Validation of Distributed Risk Framework

Author(s):  
Peter Leung ◽  
Kosuke Ishii ◽  
Jan Benson ◽  
Jeffrey Abell

Global companies realize the importance of collaborative design, or workshare, to develop products not only to target to a single market, but to sell them to the entire world. Workshare not only incorporates diverse customer values into the product development, but also introduces challenges in managing work distributions among global teams. As a result, the authors have developed a Distributed Risk Framework to quantify risk based on rework to facilitate workshare planning [5] [6]. The risk framework has been applied to several industry projects and it received positive feedback from the potential users of these pilot applications. To verify the risk results analytically, this paper seeks for statistical evidence to confirm the key assumption that motivates the development and the usage of the framework, with the assumption being that more distributed work results in a greater risk of rework. This paper begins with an overview of the risk framework followed by the steps of using actual rework data from the International Vehicle Company (IVC) to confirm the framework assumption. As a summary, this paper presents the contributions of the risk framework and the barriers to extend it to other distributed product development projects.

Author(s):  
Peter Leung ◽  
Kosuke Ishii ◽  
Jan Benson ◽  
Jeffrey Abell

In today’s global economy, companies develop products not only to target a single market, but to sell them to the entire world. Companies that realize the importance of collaborative design develop regional engineering centers worldwide to balance design variations while ensuring local market success. This paradigm enables diverse customer values to be integrated into products, but also introduces challenges in the management of work distribution. Typically, workshare decisions consider the capability and capacity of the regional centers. This strategy, however, overlooks the interdependence of the design systems, leading to delays and quality problems. This paper describes a method to formulate the workshare risk based on the couplings of the design system components and to evaluate overall workshare scenario. The method involves two relationships, Component-to-Component Coupling and Workshare Coupling, and a technique to combine these two relationships to measure the workshare risk. A simple case of hair dryer illustrates the concepts, while the method is serving actual global automotive development projects.


2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 530-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Hoegl ◽  
Stephan M. Wagner

Previous research on supplier involvement in product development projects has produced contradictory results, with some studies showing a positive relationship, others no relationship, and still others a negative relationship between supplier involvement and project performance. Drawing on data from 124 managers, project leaders, buyer members, and supplier members pertaining to 28 product development projects, the authors find that buyer-supplier collaboration positively relates to product quality, adherence to product cost targets, adherence to development budgets, and adherence to development schedules. Furthermore, their analyses show that communication frequency and intensity has a curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship with project development budget and product cost.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document