Conceptual Thermal-Design Options for Pressure-Tube SCWRs With Thermochemical Co-Generation of Hydrogen

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Mokry ◽  
Maria Naidin ◽  
Farina Baig ◽  
Yevgeniy Gospodinov ◽  
Udo Zirn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Electrical Energy ◽  
Thermal Design ◽  
Pressure Tube ◽  
Fluid Temperature ◽  
Bulk Fluid ◽  
Development Costs ◽  
Steam Cycle

Currently there are a number of Generation IV SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR) concepts under development worldwide. The main objectives for developing and utilizing SCWRs are: 1) To increase gross thermal efficiency of current Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) from 33–35% to approximately 45–50%, and 2) To decrease the capital and operational costs and, in doing so, decrease electrical-energy costs (∼$1000 US/kW or even less). SCW NPPs will have much higher operating parameters compared to current NPPs (i.e., pressures of about 25 MPa and outlet temperatures up to 625°C). Additionally, SCWRs will have a simplified flow circuit in which steam generators, steam dryers, steam separators, etc. will be eliminated. Furthermore, SCWRs operating at higher temperatures can facilitate an economical co-generation of hydrogen through thermo-chemical cycles (particularly, the copper-chlorine cycle) or direct high-temperature electrolysis. To decrease significantly the development costs of a SCW NPP and to increase its reliability, it should be determined whether SCW NPPs can be designed with a steam-cycle arrangement that closely matches that of mature SuperCritical (SC) fossil power plants (including their SC turbine technology). The state-of-the-art SC steam cycles in fossil power plants are designed with a single-steam reheat and regenerative feedwater heating and reach thermal steam-cycle efficiencies up to 54% (i.e., net plant efficiencies of up to 43% on a Higher Heating Value Basis). It would be beneficial if SCWRs could involve a regenerative feedwater heating and nuclear steam reheat to be able to adapt the current SC turbine technology and to achieve similar high thermal efficiencies as the advanced fossil steam cycles. The nuclear steam reheat is easier to implement inside pressure-tube or pressure-channel reactors compared to pressure-vessel reactors. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) and Research and Development Institute of Power Engineering (RDIPE or NIKIET in Russian abbreviations) are currently developing concepts of the pressure-tube SCWRs. Therefore, no-reheat, single-reheat, and double-reheat cycles of future SCW NPPs were analyzed in terms of their thermal efficiencies. On this basis, several conceptual steam-cycle arrangements of pressure-tube SCWRs, their corresponding T-s diagrams and steam-cycle thermal efficiencies are presented in this paper together with major parameters of the copper-chlorine cycle for the co-generation of hydrogen. Also, bulk-fluid temperature and thermophysical properties profiles were calculated for a non-uniform cosine Axial Heat-Flux Distribution (AHFD) along a generic SCWR fuel channel, for reference purposes.

Thermal-Design Options for Pressure-Channel SCWRS With Cogeneration of Hydrogen

2008 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Naidin ◽  
Sarah Mokry ◽  
Farina Baig ◽  
Yevgeniy Gospodinov ◽  
Udo Zirn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Electrical Energy ◽  
Thermal Design ◽  
Fluid Temperature ◽  
Bulk Fluid ◽  
Development Costs ◽  
Pressure Channel ◽  
Steam Cycle

Currently there are a number of Generation IV supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactor (SCWR) concepts under development worldwide. The main objectives for developing and utilizing SCWRs are (1) to increase the gross thermal efficiency of current nuclear power plants (NPPs) from 33–35% to approximately 45–50% and (2) to decrease the capital and operational costs and, in doing so, decrease electrical-energy costs (approximately US$ 1000∕kW or even less). SCW NPPs will have much higher operating parameters compared to current NPPs (i.e., pressures of about 25MPa and outlet temperatures of up to 625°C). Additionally, SCWRs will have a simplified flow circuit in which steam generators, steam dryers, steam separators, etc. will be eliminated. Furthermore, SCWRs operating at higher temperatures can facilitate an economical cogeneration of hydrogen through thermochemical cycles (particularly, the copper-chlorine cycle) or direct high-temperature electrolysis. To decrease significantly the development costs of a SCW NPP and to increase its reliability, it should be determined whether SCW NPPs can be designed with a steam-cycle arrangement that closely matches that of mature supercritical (SC) fossil power plants (including their SC turbine technology). On this basis, several conceptual steam-cycle arrangements of pressure-channel SCWRs, their corresponding T‐s diagrams and steam-cycle thermal efficiencies are presented in this paper together with major parameters of the copper-chlorine cycle for the cogeneration of hydrogen. Also, bulk-fluid temperature and thermophysical properties profiles were calculated for a nonuniform cosine axial heat-flux distribution along a generic SCWR fuel channel, for reference purposes.

