Experimental and Simulated Studies of Oil/Water Fully Dispersed Flow in a Horizontal Pipe

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. Santos ◽  
P. M. Faia ◽  
F. A. P. Garcia ◽  
M. G. Rasteiro
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Drag Coefficient ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Liquid Paraffin ◽  
Water Mixture ◽  
Horizontal Pipe ◽  
Dispersed Flow ◽  
Oil Water ◽  
Mixture Viscosity

The flow of oil/water mixtures in a pipe can occur under different flow patterns. Additionally, being able to predict adequately pressure drop in such systems is of relevant importance to adequately design the conveying system. In this work, an experimental and numerical study of the fully dispersed flow regime of an oil/water mixture (liquid paraffin and water) in a horizontal pipe, with concentrations of the oil of 0.01, 0.13, and 0.22 v/v were developed. Experimentally, the values of pressure drop, flow photographs, and radial volumetric concentrations of the oil in the vertical diameter of the pipe cross section were collected. In addition, normalized conductivity values were obtained, in this case, for a cross section of the pipe where an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) ring was installed. Numerical studies were carried out in the comsolmultiphysics platform, using the Euler–Euler approach, coupled with the k–ε turbulence model. In the simulations, two equations for the calculation of the drag coefficient, Schiller–Neumann and Haider–Levenspiel, and three equations for mixture viscosity, Guth and Simba (1936), Brinkman (1952), and Pal (2000), were studied. The simulated data were validated with the experimental results of the pressure drop, good results having been obtained. The best fit occurred for the simulations that used the Schiller–Neumann equation for the calculation of the drag coefficient and the Pal (2000) equation for the mixture viscosity.

Pressure Drop for Oil-Water Two-phase Flow in Horizontal Pipe

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Liu ◽  
L. J. Guo ◽  
Liejin Guo ◽  
D. D. Joseph ◽  
Y. Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Horizontal Pipe ◽  
Oil Water

Uncertainty Analysis for the Measurement of Oil-Water Flow Parameters, Part II: Pressure Drop

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
A. Abubakar
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Water Flow ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Tap Water ◽  
Standard Uncertainty ◽  
Water Volume ◽  
Water Mixture ◽  
Oil Water ◽  
Pressure Transmitter ◽  
Inclined Pipes

The need to ensure qualitative and reliable measurement of pressure drop of the oil-water flow cannot be over emphasized. In this regard, this study focused on the investigation of uncertainty in the measurement of pressure drop of oil-water flow in different acrylic pipe inclinations (0, +5ᴼ, +10ᴼ and -5ᴼ) and diameters (30.6-, 55.7- and 74.7-mm ID). The working fluids were tap water and mineral-based hydraulic oil (Shell Tellus S2 V 15), with medium viscosity and density of 24 cP and 872 kgm-3 respectively while the interfacial tension between the water and the oil was 12.9 mN/m at 25 ᴼC. The selected flow conditions were 0.5 and 1.0 m/s mixture velocities each at 0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 input water volume fractions. The repeatability, accuracy of the pressure transmitter, flow rate of the oil-water mixture and holdup (particularly for the inclined flow) were the sources of errors in the measurement of the pressure drop. The results showed that the average relative uncertainties in the pressure drop in 30.6-mm ID pipe were ±4.6 %, ±10.8 %, ±11.2 % and ±10.8 % in the 0ᴼ, +5ᴼ, +10ᴼ and -5ᴼ inclined flows respectively. Similarly, the average relative uncertainties in the pressure drop in the horizontal 55.7-mm and 74.7-mm ID pipes were ±5.7 % and ±7.5 % respectively. The largest contribution to the uncertainty in the pressure drop came from the flow rate and water holdup in the horizontal and inclined pipes respectively. The least contribution in both  horizontal and inclined pipes came from the accuracy of the pressure transmitter. Key words: Oil-water flow; Pressure drops; Standard uncertainty, Combined standard uncertainty; Expanded uncertainty

scholarly journals Evaluation of Mixture Viscosity Models in the Prediction of Two-phase Flow Pressure Drops

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 115 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.Z Aung ◽  
T Yuwono
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Pressure Drops ◽  
Viscosity Models ◽  
Oil Water ◽  
Mixture Viscosity ◽  
Gas Liquid Flow

Nine existing mixture viscosity models were tested for predicting a two-phase pressure drop for oil-water flow and refrigerant (R.134a) flow. The predicted data calculated by using these mixture viscosity models were compared with experimental data. Predicted data from using one group of mixture viscosity models had a good agreement with the experimental data for oil-water two-phase flow. Another group of viscosity models was preferable for gas-liquid flow, but these models gave underestimated values with an error of about 50%. A new and more reliable mixture viscosity model was proposed for use in the prediction of pressure drop in gas-liquid two-phase flow.

Oil/water flow in a horizontal pipe—dispersed flow regime

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-134
Author(s):  
D.S. Santos ◽  
F.A.P. Garcia ◽  
M.G. Rasteiro ◽  
P.M. Faia
Keyword(s):  
Flow Regime ◽  
Water Flow ◽  
Horizontal Pipe ◽  
Dispersed Flow ◽  
Oil Water

Hydrodynamics Study of Oil–Water Flow in Coiled Flow Inverter

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-180
Author(s):  
Anshumaan Dey ◽  
Monisha M. Mandal
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Water Flow ◽  
Viscosity Ratio ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
Phase Distribution ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Chemical Reactor ◽  
Interval Length ◽  
Water Volume ◽  
Oil Water

The present numerical study is an effort to examine the hydrodynamics characteristics of two immiscible liquids (oil and water) flowing in different tubes. i.e., straight, coiled and Coiled Flow Inverter (CFI) tube of equal dimensions. CFI is a novel device in which fluid flow inversion takes place at uniform interval length of tube. The effect of oil-water viscosity ratio (µoil/µwater = 1.6 and 30) on velocity contours, phase distribution and pressure drop in the different tubes were investigated. The present work show that flow pattern of oil–water flows was changed from stratified to annular flows at higher water volume fraction for µoil/µwater = 1.6 in CFI. Phase inversion of oil–water flow was observed in CFI at higher viscosity ratio (µoil/µwater = 30). There was remarkable reduction in pressure drop with the increment in volume fraction of water flowing in coiled as well as CFI. CFI being more compact can be efficiently used in industries as chemical reactor, heat exchanger, mixer, etc.

Pressure drop and flow pattern of oil–water flow for low viscosity oils: Role of mixture viscosity

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mukhaimer ◽  
A. Al-Sarkhi ◽  
M. El Nakla ◽  
W.H. Ahmed ◽  
L. Al-Hadhrami
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Flow Pattern ◽  
Water Flow ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Oil Water ◽  
Mixture Viscosity

Bubble Analogy and Stabilization of Core-Annular Flow

2000 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio C. Bannwart
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Annular Flow ◽  
Momentum Conservation ◽  
Conservation Equation ◽  
Interface Shape ◽  
Laboratory Measurements ◽  
Horizontal Pipe ◽  
The Core ