C. Lima ◽  
Jose´ A. P. da Silva ◽  
Jean Pierre von der Weid ◽  
Claudio Soligo Camerini ◽  
Carlos H. F. de Oliveira

A result of a research partnership between Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro – PUC-Rio, PETROBRAS and PIPEWAY is presented: The development of an innovative sensor head for high resolution MFL Pigs, the GMD sensor, Geometric Magnetic and Discriminator. This head makes high resolution magnetic pipeline readings using the MFL - Magnetic Flux Leakage technique, with the addition of geometric readings and the outside/inside defects discriminations. This technique makes possible, with only one crown of GMD sensors, the caliper, metal loss and outside/inside discrimination pipeline inspection. Technical aspects of the development, e.g.: the construction details of the sensor, evaluation tests and laboratory results are also presented.


1996 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 1581-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Katragadda ◽  
W. Lord ◽  
Y.S. Sun ◽  
S. Udpa ◽  
L. Udpa

2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 3073-3084 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Khodayari-Rostamabad ◽  
J.P. Reilly ◽  
N.K. Nikolova ◽  
J.R. Hare ◽  
S. Pasha

Author(s):  
David J. Warman ◽  
Dennis Johnston ◽  
John D. Mackenzie ◽  
Steve Rapp ◽  
Bob Travers

This paper describes an approach used by Duke Energy Gas Transmission (DEGT) to manage dents and mechanical damage as part of its overall Integrity Management Plan (IMP). The approach provides guidance in the process for evaluating deformation anomalies that are detected by high resolution magnetic flux leakage (HR-MFL) and multi-channel geometry in-line inspection tools, the process to determine which deformations will be selected for excavation, the process to conduct pipeline field excavations, assessments, and repairs for pipeline integrity purposes. This approach was developed, tested and fully implemented during pipeline integrity work over a two year program involving over 1,100 miles of HR-MFL and 900 miles of geometry in-line inspection. Integration of data from high resolution ILI tools (HR-MFL and multi-channel deformation tools) was used to identify and characterize dents and mechanical damage in the pipeline system. From subsequent field assessments and correlation with ILI results, the processes were refined and field procedures developed. The new guidance provided in the 2003 edition of ASME B31.8 was used as the governing assessment criteria.


Author(s):  
Kevin W. Ferguson

With the age of the original Panhandle Eastern Pipeline (PEPL) Company pipelines, it’s not a matter of if anomalies will be found when an ILI tool is run, it’s a matter of how many and how severe. When a final report is received from an ILI vendor, burst pressures are typically calculated using Modified B31G, 0.85dL. The results can seem unmanageable, but success has been had doing further assessments on some anomalies without excavating them all. This assessment has been developed and performed by PEPL on three sets of Tuboscope ILI data and one set of Baker Hughes CPIG data. The method to be discussed was first employed in 2002. It provides a more accurate characterization of the defect and provides the company the ability to more effectively allocate resources. Efforts have been made to review the color scan of a vendor’s raw High Resolution Magnetic Flux Leakage (HRMFL) data, and perform an assessment using Effective Area Analysis without excavating hundreds of anomalies that prove no threat to the pipeline. This assessment is done by hand on the computer and in many cases returns a burst pressure higher than that calculated using Modified B31G, 0.85dL. The following is a case study that shows how multiple defects have been assessed prior to excavation in an attempt to more accurately characterize the defect, and allow for a better allocation of resources. Digs have been performed to validate the process, and the results will be discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document