Augmented Single Loop Single Vector Algorithm Using Nonlinear Approximations of Constraints in Reliability-Based Design Optimization

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter N. Lind ◽  
Mårten Olsson

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) aims at minimizing a function of probabilistic design variables, given a maximum allowed probability of failure. The most efficient methods available for solving moderately nonlinear problems are single loop single vector (SLSV) algorithms that use a first-order approximation of the probability of failure in order to rewrite the inherently nested structure of the loop into a more efficient single loop algorithm. The research presented in this paper takes off from the fundamental idea of this algorithm. An augmented SLSV algorithm is proposed that increases the rate of convergence by making nonlinear approximations of the constraints. The nonlinear approximations are constructed in the following way: first, the SLSV experiments are performed. The gradient of the performance function is known, as well as an estimate of the most probable failure point (MPP). Then, one extra experiment, a probe point, per performance function is conducted at the first estimate of the MPP. The gradient of each performance function is not updated but the probe point facilitates the use of a natural cubic spline as an approximation of an augmented MPP estimate. The SLSV algorithm using probing (SLSVP) also incorporates a simple and effective move limit (ML) strategy that also minimizes the heuristics needed for initiating the optimization algorithm. The size of the forward finite difference design of experiment (DOE) is scaled proportionally with the change of the ML and so is the relative position of the MPP estimate at the current iteration. Benchmark comparisons against results taken from the literature show that the SLSVP algorithm is more efficient than other established RBDO algorithms and converge in situations where the SLSV algorithm fails.

Author(s):  
Rami Mansour ◽  
Mårten Olsson

In reliability-based design optimization (RBDO), an optimal design which minimizes an objective function while satisfying a number of probabilistic constraints is found. As opposed to deterministic optimization, statistical uncertainties in design variables and design parameters have to be taken into account in the design process in order to achieve a reliable design. In the most widely used RBDO approaches, the First-Order Reliability Method (FORM) is used in the probability assessment. This involves locating the Most Probable Point (MPP) of failure, or the inverse MPP, either exactly or approximately. If exact methods are used, an optimization problem has to be solved, typically resulting in computationally expensive double loop or decoupled loop RBDO methods. On the other hand, locating the MPP approximately typically results in highly efficient single loop RBDO methods since the optimization problem is not necessary in the probability assessment. However, since all these methods are based on FORM, which in turn is based on a linearization of the deterministic constraints at the MPP, they may suffer inaccuracies associated with neglecting the nonlinearity of deterministic constraints. In a previous paper presented by the authors, the Response Surface Single Loop (RSSL) Reliability-based design optimization method was proposed. The RSSL-method takes into account the non-linearity of the deterministic constraints in the computation of the probability of failure and was therefore shown to have higher accuracy than existing RBDO methods. The RSSL-method was also shown to have high efficiency since it bypasses the concept of an MPP. In RSSL, the deterministic solution is first found by neglecting uncertainties in design variables and parameters. Thereafter quadratic response surface models are fitted to the deterministic constraints around the deterministic solution using a single set of design of experiments. The RBDO problem is thereafter solved in a single loop using a closed-form second order reliability method (SORM) which takes into account all elements of the Hessian of the quadratic constraints. In this paper, the RSSL method is used to solve the more challenging system RBDO problems where all constraints are replaced by one constraint on the system probability of failure. The probabilities of failure for the constraints are assumed independent of each other. In general, system reliability problems may be more challenging to solve since replacing all constraints by one constraint may strongly increase the non-linearity in the optimization problem. The extensively studied reliability-based design for vehicle crash-worthiness, where the provided deterministic constraints are general quadratic models describing the system in the whole region of interest, is used to demonstrate the capabilities of the RSSL method for problems with system reliability constraints.


2004 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 851-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anukal Chiralaksanakul ◽  
Sankaran Mahadevan

Efficiency of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) methods is a critical criterion as to whether they are viable for real-world problems. Early RBDO methods are thus based primarily on the first-order reliability method (FORM) due to its efficiency. Recently, several first-order RBDO methods have been proposed, and their efficiency is significantly improved through problem reformulation and/or the use of inverse FORM. Our goal is to present these RBDO methods from a mathematical optimization perspective by formalizing FORM, inverse FORM, and associated RBDO reformulations. Through the formalization, their relationships are revealed. Using reported numerical studies, we discuss their numerical efficiency, convergence, and accuracy.


2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeng D. Youn ◽  
Kyung K. Choi ◽  
Young H. Park

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) involves evaluation of probabilistic constraints, which can be done in two different ways, the reliability index approach (RIA) and the performance measure approach (PMA). It has been reported in the literature that RIA yields instability for some problems but PMA is robust and efficient in identifying a probabilistic failure mode in the optimization process. However, several examples of numerical tests of PMA have also shown instability and inefficiency in the RBDO process if the advanced mean value (AMV) method, which is a numerical tool for probabilistic constraint evaluation in PMA, is used, since it behaves poorly for a concave performance function, even though it is effective for a convex performance function. To overcome difficulties of the AMV method, the conjugate mean value (CMV) method is proposed in this paper for the concave performance function in PMA. However, since the CMV method exhibits the slow rate of convergence for the convex function, it is selectively used for concave-type constraints. That is, once the type of the performance function is identified, either the AMV method or the CMV method can be adaptively used for PMA during the RBDO iteration to evaluate probabilistic constraints effectively. This is referred to as the hybrid mean value (HMV) method. The enhanced PMA with the HMV method is compared to RIA for effective evaluation of probabilistic constraints in the RBDO process. It is shown that PMA with a spherical equality constraint is easier to solve than RIA with a complicated equality constraint in estimating the probabilistic constraint in the RBDO process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document