Analysis of the Hex Cell Discretization for Topology Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms

Author(s):  
Nilesh D. Mankame ◽  
Anupam Saxena

We use non-linear finite element simulations to study the convergence behavior of the honeycomb or hex cell design discretization for optimization-based synthesis of compliant mechanisms in this paper. Adjacent elements share exactly one common edge in the hex cell discretization, unlike the square cell discretization in which adjacent elements can be connected by a single node. As the single node connections in bilinear quadrilateral plane stress elements allow strain-free relative rotations, compliant mechanism designs obtained from square cell discretizations with these elements often contain elements with single node connections or point flexures. Point flexures are sites of lumped compliance, and as such, are undesirable as they lead to compliant mechanisms designs which deviate from the ideal of distributed compliance. The hex cell design discretization circumvents the problem of point flexures without any additional computational expense (e.g. filtering, extra constraints, etc.) by exploiting the geometry of the discretization. In this work we compare the elastic response of a group of four cells in which two adjacent cells have the least connectivity in both: the square and the hex discretizations. Simulations show that the hex cell discretization leads to a more accurate modeling of the displacement, stress and strain energy fields in the vicinity of the least connectivity regions than the square cell discretization. Therefore, the hex cell discretization does not suffer from stress singularities that plague the square cell discretization. These properties ensure that continuous optimization-based compliant mechanism synthesis procedures that use the hex cell discretization, exhibit a faster and more stable convergence to designs that can be readily manufactured than those that use the square cell discretization.

Author(s):  
A. Midha ◽  
I. Her ◽  
B. A. Salamon

Abstract A broader research proposal seeks to systematically combine large-deflection mechanics of flexible elements with important kinematic considerations, in yielding compliant mechanisms which perform useful tasks. Specifically, the proposed design methodology will address the following needs: development of the necessary nomenclature, classification and definitions, and identification of the kinematic properties; categorization of mechanism synthesis types, both structurally as well as by function; development of efficient computational techniques for design; consideration of materials; and application and validation. Contained herein, in particular, is an introduction to the state-of-the-art in compliant mechanisms, and the development of an accurate chain calculation algorithm for use in the analysis of a large-deflection, cantilevered elastica. Shooting methods, which permit specification of additional boundary conditions on the elastica, as well as compliant mechanism examples are presented in a companion paper.


2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Punit Bandi ◽  
James P. Schmiedeler ◽  
Andrés Tovar

This work presents a novel method for designing crashworthy structures with controlled energy absorption based on the use of compliant mechanisms. This method helps in introducing flexibility at desired locations within the structure, which in turn reduces the peak force at the expense of a reasonable increase in intrusion. For this purpose, the given design domain is divided into two subdomains: flexible (FSD) and stiff (SSD) subdomains. The design in the flexible subdomain is governed by the compliant mechanism synthesis approach for which output ports are defined at the interface between the two subdomains. These output ports aid in defining potential load paths and help the user make better use of a given design space. The design in the stiff subdomain is governed by the principle of a fully stressed design for which material is distributed to achieve uniform energy distribution within the design space. Together, FSD and SSD provide for a combination of flexibility and stiffness in the structure, which is desirable for most crash applications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 10831
Author(s):  
Jincheng Guo ◽  
Huaping Tang

This paper presents a stiffness-oriented structure topology optimization (TO) method for the design of a continuous, hinge-free compliant mechanism (CM). A synthesis formulation is developed to maximize the mechanism’s mutual potential energy (MPE) to achieve required structure flexibility while maximizing the desired stiffness to withstand the loads. Different from the general approach of maximizing the overall stiffness of the structure, the proposed approach can contribute to guiding the optimization process focus on the desired stiffness in a specified direction by weighting the related eigen-frequency of the corresponding eigenmode. The benefit from this is that we can make full use of the material in micro-level compliant mechanism designs. The single-node connected hinge issue which often happened in optimized design can be precluded by introducing the eigen-frequency constraint into this synthesis formulation. Several obtained hinge-free designs illustrate the validity and robustness of the presented method and offer an alternative method for hinge-free compliant mechanism designs.


Author(s):  
Ashok Midha ◽  
Yuvaraj Annamalai ◽  
Sharath K. Kolachalam

Compliant mechanisms are defined as mechanisms that gain some, or all of their mobility from the flexibility of their members. Suitable use of pseudo-rigid-body models for compliant segments, and relying on the state-of-the-art knowledge of rigid-body mechanism synthesis types, greatly simplifies the design of compliant mechanisms. Assuming a pseudo-rigid-body four-bar mechanism, with one to four torsional springs located at the revolute joints to represent mechanism compliance, a simple, heuristic approach is provided to develop various compliant mechanism types. The synthesis with compliance method is used for three, four and five precision positions, with consideration of one to four torsional springs, to systematically develop design tables for standard mechanism synthesis types. These tables appropriately reflect the mechanism compliance by specification of either energy or torque. Examples are presented to demonstrate the use of weakly or strongly coupled sets of kinematic and energy/torque equations, as well as different compliant mechanism types in obtaining solutions.


