Safety Assessment of Disposal Container for Higher Activity Low Level Waste

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motonori Nakagami ◽  
Seiji Komatsuki ◽  
Kyosuke Fujisawa ◽  
Takashi Nishio ◽  
Thomas Quercetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Fracture Strain ◽  
The Body ◽  
Unstable Fracture ◽  
Maximum Weight ◽  
Drop Tests

As one of the studies on “yoyushindo disposal” whose concept is similar to an intermediate disposal, the development of a disposal container has been conducted by the Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan. To assess a drop event of a waste package in which stored the radioactive wastes from nuclear power plants, the toughness of the disposal container was evaluated by drop tests using three specimens which have actual dimensions, drop analysis, fracture mechanics assessment and macroscopic tests. The three specimens for drop tests were manufactured in consideration of the design specifications and the manufacture operations in nuclear power plants. The lid plates of the specimens were welded to the body plates without pre- and post-weld heat treatment by using a remote automated welding machine. The drop tests showed that no penetration cracks or splash of its content occurred in the disposal container under conservative conditions such as the maximum weight and height in the handling. Drop analysis and the fracture mechanics assessment indicate that the strain induced by the drop impact did not exceed the fracture strain and an unstable fracture did not occur. And macroscopic tests showed that penetration cracks did not occur at 8m drop events. These tests and evaluations confirmed that the disposal container had sufficient toughness.

Review of the Configuration Risk Management Methodologies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhang Zhang ◽  
Zhijian Zhang ◽  
He Wang ◽  
Lixuan Zhang ◽  
Dabin Sun
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Probabilistic Safety Assessment ◽  
Technical Specifications ◽  
Risk Monitor ◽  
Probabilistic Safety

Abstract To ensure nuclear safety and prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents, many safety systems have been set up in nuclear power plants to limit the consequences of accidents. Even though technical specifications based on deterministic safety analysis are applied to avoid serious accidents, they are too poor to handle multi-device managements compared with configuration risk management which computes risks in nuclear power plants based on probabilistic safety assessment according to on-going configurations. In general, there are two methodologies employed in configuration risk management: living probabilistic safety assessment (LPSA) and risk monitor (RM). And average reliability databases during a time of interest are employed in living probabilistic safety assessment, which may be naturally applied to make long-term or regular management projects. While transient risk databases are involved in risk monitor to measure transient risks in nuclear power plants, which may be more appropriate to monitor the real-time risks in nuclear power plants and provide scientific real-time suggestions to operators compared with living probabilistic safety assessment. And this paper concentrates on the applications and developments of living probabilistic safety assessment and risk monitor which are the mainly foundation of the configuration risk management to manage nuclear power plants within safe threshold and avoid serious accidents.

Studies on Safety Assessment Method for Operating License Extension of Nuclear Power Plants in China

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhilin Chen ◽  
Ping Huang ◽  
Chunhui Wang ◽  
Zhiyuan Chi ◽  
Fangjie Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Nuclear Safety ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Effect Evaluation ◽  
Environment Effect ◽  
Assessment Environment

It’s the trend to extend the operating license time, called Operating License Extension (OLE) in China, of nuclear power plants (NPPs) in the future. It needs to be adequately demonstrated by licensees and approved by the regulator to gain an extended license time, such as 20 years. The demonstration methods for OLE are different among countries due to the different management systems for NPPs. Safety assessment, environment effect evaluation and update of the final safety analysis report (FSAR) will be the main aspects during OLE demonstration of NPPs in China according to the technical policy issued by National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA). Technical methods for scoping and screening, aging management review and time-limited aging analyses, which are the main contents of safety assessment are established based on the technical policy drafted by NNSA and international experiences in order to assist the operators to implement the safety assessment for OLE of NPP.

Application of Probabilistic Safety Assessment in the Design of Instrumentation and Control Systems for Nuclear Power Plants

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengyi Peng ◽  
Weidong Liu ◽  
Zhichao Yang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Optimal Design ◽  
System Design ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Probabilistic Safety Assessment ◽  
And Control ◽  
Probabilistic Safety

Instrumentation and control (I&C) systems in nuclear power plants (NPPs) have the ability to initiate the safety-related functions necessary to shut down the plants and maintain the plants in a safe shutdown condition. I&C systems of low reliability will bring risks to the safe operation of NPPs. A sufficient level of redundancy and diversity of I&C design to ensure the safety is a major focus when designing a new reactor. Usually multiple signal paths are included in an I&C system design. Meanwhile, besides the protection and safety monitoring system (PMS), other sub-systems of I&C such as the diverse actuation system (DAS) will be included as a diverse backup of PMS to perform the functions of reactor trip and engineered safety features actuation systems (ESFAS). However, the construction costs increase as the level of system redundancy and diversity grows. In fact, from the perspective of deterministic theory, an I&C system of only two chains can meet the single failure criterion. So how to obtain the balance of safety and economy is a challenging problem in I&C system designing. Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) is the most commonly used quantitative risk assessment tool for decision-making in selecting the optimal design among alternative options. In this paper, PSA technique was used to identify whether the I&C system design offers adequate redundancy, diversity, and independence with sufficient defense-in-depth and safety margins in the design of a new reactor. Firstly, detailed risk assessment criteria for I&C design were studied and identified in accordance with nuclear regulations. Secondly, different designs were appropriately modeled, and the risk insights were provided, showing the balance of safety and economy of each design. Furthermore, potential design improvements were evaluated in terms of the current risk assessment criterion. In the end, the optimal design was determined, and uncertainty analyses were performed. The results showed that all four designs analyzed in this paper were met the safety goals in terms of PSA, but each design had a different impact on the balance of risk. As the support systems of the NPP we analyzed were relatively weak, loss of off-site power and loss of service water were two main risk contributors. The common cause failure of reactor trip breakers and the sensors of containment pressure were risk-significant. After identifying the major risk factors, the I&C design team can perform subsequent optimizations in the further design based on the PSA results and achieve an optimal balance between safety and economy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document