Diagnosing Engineering Information Interoperability: Recognizing the Value of Standards-Based PLM — Part 1

Author(s):  
Manas Bajaj ◽  
Injoong Kim ◽  
Gregory Mocko ◽  
Russell Peak ◽  
Nsikan Udoyen ◽  
...  

The notion of an open standards-based product lifecycle management (PLM) framework is gaining momentum. In this paper, we describe the idea of a standards-based collective product model (CPM) and its interaction with domain models native to typical engineering tools. A critical hurdle in the development of the CPM from domain models is assessing the compatibility of information in these native models to its corresponding standards-based representation. To address this, we use the concept of “degree-of-openness” of engineering information. This concept comprises three metrics, namely compatibility, coverage and completeness that are used to evaluate the interoperability of information in tool-specific models with its corresponding standards-based representation. We also demonstrate GT-Diagnostics, a prototype tool that evaluates these metrics. Using electrical and mechanical CAD examples, we illustrate the value of these metrics in understanding the relative interoperability of information for engineering and business decision making. Results indicate that the metrics help to identify the sources of incompatibility of information and the areas of possible improvement in the compared schemas.

Author(s):  
Injoong Kim ◽  
Manas Bajaj ◽  
Nsikan Udoyen ◽  
Greg Mocko ◽  
Russell Peak ◽  
...  

Over a product lifecycle, many engineering tools are used to create computer-based models that need to interact. This poses interoperability problems because of the conflicting formats of the models and differing scopes of the tools. One proposed solution is an open standards-based product lifecycle management (PLM) framework. However, the use of open standards is hindered by the lack of knowledge regarding their actual and potential usage in current engineering processes. To overcome this hurdle and evaluate the opportunities and extent to which open standards can be used in such PLM frameworks, we develop three metrics for degree-of-openness of engineering information: compatibility, coverage, and completeness. To demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed metrics, we assess circuit board design information that is transferred between native models of an electronic CAD system and the STEP AP210 standard (ISO 10303-210). This preliminary experience shows that each of the three useful metrics provides a limited aspect of degree-of-openness, and the combination of these metrics provides a single more holistic degree-of-openness indicator.


Author(s):  
Injoong Kim ◽  
Manas Bajaj ◽  
Greg Mocko ◽  
Russell S. Peak

To evaluate the opportunities and extent to which open standards can be used in or enhanced for product lifecycle management frameworks, we have developed three metrics, namely, compatibility, completeness, and coverage, for assessing the degree-of-openness of engineering information. A simple test case shows that each of the three metrics provides a certain type of assessment of the degree-of-openness.


Author(s):  
Steven J. Fenves ◽  
Sebti Foufou ◽  
Conrad Bock ◽  
Ram D. Sriram

The initial core product model (CPM), developed at NIST for the support of in-house research projects, has been extended to create CPM2, intended to support a broad range of information relevant to product lifecycle management. CPM2 is a generic, abstract model with generic semantics. CPM2 gives equal status to three aspects of a product or artifact: its function, its form, and its behavior. Thus, CPM2 can support functional reasoning about a product in the conceptual stages of design, the recording and the modeling of its behavior in the postdesign stages as well as the “traditional” design phases. Three levels of CPM2 models, de-noted as the conceptual, intermediate, and implementation models, are described. Extensions of the initial CPM are briefly pre-sented. The facilities in CPM2 for building experimental intermediate systems are demonstrated and a short illustrative example is given. The full practical evaluation of CPM2 will require the development and use of implementation models.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumit Malabagi ◽  
Vinayak N. Kulkarni ◽  
V. N. Gaitonde ◽  
G. Jangali Satish ◽  
B. B. Kotturshettar

CIRP Annals ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ueda ◽  
N. Nishino ◽  
H. Nakayama ◽  
S.H. Oda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document