Compressible and Incompressible Large Eddy Simulation of a Premixed Dump Combustor

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence Ma ◽  
Andreas M. Kempf
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Flame Surface ◽  
Acoustic Oscillations ◽  
Dump Combustor ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Characteristic Boundary ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Selection Of

Premixed combustion in the ORACLES dump combustor is investigated by Large-Eddy Simulation. The results are compared with experimental measurements of mean and fluctuating velocities at various points inside the combustor. The LES is performed with the in-house PsiPhi code, which has been modified to account for compressibility so that flame-acoustic interactions can be studied. The modifications include the use of proper boundary conditions that are based on the Navier-Stokes Characteristic Boundary Conditions (NSCBC) [1]. A fixed velocity and temperature inlet as well as a partially reflecting outlet are selected. The reaction rate is modelled using algebraic expressions for the generalised flame surface density (FSD) Σgen. A selection of FSD models [2] were previously tested using the incompressible version of PsiPhi and this work examines three additional models. Previous incompressible works [2, 3] on this setup emulated the effect of acoustic oscillations by introducing sinusoidal pulsations at the inlet with a frequency of 50Hz. We apply the same technique for the simulations and match the results with those from the modified compressible version, albeit for a compact domain which cannot be expected to capture the lowest acoustic frequencies. Apart from assessing performance, we also make comparisons of the simulation cost and stability to gain a better perspective of whether new FSD models and the compressible description are favorable.

Large eddy simulation of a pulsed jet in cross-flow

2012 ◽  
Vol 695 ◽  
pp. 1-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Coussement ◽  
O. Gicquel ◽  
G. Degrez
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Sine Wave ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Pulsed Jet ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Characteristic Boundary ◽  
Jet In Cross Flow ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Flow Configurations

AbstractThis study quantifies the mixing that results from a pulsed jet in cross-flow in the near jet region. By large eddy simulation computations, it also helps to understand the physical phenomena involved in the formation of the pulsed jet in cross-flow. The boundary conditions of the jet inlet are implemented via a Navier–Stokes characteristic boundary condition coupled with a Fourier series development. The signals used to pulse the jet inlet are a square or a sine wave. A new way of characterizing the mixing is introduced with the goal of easily interpreting and quantifying the complicated mixing process involved in a pulsed jet in cross-flow flow fields. Different flow configurations, pulsed and non-pulsed, are computed and compared, keeping the root mean square value of the signal constant. This comparison not only allows the characterization of the mixing but also illustrates some of the properties of the mixing characterization.

Hybrid Large Eddy Simulation/Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Analysis of a Premixed Ethylene-Fueled Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor

AIAA Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Tanner B. Nielsen ◽  
Jack R. Edwards ◽  
Harsha K. Chelliah ◽  
Damien Lieber ◽  
Clayton Geipel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Dual Mode ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Scramjet Combustor ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes

Simulation of Vortex Instability in a Pipe Trifurcation

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Ruprecht ◽  
Ralf Neubauer ◽  
Thomas Helmrich
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Model Test ◽  
Reasonable Agreement ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Extended Version ◽  
Vortex Instability ◽  
Flow Phenomenon ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

The vortex instability in a spherical pipe trifurcation is investigated by applying a Very Large Eddy Simulation (VLES). For this approach an new adaptive turbulence model based on an extended version of the k-ε model is used. Applying a classical Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes-Simulation with the standard k-ε model is not able to forecast the vortex instability. However the prescribed VLES method is capable to predict this flow phenomenon. The obtained results show a reasonable agreement with measurements in a model test.

Large Eddy Simulation of Cross Flow in Pipe Junction

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiajun Chen ◽  
Yue Sun ◽  
Hang Zhang ◽  
Dakui Feng ◽  
Zhiguo Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Exciting Force ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Pipe Network ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

Mixing in pipe junctions can play an important role in exciting force and distribution of flow in pipe network. This paper investigated the cross pipe junction and proposed an improved plan, Y-shaped pipe junction. The numerical study of a three-dimensional pipe junction was performed for calculation and improved understanding of flow feature in pipe. The filtered Navier–Stokes equations were used to perform the large-eddy simulation of the unsteady incompressible flow in pipe. From the analysis of these results, it clearly appears that the vortex strength and velocity non-uniformity of centerline, can be reduced by Y-shaped junction. The Y-shaped junction not only has better flow characteristic, but also reduces head loss and exciting force. The results of the three-dimensional improvement analysis of junction can be used in the design of pipe network for industry.

Large Eddy Simulation of the Flow Around a Diffuser-Equipped Bluff Body in Ground Effect

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Schembri Puglisevich ◽  
Gary Page
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Bluff Body ◽  
Vortex Formation ◽  
Ground Effect ◽  
Vortical Flow ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Flow Structures ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Flow Features

Unsteady Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is carried out for the flow around a bluff body equipped with an underbody rear diffuser in close proximity to the ground, representing an automotive diffuser. The goal is to demonstrate the ability of LES to model underbody vortical flow features at experimental Reynolds numbers (1.01 × 106 based on model height and incoming velocity). The scope of the time-dependent simulations is not to improve on Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS), but to give further insight into vortex formation and progression, allowing better understanding of the flow, hence allowing more control. Vortical flow structures in the diffuser region, along the sides and top surface of the bluff body are successfully modelled. Differences between instantaneous and time-averaged flow structures are presented and explained. Comparisons to pressure measurements from wind tunnel experiments on an identical bluff body model shows a good level of agreement.

A Method of Measuring Turbulent Flow Structures With Particle Image Velocimetry and Incorporating Into Boundary Conditions of Large Eddy Simulations

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Puxuan Li ◽  
Steve J. Eckels ◽  
Garrett W. Mann ◽  
Ning Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Particle Image Velocimetry ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Particle Image ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Piv Measurement ◽  
Image Velocimetry ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Inlet Conditions

The setup of inlet conditions for a large eddy simulation (LES) is a complex and important problem. Normally, there are two methods to generate the inlet conditions for LES, i.e., synthesized turbulence methods and precursor simulation methods. This study presents a new method for determining inlet boundary conditions of LES using particle image velocimetry (PIV). LES shows sensitivity to inlet boundary conditions in the developing region, and this effect can even extend into the fully developed region of the flow. Two kinds of boundary conditions generated from PIV data, i.e., steady spatial distributed inlet (SSDI) and unsteady spatial distributed inlet (USDI), are studied. PIV provides valuable field measurement, but special care is needed to estimate turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent dissipation rate for SSDI. Correlation coefficients are used to analyze the autocorrelation of the PIV data. Different boundary conditions have different influences on LES, and their advantages and disadvantages for turbulence prediction and static pressure prediction are discussed in the paper. Two kinds of LES with different subgrid turbulence models are evaluated: namely dynamic Smagorinsky–Lilly model (Lilly model) and wall modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES model). The performances of these models for flow prediction in a square duct are presented. Furthermore, the LES results are compared with PIV measurement results and Reynolds-stress model (RSM) results at a downstream location for validation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document