Determining the Lewis Factor for Plastic Spur Gears With Asymmetric Teeth

Author(s):  
J. L. Moya ◽  
A. S. Machado ◽  
A. M. Becerra ◽  
J. A. Vela´zquez ◽  
R. Goytisolo

The basic weakness of plastic spur gear teeth is tooth fracture brought on by the accumulation of stress at the root of the tooth and by the geometry of the tooth. Tooth width and height play a major role in failure, as does the Lewis factor, which has a direct effect on the expression to calculate tooth strength. This study describes a theoretical analysis of a procedure to determine the Lewis factor for asymmetric teeth.

1990 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 590-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Steward

In this paper, the requirements for an accurate 3D model of the tooth contact-line load distribution in real spur gears are summarized. The theoretical results (obtained by F.E.M.) for the point load compliance of wide-faced spur gear teeth are set out. These values compare well with experimental data obtained from tests on a large spur gear (18 mm module, 18 teeth).


2021 ◽  
Vol 263 (5) ◽  
pp. 1275-1285
Author(s):  
Joshua Götz ◽  
Sebastian Sepp ◽  
Michael Otto ◽  
Karsten Stahl

One important source of noise in drive trains are transmissions. In numerous applications, it is necessary to use helical instead of spur gear stages due to increased noise requirements. Besides a superior excitation behaviour, helical gears also show additional disadvantageous effects (e.g. axial forces and tilting moments), which have to be taken into account in the design process. Thus, a low noise spur gear stage could simplify design and meet the requirements of modern mechanical drive trains. The authors explore the possibility of combining the low noise properties of helical gears with the advantageous mechanical properties of spur gears by using spur gears with variable tip diameter along the tooth width. This allows the adjustment of the total length of active lines of action at the beginning and end of contact and acts as a mesh stiffness modification. For this reason, several spur gear designs are experimentally investigated and compared with regard to their excitation behaviour. The experiments are performed on a back-to-back test rig and include quasi-static transmission error measurements under load as well as dynamic torsional vibration measurements. The results show a significant improvement of the excitation behaviour for spur gears with variable tip diameter.


1981 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 466-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Yuruzume ◽  
H. Mizutani

Effects of addendum modification of tooth profiles on the bending fatigue strength of high speed spur gear are discussed in this presentation: A JIS Class O Spur gear of m3, α20 deg, Z1 27, and made of AMS 6260 (AISI 9310) steel precisely ground after carburizing and hardening was meshed with the other gear of Z2 77 and operated at 8550 rpm. In this running test, bending load capacity and running performance comparisons between the gear with standard tooth profile and the two shifted gears of which tooth addendum modification coefficients were 0.35 and 0.8. The maximum normal load of the gear with addendum modification coefficient 0.8 at 107 (10 million) cycles was 1.8 kNsmm per unit tooth width. The maximum Hertz stress of this gear was 2.43 × 109 Nsm2. The allowable normal load of the gear with 0.8 was higher than that of the standard gear by 87 percent and higher than of the 0.35 profile shifted gears by 20 percent.


1975 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. S. Akin ◽  
J. J. Mross ◽  
D. P. Townsend

Lubricant jet flow impingement and penetration depth into a gear tooth space were measured at 4920 and 2560 using a 8.89-cm- (3.5-in.) pitch dia 8 pitch spur gear at oil pressures from 7 × 104 to 41 × 104 N/m2 (10 psi to 60 psi). A high speed motion picture camera was used with xenon and high speed stroboscopic lights to slow down and stop the motion of the oil jet so that the impingement depth could be determined. An analytical model was developed for the vectorial impingement depth and for the impingement depth with tooth space windage effects included. The windage effects on the oil jet were small for oil drop size greater than 0.0076 cm (0.003 in.). The analytical impingement depth compared favorably with experimental results above an oil jet pressure of 7 × 104 N/m2 (10 psi). Some of this oil jet penetrates further into the tooth space after impingement. Much of this post impingement oil is thrown out of the tooth space without further contacting the gear teeth.


Author(s):  
Irebert R. Delgado ◽  
Michael J. Hurrell

Rotorcraft gearbox efficiencies are reduced at increased surface speeds due to viscous and impingement drag on the gear teeth. This windage power loss can affect overall mission range, payload, and frequency of transmission maintenance. Experimental and analytical studies on shrouding for single gears have shown it to be potentially effective in mitigating windage power loss. Efficiency studies on unshrouded meshed gears have shown the effect of speed, oil viscosity, temperature, load, lubrication scheme, etc. on gear windage power loss. The open literature does not contain experimental test data on shrouded meshed spur gears. Gear windage power loss test results are presented on shrouded meshed spur gears at elevated oil inlet temperatures and constant oil pressure both with and without shrouding. Shroud effectiveness is compared at four oil inlet temperatures. The results are compared to the available literature and follow-up work is outlined.


