General Robust Design by Semi-Second-Order Taylor Expansion

Author(s):  
Xiaoping Du

The purpose of robust design optimization is to minimize variations in design performances and therefore to make the design insensitive to uncertainties. Current robust design methods fall into two types — probabilistic robust design and worst-case (interval) robust design. The former method is used when random variables are involved. In this method, robustness is measure by standard deviations of design performances. The later method is used when uncertainties are represented by intervals. The widths of design performances are then used to measure robustness. In many engineering application, both random variables and interval variables may exist simultaneously. In this paper, a general approach to robust design optimization is proposed. The generality comes from the ability to handle both random and interval variables. To alleviate the computational burden, we employ a previously developed general robustness assessment method — semi-second-order Taylor expansion method, to evaluate the maximum and minimum standard deviations of a design performance. An efficient integration strategy of the general robustness assessment and optimization is proposed. With the integration strategy, the number of function calls can be reduced while good accuracy is maintained. A robust shaft design problem is given for demonstration.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Gouttière ◽  
Dirk Wunsch ◽  
Rémy Nigro ◽  
Virginie Barbieux ◽  
Charles Hirsch

Abstract A robust design optimization of a 1.5 stage axial compressor with secondary flows from Safran Aero Boosters is investigated. A total of 9 simultaneous operational and geometrical uncertainties are propagated for the nominal design point as well as for two off-design points, close to stall and choke conditions respectively. These uncertainties, including mass flow rates of the secondary flows, tip gap size of the rotor and highly correlated profiles on the inlet condition, are propagated by the Non-Intrusive Probabilistic Collocation method. In order to understand the effects of the uncertainties on the performances and to minimize the computational cost of the robust optimization, a preliminary uncertainty quantification (UQ) study of the original design is performed to identify and rule out less influential uncertainties. Contrary to what was expected, the imposed geometrical uncertainties on the tip gap are identified to have the relatively smallest influence on the performances by means of scaled sensitivity derivatives. The global objective of the robust design optimization is to minimize the standard deviations of the main compressor performances at all three operating points and to preserve the mean values of these performances. Because the objective functions are standard deviations, this study is only possible in a robust optimization setting, by propagating the simultaneous operational and geometrical uncertainties. A total of 9 stochastic objectives and 15 stochastic constraints are taken into account. The best optimal design preserves the mean performances of the compressor, while the standard deviations are minimized compared with the original design, ensuring a more robust operation. This effect is very pronounced in the off-design points.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Yuee Zhao ◽  
Hai Dong ◽  
Haibin Liang

This paper presents an effective approach for robust design optimization of car-door structures with spatially varied material properties. This spatially varied material property causes structural response quantities; for example, the natural frequency and the lateral stiffness coefficient become random variables. In this regard, the Karhunen-Loève expansion is first used to represent the elastic modulus and the mass density random fields as a series of random variables. Then, a stochastic finite-element model is formulated for uncertainty quantification of the car-door structure. Combined with a polynomial-based response surface model to mimic the true performance indicator, this allows one to efficiently evaluate probability constraints for the robust design optimization of the uncertain car-door structure. In numerical simulations, design variables of the uncertain car-door structure are defined as thickness values of the tailor rolled blank structure at various regions, whereas multiple design objectives are formulated via the structural weight, the first-order natural frequency, and the lateral stiffness coefficient. Results have shown that the mean value of performance indicators can be generally improved, whereas the response variance is further minimized to archive the robust design objective. The probability-based constraint is significant to relate the Pareto optimum set to the targeted structural safety level. The proposed approach is simple, suggesting an attractive tool for the robust design optimization of car-door structures with spatially varied material uncertainties.


Author(s):  
Souvik Chakraborty ◽  
Tanmoy Chatterjee ◽  
Rajib Chowdhury ◽  
Sondipon Adhikari

Optimization for crashworthiness is of vast importance in automobile industry. Recent advancement in computational prowess has enabled researchers and design engineers to address vehicle crashworthiness, resulting in reduction of cost and time for new product development. However, a deterministic optimum design often resides at the boundary of failure domain, leaving little or no room for modeling imperfections, parameter uncertainties, and/or human error. In this study, an operational model-based robust design optimization (RDO) scheme has been developed for designing crashworthiness of vehicle against side impact. Within this framework, differential evolution algorithm (DEA) has been coupled with polynomial correlated function expansion (PCFE). An adaptive framework for determining the optimum basis order in PCFE has also been presented. It is argued that the coupled DEA–PCFE is more efficient and accurate, as compared to conventional techniques. For RDO of vehicle against side impact, minimization of the weight and lower rib deflection of the vehicle are considered to be the primary design objectives. Case studies by providing various emphases on the two objectives have also been performed. For all the cases, DEA–PCFE is found to yield highly accurate results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document