Effect of Fuel Gas Cleanup Option on Air-Blown IGCC Power Plant Performance

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. C. Yang ◽  
R. A. Newby ◽  
R. L. Bannister
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Heat Rate ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Fuel Gas ◽  
Gas Cleaning ◽  
Plant Sensitivity ◽  
Parametric Studies

Air-blown coal gasification for combined-cycle power generation is a technology soon to be demonstrated. A process evaluation of air-blown IGCC performed to estimate the plant heat rate, electrical output and potential emissions are described in this paper. A process model of an air-blown IGCC power system based on the Westinghouse 501F combustion turbine was developed to conduct the performance evaluation. Parametric studies were performed to develop an understanding of the power plant sensitivity to the major operating parameters and process options. Advanced hot fuel gas cleaning and conventional cold fuel gas cleaning options were both considered.

Advanced Coal Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant

1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Pavel ◽  
M. B. Blinn ◽  
G. B. Haldipur
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Heat Rate ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Advanced Technology ◽  
Operating Costs ◽  
Fuel Gas ◽  
Combined Cycle Power Plant ◽  
Particulate Removal ◽  
Net Power Output

This paper describes the conceptual design of an advanced technology coal gasification combined cycle power plant which has significant advantages over other power generation technologies. The plant is expected to provide lower capital and operating costs and superior environmental acceptability than other modes of generation. The design is based on the KRW Energy Systems Inc.’s pressurized fluidized bed coal gasification system. Hot cleaning of the fuel gas is accomplished using concepts being developed at the Waltz Mill pilot plant. Desulfurization of the fuel gas is by injection of dolomite into the gasifier bed. Final particulate removal is accomplished by an external filter. Net power output from the plant is 73 MW and the overall plant heat rate is 8760 Btu/KWh (HHV).

A GCC Power Plant With Methanol Storage for Intermediate-Load Duty

1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Paffenbarger
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Electricity Production ◽  
Fuel Prices ◽  
Electrical Demand ◽  
Integrated Facility ◽  
Plant Configuration

This paper describes the design and performance of a coal gasification combined-cycle power plant with an integrated facility for producing and storing methanol (GCC/methanol power plant). The methanol is produced at a steady rate and is burned in the combined cycle to generate additional power during periods of peak electrical demand. The GCC/methanol plant provides electricity generation and energy storage in one coal-based facility. It is of potential interest to electric utilities seeking to meet intermediate-load electrical demand on their systems. The plant configuration is determined by means of an innovative economic screening methodology considering capital and fuel costs over a range of cycling duties (capacity factors). Estimated levelized electricity production costs indicate that a GCC/methanol plant could be of economic interest as premium fuel prices increase relative to coal. The plant could potentially be of interest for meeting daily peak demands for periods of eight hours or less. The conceptual plant configuration employs a Texaco gasifier and a Lurgi methanol synthesis plant. Plant performance is estimated at peak and baseload output levels. No unusual design or operational problems were identified.

A GCC Power Plant With Methanol Storage for Intermediate-Load Duty

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Paffenbarger
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Electricity Production ◽  
Fuel Prices ◽  
Electrical Demand ◽  
Integrated Facility ◽  
Plant Configuration

This paper describes the design and performance of a coal gasification combined-cycle power plant with an integrated facility for producing and storing methanol (GCC/methanol power plant). The methanol is produced at a steady rate and is burned in the combined-cycle to generate additional power during periods of peak electrical demand. The GCC/methanol plant provides electricity generation and energy storage in one coal-based facility. It is of potential interest to electric utilities seeking to meet intermediate-load electrical demand on their systems. The plant configuration is determined by means of an economic screening study considering capital and fuel costs over a range of cycling duties (load factors). Estimated levelized electricity production costs indicate that a GCC/methanol plant could be of economic interest as premium fuel prices increase relative to coal. The plant could potentially be of interest for meeting daily peak demands for periods of eight hours or less. The conceptual plant configuration employs a Texaco gasifier and a Lurgi methanol synthesis plant. Plant performance is estimated at peak and baseload output levels. No unusual design or operational problems were identified.