Author(s):  
Mary I. Frecker ◽  
Noboru Kikuchi ◽  
Sridhar Kota

Abstract Compliant mechanism synthesis is an automated design procedure which allows the designer to systematically generate the optimal structural form for a particular set of loading and motion requirements. The synthesis method presented here solves a particular class of design problems, where the compliant mechanism is required to be both flexible to meet motion requirements, and stiff to withstand external loads. A two-part problem formulation is proposed using mutual and strain energies, whereby the conflicting design objectives of required flexibility and stiffness are handled via multi-criteria optimization. The resulting compliant mechanism topologies satisfy both kinematic and structural requirements. The problem formulation is implemented using a truss ground structure and SLP algorithm. Several design examples are presented to illustrate this method.


Author(s):  
Ashok Midha ◽  
Sharath K. Kolachalam ◽  
Yuvaraj Annamalai

Compliant mechanisms, unlike rigid-body mechanisms, are devices that derive some or all of their mobility due to the deformation of their flexible members. The knowledge of existing rigid-body mechanism synthesis techniques is very useful in designing compliant mechanisms. In rigid-body mechanisms, a four-bar is treated as the basic mechanism that can transfer motion, force or energy. In this paper, a compliant single-strip continuum is introduced as the basic compliant mechanism that can transfer motion, force or energy. A classification of compliant mechanisms is presented herein. A methodology for compliant single-strip mechanism synthesis for energy, force or torque specifications is developed in this research as our second objective. The synthesis types, the governing equations, and the variables involved are enumerated.


Author(s):  
Punit Bandi ◽  
James P. Schmiedeler ◽  
Andrés Tovar

This work presents a novel method for designing crashworthy structures with controlled energy absorption based on the use of compliant mechanisms. This method helps in introducing flexibility at desired locations within the structure, which in turn reduces the peak force at the expense of a reasonable increase in intrusion. For this purpose, the given design domain is divided into two subdomains: flexible (FSD) and stiff (SSD) subdomains. The design in the flexible subdomain is governed by the compliant mechanism synthesis approach for which output ports are defined at the interface between the two subdomains. These output ports aid in defining potential load paths and help the user make better use of a given design space. The design in the stiff subdomain is governed by the principle of a fully-stressed design for which material is distributed to achieve uniform energy distribution within the design space. Together, FSD and SSD provide for a combination of flexibility and stiffness in the structure, which is desirable for most crash applications.


Author(s):  
Omer Anil Turkkan ◽  
Hai-Jun Su

This paper presents a computer program for kinetostatic synthesis for design automation of compliant mechanisms. Kinetostatic synthesis is solving the geometric (e.g. link lengths) and elastic parameters (e.g. spring constants) for a prescribed set of kinematic and static force specifications. Although many kinematic synthesis algorithms and methods for compliant mechanism synthesis are available, a unified software tool that integrates algorithms and methods is yet to be developed. In our previous work, we have developed a unified framework for kinematic and static analysis of rigid body and compliant mechanisms. In this work, we extend this framework to kinetostatic synthesis of compliant mechanisms. Optimization algorithms for kinetostatic synthesis problems are presented and examples from different kinetostatic synthesis modules such as the bistable and constant force compliant mechanisms are given to demonstrate the current capability.


Author(s):  
Hong Zhou ◽  
Azher Hussain Naser Mohammed

Compliant mechanisms (CMs) utilize elastic deformations for mechanism functions. Their merits primarily come from jointless structures. The structure of a fully CM is a piece of elastic material and is defined by its topology, shape and size. Topology is the overarching material layout of a CM while shape and size are on its structural details, but topology is entangled with shape and size in the synthesis process of a CM because its elastic deformation is from the joint effect of topology, shape and size. Degree of freedom (DOF) and number of links used in rigid mechanism synthesis are not effective to guide the synthesis of CMs since any point of a fully CM can deform and its whole structure forms a single piece. Without effective synthesis guidance, the structural complexity of a synthesized CM can be undesirably high. In this paper, degree of genus (DOG) is introduced for topology guidance of CM synthesis. DOG of a CM is the number of holes and is actively controlled during its synthesis process. With DOG guidance, a synthesized CM will not have overcomplicated topology. Variable width curves (VWCs) are introduced in this paper for shape and size description. Any connection in a CM is defined as a VWC and the entire CM is modeled as a network of VWCs. With VWC description, a synthesized CM will not have unsmooth connection. Under DOG and VWC strategies, CM synthesis is systematized as optimizing control parameters of networks of VWCs. The proposed CM synthesis using DOG and VWC strategies is demonstrated by synthesizing shape morphing compliant mechanisms.


Author(s):  
Ashok Midha ◽  
Tony W. Norton ◽  
Larry L. Howell

Abstract A compliant mechanism is one which gains all or part of its mobility from the relative flexibility of its members rather than from rigid-body joints only. Compliant mechanisms offer clear advantages, such as need for fewer parts, less wear, noise and backlash due to clearances, when compared to rigid-body mechanisms performing similar functions. This important field is expected to undergo significant growth as materials with superior properties are developed. In the development of compliant mechanisms, the establishment of nomenclature and classification is of primary importance. This paper discusses common representations, i.e. names and diagrams, for a compliant mechanism. Names and diagrams will be shown to be similar because they represent “abstractions” of the same mechanism. The concept of “levels of abstraction” is introduced, and common levels of abstraction are identified. The relevance of this concept to the naming of mechanisms is shown by applying it to both rigid-body and compliant mechanism examples. Nomenclature is proposed for several of the common levels of abstraction, and issues involved in naming mechanisms are discussed. Finally, a discussion of synthesis types is presented, as are the advantages, disadvantages, and issues involved in the synthesis of a compliant mechanism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document