Thermodynamic Considerations for a Single-Reheat Cycle SCWR

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Naidin ◽  
R. Monichan ◽  
U. Zirn ◽  
K. Gabriel ◽  
I. Pioro
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Electrical Energy ◽  
Performance Simulation ◽  
Development Costs ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Steam Cycle

Currently, there are a number of Generation IV SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR) concepts under development worldwide. The main objectives for developing and utilizing SCWRs are: 1) Increase gross thermal efficiency of current Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) from 30 – 35% to approximately 45 – 50%, and 2) Decrease capital and operational costs and, in doing so, decrease electrical-energy costs. SCW NPPs will have much higher operating parameters compared to current NPPs (i.e., steam pressures of about 25 MPa and steam outlet temperatures up to 625°C). Additionally, SCWRs will have a simplified flow circuit in which steam generators, steam dryers, steam separators, etc. will be eliminated. Furthermore, SCWRs operating at higher temperatures can facilitate an economical co-generation of hydrogen through thermo-chemical cycles (particularly, the copper-chlorine cycle) or direct high-temperature electrolysis. To decrease significantly the development costs of a SCW NPP, to increase its reliability, and to achieve similar high thermal efficiencies as the advanced fossil steam cycles it should be determined whether SCW NPPs can be designed with a steam-cycle arrangement that closely matches that of mature SuperCritical (SC) fossil-fired thermal power plants (including their SC-turbine technology). The state-of-the-art SC-steam cycles at fossil-fired power plants are designed with a single-steam reheat and regenerative feedwater heating. Due to that, they reach thermal steam-cycle efficiencies up to 54% (i.e., net plant efficiencies of up to 43% on a Higher Heating Value (HHV) Basis). This paper analyzes main parameters and performance in terms of thermal efficiency of a SCW NPP concept based on a direct regenerative steam cycle. To increase the thermal efficiency and to match current SC-turbine parameters, the cycle also includes a single steam-reheat stage. The cycle is comprised of: an SCWR, a SC turbine, which consists of one High-Pressure (HP) cylinder, one Intermediate-Pressure (IP) cylinder and two Low-Pressure (LP) cylinders, one deaerator, ten feedwater heaters, and pumps. Since this option includes a “nuclear” steam-reheat stage, the SCWR is based on a pressure-tube design. A thermal-performance simulation reveals that the overall thermal efficiency is approximately 50%.

General Layouts of Supercritical-Water NPPs

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Pioro ◽  
M. Naidin ◽  
S. Mokry ◽  
Eu. Saltanov ◽  
W. Peiman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supercritical Water ◽  
Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Electrical Energy ◽  
Development Costs ◽  
Flow Circuit ◽  
Steam Cycle

Currently, there are a number of Generation IV SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR) concepts under development worldwide. The main objectives for developing and utilizing SCWRs are: 1) Increase gross thermal efficiency of current Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) from 30–35% to approximately 45–50%, and 2) Decrease capital and operational costs and, in doing so, decrease electrical-energy costs. SuperCritical Water (SCW) NPPs will have much higher operating parameters compared to current NPPs (i.e., steam pressures of about 25 MPa and steam outlet temperatures up to 625°C). Additionally, SCWRs will have a simplified flow circuit in which steam generators, steam dryers, steam separators, etc. will be eliminated. Furthermore, SCWRs operating at higher temperatures can facilitate an economical co-generation of hydrogen through thermo-chemical cycles (particularly, the copper-chlorine cycle) or direct high-temperature electrolysis. To decrease significantly the development costs of an SCW NPP, to increase its reliability, and to achieve similar high thermal efficiencies as the advanced fossil-fired steam cycles, it should be determined whether SCW NPPs can be designed with a steam-cycle arrangement that closely matches that of mature SuperCritical (SC) fossil-fired thermal power plants (including their SC-turbine technology). The state-of-the-art SC-steam cycles at fossil-fired power plants are designed with a single-steam reheat and regenerative feedwater heating. Due to this, they reach thermal steam-cycle efficiencies up to 54% (i.e., net plant efficiencies of up to 43–50% on a Higher Heating Value (HHV) basis). This paper presents several possible general layouts of SCW NPPs, which are based on a regenerative-steam cycle. To increase the thermal efficiency and to match current SC-turbine parameters, the cycle also includes a single steam-reheat stage. Since these options include a nuclear steam-reheat stage, the SCWR is based on a pressure-tube design.