Overall Performance of Advanced H2/Air Cycle Power Plants Based on Coal Decarbonisation

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gambini ◽  
M. Vellini
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Hydrogen Production ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Fuel Gas ◽  
Production Section ◽  
Pinch Technology ◽  
Energy Economy ◽  
Overall Performance

In this paper the overall performance of a new advanced mixed cycle (AMC), fed by hydrogen-rich fuel gas, has been evaluated. Obviously, hydrogen must be produced and here we have chosen the coal gasification for its production, quantifying all the thermal and electric requirements. At first, a simple combination between hydrogen production section and power section is performed. In fact, the heat loads of the first section can be satisfied by using the various raw syngas cooling, without using some material streams taken from the power section, but also without using part of heat, available in the production section and rejected into the environment, in the power section. The final result is very poor: over 34%. Then, by using the Pinch Technology, a more efficient, even if more complex, solution can be conceived: in this case the overall efficiency is very interesting: 39%. These results are very similar to those of a combined cycle power plant, equipped with the same systems and analyzed under the same hypotheses. The final result is very important because the “clean” use of coal in new power plant types must be properly investigated: in fact coal is the most abundant and the cheapest fossil fuel available on earth; moreover, hydrogen production, by using coal, is an interesting outlook because hydrogen has the potential to become the main energy carrier in a future sustainable energy economy.

Advanced Bottoming Cycle Optimisation for Large Alstom CCPP

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Vollmer ◽  
Camille Pedretti ◽  
Alexander Ni ◽  
Manfred Wirsum
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Economic Plant ◽  
Plant Design ◽  
Investment Cost ◽  
Definition Of

This paper presents the fundamentals of an evolutionary, thermo-economic plant design methodology, which enables an improved and customer-focused optimization of the bottoming cycle of a large Combined Cycle Power Plant. The new methodology focuses on the conceptual design of the CCPP applicable to the product development and the pre-acquisition phase. After the definition of the overall plant configuration such as the number of gas turbines used, the type of main cooling system and the related fix investment cost, the CCPP is optimized towards any criteria available in the process model (e.g. lowest COE, maximum NPV/IRR, highest net efficiency). In view of the fact that the optimization is performed on a global plant level with a simultaneous hot- and cold- end optimization, the results clearly show the dependency of the HRSG steam parameters and the related steam turbine configuration on the definition of the cold end (Air Cooled Condenser instead of Direct Cooling). Furthermore, competing methods for feedwater preheating (HRSG recirculation, condensate preheating or pegging steam), different HRSG heat exchanger arrangements as well as applicable portfolio components are automatically evaluated and finally selected. The developed process model is based on a fixed superstructure and copes with the full complexity of today’s bottoming cycle configurations as well with any constraints and design rules existing in practice. It includes a variety of component modules that are prescribed with their performance characteristics, design limitations and individual cost. More than 100 parameters are used to directly calculate the overall plant performance and related investment cost. Further definitions on payment schedule, construction time, operation regime and consumable cost results in a full economic life cycle calculation of the CCPP. For the overall optimization the process model is coupled to an evolutionary optimizer, whereas around 60 design parameters are used within predefined bounds. Within a single optimization run more than 100’000 bottoming cycle configurations are calculated in order to find the targeted optimum and thanks to today’s massive parallel computing resources, the solution can be found over night. Due to the direct formulation of the process model, the best cycle configuration is a result provided by the optimizer and can be based on a single-, dual or triple pressure system using non-reheat, reheat or double reheat configuration. This methodology enables to analyze also existing limitations and characteristics of the key components in the process model and assists to initiate new developments in order to constantly increase the value for power plant customers.

scholarly journals An Overview of Recent Clean Coal Gasification Technology R&D Activities Supported by the European Commission

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Minchener
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
European Commission ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Renewable Energy Sources ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Solid Particles ◽  
Biomass Waste ◽  
Fuel Gas ◽  
Gas Cleaning

Gasification combined cycle has the potential to provide a clean, high efficiency, low environmental impact power generation system. A prime fuel for such systems is coal but there is scope in part to utilise renewable energy sources including biomass and waste materials such as sewage sludge or even oil residues. There is considerable scope to improve the performance of the first generation systems of gasification combined cycle plant, both through design changes and through the continued development towards second generation plant. Such improvements offer the prospect of even better efficiency, coal/biomass/waste utilisation flexibility, lower emissions especially of CO2, and lower economic cost of power generation. There have been several major R&D initiatives, supported in part by the European Commission, which have been designed to meet these aims. The approach adopted has been to form multi-partner project teams comprising industry, industrial research organisations and selected universities. The main technical issues that have been considered include co-gasification, e.g. co-feeding, fuel conversion, gas quality, contaminants, component developments, and the integration of hot fuel gas cleaning systems for removal of solid particles, control of sulphur emissions, control of fuel bound nitrogenous species, removal of halides and control of alkali species. The technical R&D activities have been underpinned by several major techno-economic assessment studies. This paper provides an overview of these various activities which either form part of the European Commission JOULE Coal R&D Programme or were supported under an APAS special initiative.