1974 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 583-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Townsend ◽  
E. V. Zaretsky

Tests were conducted at 350 K (170 deg F) with groups of 8.9 cm (3.5-in.)-pitch-diameter spur gear with and without tip relief made of consumable-electrode vacuum melted (CVM) Super Nitralloy (5Ni-2Al) and CVM AISI M-50 steel. The AISI M-50 gears without tip relief had lives approximately 50 percent longer than the Super Nitralloy gears without tip relief. However, the Super Nitralloy gears with tip relief had lives equal to the AISI M-50 gears without tip relief. The difference in lives were not statistically significant. All gears failed by classical pitting fatigue at the pitch circle. However, the AISI M-50 gears with tip relief failed by tooth fracture. AISI M-50 gear sets without tip relief having a spalled gear tooth which were deliberately overrun after spalling had occurred, failed by tooth fracture.


Machines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Fabio Bruzzone ◽  
Tommaso Maggi ◽  
Claudio Marcellini ◽  
Carlo Rosso

In this paper, a three-dimensional model for the estimation of the deflections, load sharing attributes, and contact conditions will be presented for pairs of meshing teeth in a spur gear transmission. A nonlinear iterative approach based on a semi-analytical formulation for the deformation of the teeth under load will be employed to accurately determine the point of application of the load, its intensity, and the number of contacting pairs without a priori assumptions. At the end of this iterative cycle the obtained deflected shapes are then employed to compute the pressure distributions through a contact mechanics model with non-Hertzian features and a technique capable of obtaining correct results even at the free edges of the finite length contacting bodies. This approach is then applied to a test case with excellent agreement with its finite element counterpart. Finally, several results are shown to highlight the influence on the quasi-static behavior of spur gears of different kinds and amounts of flank and face-width profile modifications.


Author(s):  
A. Ramamohana Rao ◽  
B. Srinivasulu

Abstract Performance of spur gears largely depends on the magnitude and nature of variation of dynamic loads occuring between mating teeth. Variable tooth mesh stiffness is one of the primary sources causing parametric excitations resulting in dynamic loads. The usual method of varying the mesh stiffness to reduce dynamic loads is to use high contact ratio and profile modified gears. In this paper, a new type of tooth design to improve the dynamic performance of spur gears is presented. In this, a through hole is drilled in each tooth in a direction parallel to the gear axis. The diameter of the hole and its position on the tooth centre line are variable. Such a gear is called a hollow gear. Dynamic analysis is carried out for the mesh of hollow pinions mating with solid gears. The results are compared with solid pinions (no holes in teeth) meshing with solid gears. Finite element method is used for the analysis. For estimation of the dynamic load variation in hollow-solid and solid-solid gear meshes, a model incorporating the varying mesh stiffness and damping of gear teeth is used. Governing differential equations are solved using unconditionally stable Newmark-beta algorithm. The dynamic loads obtained are used as an input time varying loads for the determination of dynamic fillet and hole stress response of solid and hollow gear teeth whichever is applicable. Modal superposition technique is used for transient response analysis. The study shows that for the same damping ratio, dynamic loads in hollow-solid meshes are nearly the same as in a solid-solid mesh. In reality, the dynamic loads in a hollow-solid mesh are less than a solid-solid mesh due to its inherent higher material damping.


Author(s):  
Xiaogen Su ◽  
Donald R. Houser

Abstract The effect of the reference misalignment including eccentricity and wobble on profile and lead inspection traces is discussed. The relative slopes of the lead traces induced by wobble are used to calculate the magnitude of the wobble. The deviation caused by the wobble is removed from the lead inspection results. This method is theoretically ‘exact’ for spur gears and is approximate for helical gears. Real measurement examples show this method produces a good result with a spur gear and a satisfactory result with a helical gear.


1981 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Cornell

The magnitude and variation of tooth pair compliance with load position affects the dynamics and loading significantly, and the tooth root stressing per load varies significantly with load position. Therefore, the recently developed time history, interactive, closed form solution for the dynamic tooth loads for both low and high contact ratio spur gears [1] was expanded to include improved and simplified methods for calculating the compliance and stress sensitivity for three involute tooth forms as a function of load position. The compliance analysis is based on Weber [2] and O’Donnell [3] but with an improved fillet/foundation compliance analysis. The stress sensitivity analysis is a modified version of the Heywood method [4] but with an improvement in the magnitude and location of the peak stress in the fillet. These improved compliance and stress sensitivity analyses are presented along with their evaluation using test, finite element, and analytic transformation results, which showed good agreement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document