Thermal Design Options Using Uranium Carbide and Uranium Dicarbide in SCWR Uniformly-Heated Fuel Channel

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leyland J. Allison ◽  
Lisa Grande ◽  
Sally Mikhael ◽  
Adrianexy Rodriguez Prado ◽  
Bryan Villamere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Thermal Design ◽  
Nuclear Fuels ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Bulk Fluid ◽  
Fuel Channel ◽  
Uranium Carbide

SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR) options are one of the six reactor options identified in Generation IV International Forum (GIF). In these reactors the light-water coolant is pressurized to supercritical pressures (up to approximately 25 MPa). This allows the coolant to remain as a single-phase fluid even under supercritical temperatures (up to approximately 625°C). SCW Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) are of such great interest, because their operating conditions allow for a significant increase in thermal efficiency when compared to that of modern conventional water-cooled NPPs. Direct-cycle SCW NPPs do not require the use of steam generators, steam dryers, etc. allowing for a simplified NPP design. This paper shows that new nuclear fuels such as Uranium Carbide (UC) and Uranium Dicarbide (UC2) are viable option for the SCWRs. It is believed they have great potential due to their higher thermal conductivity and corresponding to that lower fuel centerline temperature compared to those of conventional nuclear fuels such as uranium dioxide, thoria and MOX. Two conditions that must be met are: 1) keep the fuel centreline temperature below 1850°C (industry accepted limit), and 2) keep the sheath temperature below 850°C (design limit). These conditions ensure that SCWRs will operate efficiently and safely. It has been determined that Inconel-600 is a viable option for a sheath material. A generic SCWR fuel channel was considered with a 43-element bundle. Therefore, bulk-fluid, sheath and fuel centreline and HTC profiles were calculated along the heated length of a fuel channel.

Supercritical Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors (SCWRs): Current and Future Concepts — Steam Cycle Options

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Duffey ◽  
I. Pioro ◽  
X. Zhou ◽  
U. Zirn ◽  
S. Kuran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Supercritical Water ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Hydrogen Generation ◽  
Electrical Energy ◽  
Reactor Outlet ◽  
Cycle Efficiency ◽  
Direct Cycle

One of the six Generation IV nuclear reactor concepts is a SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR), which is currently under development. The main objectives for developing and utilizing SCWRs are to increase the thermal efficiency of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs), to decrease electrical energy costs, and possibility for co-generation, including hydrogen generation. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) and Research and Development Institute of Power Engineering (RDIPE or NIKIET in Russian abbreviations) are currently developing pressure-tube SCWR concepts. The targeted steam parameters at the reactor outlet are approximately 25 MPa and 625°C. This paper presents a survey on modern SuperCritical (SC) steam turbine technology and a study on potential steam cycles for the SCWR plants. The survey reveals that by the time the Gen IV SCWRs are market-ready, the required steam turbine technology will be well proven. Three potential steam cycles in an SCWR plant are presented: a dual-cycle with steam reheat, a direct cycle with steam reheat, and a direct cycle with a Moisture Separator and Reheater (MSR). System thermal-performance simulations have been performed to determine the overall cycle efficiency of the proposed cycles. The results show that the direct cycle with steam reheat has the highest efficiency. The direct cycle with MSR is an alternative option, which will simplify the reactor design at the penalty of a slightly lower cycle efficiency.

Power Cycles of Generation III and III+ Nuclear Power Plants

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Dragunov ◽  
Eugene Saltanov ◽  
Igor Pioro ◽  
Pavel Kirillov ◽  
Romney Duffey
Keyword(s):  
Renewable Energy ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Renewable Energy Sources ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Electrical Energy ◽  
Energy Sources ◽  
Thermal Power Plants

It is well known that the electrical-power generation is the key factor for advances in any other industries, agriculture and level of living. In general, electrical energy can be generated by: 1) non-renewable-energy sources such as coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear; and 2) renewable-energy sources such as hydro, wind, solar, biomass, geothermal and marine. However, the main sources for electrical-energy generation are: 1) thermal - primary coal and secondary natural gas; 2) “large” hydro and 3) nuclear. The rest of the energy sources might have visible impact just in some countries. Modern advanced thermal power plants have reached very high thermal efficiencies (55–62%). In spite of that they are still the largest emitters of carbon dioxide into atmosphere. Due to that, reliable non-fossil-fuel energy generation, such as nuclear power, becomes more and more attractive. However, current Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) are way behind by thermal efficiency (30–42%) compared to that of advanced thermal power plants. Therefore, it is important to consider various ways to enhance thermal efficiency of NPPs. The paper presents comparison of thermodynamic cycles and layouts of modern NPPs and discusses ways to improve their thermal efficiencies.

