Experimental Validation of Unlumped Model and its Design Implications for Rotary Series Elastic Actuators

Author(s):  
Jeong H. Yoon ◽  
Daniel Sun ◽  
Vidur Sanandan ◽  
Dennis Hong

Series Elastic Actuators (SEA) have been in development for multiple decades. In spite of this, few design guidelines exist and stiffness selection for the compliant element still remains a trial-and-error process. In this paper, we experimentally validated the unlumped model first proposed by Orekhov for Rotary SEA (RSEA) and outlined a design methodology for selecting the spring stiffness based on the open loop force control bandwidth of unlumped model for series elastic actuators. We modified the unlumped model to apply to Rotary SEAs. Through experimental system identification, we demonstrated that our new unlumped model for RSEA is a valid model of actuator dynamics. Additionally, we recommended design guidelines for RSEA to achieve desired force control bandwidth based on the pure torque source assumption. An example of the design process was given and actuator performance was verified through dynamic simulations in ADAMS.

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 964-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Yup Lee ◽  
Byeong-Sang Kim ◽  
Jae-Bok Song ◽  
Soo-Won Chae

Actuators ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Calanca ◽  
Luca Capisani ◽  
Paolo Fiorini

Author(s):  
Viktor Orekhov ◽  
Derek Lahr ◽  
Bryce Lee ◽  
Dennis Hong

Variable compliance has been a growing topic of interest in legged robotics due to recent studies showing that animals adjust their leg and joint stiffness to adjust their natural dynamics and to accommodate changes in their environment. However, existing designs add significant weight, size, and complexity. Series Elastic Actuators, on the other hand, are designed with a set stiffness usually tuned for actuator performance. We propose a new concept for implementing a physical spring in series with a linear SEA using a cantilevered spring. A movable pivot is used to adjust the stiffness by changing the effective length of the cantilever. While the proposed design does not allow for variable compliance, it does retain many of the benefits of passive spring elements such as absorbing impacts, storing energy, and enabling force control. The primary advantage of the design is the ability to adjust the stiffness of each joint individually without the increased weight and complexity of variable stiffness designs. This paper introduces the motivation for configurable compliance, describes the proposed design concept, explains the design methods, and presents experimental data from a completed prototype.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 2255-2262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley Roozing ◽  
Jorn Malzahn ◽  
Navvab Kashiri ◽  
Darwin G. Caldwell ◽  
Nikos G. Tsagarakis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document