Survey of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant Performance Estimates

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Pollutant Emissions ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Technical Literature ◽  
Combined Cycle Power Plant ◽  
Integrated Gasification

The idea of a combined cycle power plant integrated with a coal gasification process has attracted broad interest in recent years. This interest is based on unique attributes of this concept which include potentially low pollutant emissions, low heat rate and competitive economics as compared to conventional steam plants with stack gas scrubbing. Results from a survey of technical literature containing performance and economic predictions have been compiled for comparison and evaluation of this new technique. These performance and economic results indicate good promise for near-term commercialization of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant using current gas turbine firing temperatures. Also, these data show that advancements in turbine firing temperature are expected to provide sufficiently favorable economics for the concept to penetrate the market now held by conventional steam power plants.

Assessment of Gas Turbine and Combined Cycle Power Plant Performance Degradation

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Hepperle ◽  
Dirk Therkorn ◽  
Ernst Schneider ◽  
Stephan Staudacher
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Heat Rate ◽  
Performance Degradation ◽  
Empirical Method ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Performance Data ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Water Steam

Recoverable and non-recoverable performance degradation has a significant impact on power plant revenues. A more in depth understanding and quantification of recoverable degradation enables operators to optimize plant operation. OEM degradation curves represent usually non-recoverable degradation, but actual power output and heat rate is affected by both, recoverable and non-recoverable degradation. This paper presents an empirical method to correct longterm performance data of gas turbine and combined cycle power plants for recoverable degradation. Performance degradation can be assessed with standard plant instrumentation data, which has to be systematically stored, reduced, corrected and analyzed. Recoverable degradation includes mainly compressor and air inlet filter fouling, but also instrumentation degradation such as condensate in pressure sensing lines, condenser or bypass valve leakages. The presented correction method includes corrections of these effects for gas turbine and water steam cycle components. Applying the corrections on longterm operating data enables staff to assess the non-recoverable performance degradation any time. It can also be used to predict recovery potential of maintenance activities like compressor washings, instrumentation calibration or leakage repair. The presented correction methods are validated with long-term performance data of several power plants. It is shown that the degradation rate is site-specific and influenced by boundary conditions, which have to be considered for degradation assessments.

Application of On-Line Optimization Technology to Plant Operation

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney R. Gay
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Heat Rate ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Plant Operation ◽  
Budget Analysis ◽  
On Line

Traditionally optimization has been thought of as a technology to set power plant controllable parameters (i.e. gas turbine power levels, duct burner fuel flows, auxiliary boiler fuel flows or bypass/letdown flows) so as to maximize plant operations. However, there are additional applications of optimizer technology that may be even more beneficial than simply finding the best control settings for current operation. Most smaller, simpler power plants (such as a single gas turbine in combined cycle operation) perceive little need for on-line optimization, but in fact could benefit significantly from the application of optimizer technology. An optimizer must contain a mathematical model of the power plant performance and of the economic revenue and cost streams associated with the plant. This model can be exercised in the “what-if” mode to supply valuable on-line information to the plant operators. The following quantities can be calculated: Target Heat Rate Correction of Current Plant Operation to Guarantee Conditions Current Power Generation Capacity (Availability) Average Cost of a Megawatt Produced Cost of Last Megawatt Cost of Process Steam Produced Cost of Last Pound of Process Steam Heat Rate Increment Due to Load Change Prediction of Future Power Generation Capability (24 Hour Prediction) Prediction of Future Fuel Consumption (24 Hour Prediction) Impact of Equipment Operational Constraints Impact of Maintenance Actions Plant Budget Analysis Comparison of Various Operational Strategies Over Time Evaluation of Plant Upgrades The paper describes examples of optimizer applications other than the on-line computation of control setting that have provided benefit to plant operators. Actual plant data will be used to illustrate the examples.

Westinghouse Combustion Turbine Performance in Coal Gasification Combined Cycles

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Newby ◽  
Ronald L. Bannister ◽  
Frank Miao
Keyword(s):  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Process Variations ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Fuel Gas ◽  
Gas Cleaning ◽  
Turbine Performance ◽  
Combined Cycles ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Syngas Cleaning ◽  
Plant Efficiency

Combustion turbines, designed for conventional turbine fuels, are adaptable to low- and medium-Btu coal syngases if appropriate fuel gas cleaning is provided. Evaluations have been conducted on the performance of integrated gasification combined cycles (IGCC) using Westinghouse 501F and 501G combustion turbines, and the next-generation Westinghouse combustion turbine system, the ATS. Several major IGCC process variations have been considered. The estimated cycle efficiencies are competitive with alternative coal-fueled power generation technologies when using conventional cold syngas cleaning. Optimized coal gasification combined cycle air and steam integration is key to achieving competitive plant efficiency and economics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document