Nuclear Power Plant Fires and Explosions: Part IV — Water Hammer Explosion Mechanisms

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Leishear
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Water Hammer ◽  
Compression Process ◽  
Flammable Gas ◽  
Piping Systems ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi ◽  
Accident Conditions

Water hammers, or fluid transients, compress flammable gasses to their autognition temperatures in piping systems to cause fires or explosions. While this statement may be true for many industrial systems, the focus of this research are reactor coolant water systems (RCW) in nuclear power plants, which generate flammable gasses during normal operations and during accident conditions, such as loss of coolant accidents (LOCA’s) or reactor meltdowns. When combustion occurs, the gas will either burn (deflagrate) or explode, depending on the system geometry and the quantity of the flammable gas and oxygen. If there is sufficient oxygen inside the pipe during the compression process, an explosion can ignite immediately. If there is insufficient oxygen to initiate combustion inside the pipe, the flammable gas can only ignite if released to air, an oxygen rich environment. This presentation considers the fundamentals of gas compression and causes of ignition in nuclear reactor systems. In addition to these ignition mechanisms, specific applications are briefly considered. Those applications include a hydrogen fire following the Three Mile Island meltdown, hydrogen explosions following Fukushima Daiichi explosions, and on-going fires and explosions in U.S nuclear power plants. Novel conclusions are presented here as follows. 1. A hydrogen fire was ignited by water hammer at Three Mile Island. 2. Hydrogen explosions were ignited by water hammer at Fukushima Daiichi. 3. Piping damages in U.S. commercial nuclear reactor systems have occurred since reactors were first built. These damages were not caused by water hammer alone, but were caused by water hammer compression of flammable hydrogen and resultant deflagration or detonation inside of the piping.

The analysis of emergency situations related to fires at nuclear power plants

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 66-75
Author(s):  
S. A. Titov ◽  
N. M. Barbin ◽  
A. M. Kobelev
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Reactor Core ◽  
Emergency Situations ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Large Fires ◽  
Short Circuits ◽  
Nuclear Reactor Core

Introduction. The article provides a system and statistical analysis of emergency situations associated with fires at nuclear power plants (NPPs) in various countries of the world for the period from 1955 to 2019. The countries, where fires occurred at nuclear power plants, were identified (the USA, Great Britain, Switzerland, the USSR, Germany, Spain, Japan, Russia, India and France). Facilities, exposed to fires, are identified; causes of fires are indicated. The types of reactors where accidents and incidents, accompanied by large fires, have been determined.The analysis of major emergency situations at nuclear power plants accompanied by large fires. During the period from 1955 to 2019, 27 large fires were registered at nuclear power plants in 10 countries. The largest number of major fires was registered in 1984 (three fires), all of them occurred in the USSR. Most frequently, emergency situations occurred at transformers and cable channels — 40 %, nuclear reactor core — 15 %, reactor turbine — 11 %, reactor vessel — 7 %, steam pipeline systems, cooling towers — 7 %. The main causes of fires were technical malfunctions — 33 %, fires caused by the personnel — 30 %, fires due to short circuits — 18 %, due to natural disasters (natural conditions) — 15 % and unknown reasons — 4 %. A greater number of fires were registered at RBMK — 6, VVER — 5, BWR — 3, and PWR — 3 reactors.Conclusions. Having analyzed accidents, involving large fires at nuclear power plants during the period from 1955 to 2019, we come to the conclusion that the largest number of large fires was registered in the USSR. Nonetheless, to ensure safety at all stages of the life cycle of a nuclear power plant, it is necessary to apply such measures that would prevent the occurrence of severe fires and ensure the protection of personnel and the general public from the effects of a radiation accident.

scholarly journals Structural Modeling and Dynamic Analysis of a Nuclear Reactor Building

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evrim Oyguc ◽  
Abdul Hayır ◽  
Resat Oyguc
Keyword(s):  
Nonlinear Dynamic ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Energy Sources ◽  
Finite Element Program ◽  
Design Spectrum ◽  
Reactor Building ◽  
Set Up

Increasing energy demand urge the developing countries to consider different types of energy sources. Owing the fact that the energy production capacity of renewable energy sources is lower than a nuclear power plant, developed countries like US, France, Japan, Russia and China lead to construct nuclear power plants. These countries compensate 80% of their energy need from nuclear power plants. Further, they periodically conduct tests in order to assess the safety of the existing nuclear power plants by applying impact type loads to the structures. In this study, a sample third-generation nuclear reactor building has been selected to assess its seismic behavior and to observe the crack propagations of the prestressed outer containment. First, a 3D model has been set up using ABAQUS finite element program. Afterwards, modal analysis is conducted to determine the mode shapes. Nonlinear dynamic time history analyses are then followed using an artificial strong ground motion which is compatible with the mean design spectrum of the previously selected ground motions that are scaled to Eurocode 8 Soil type B design spectrum. Results of the conducted nonlinear dynamic analyses are considered in terms of stress distributions and crack propagations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document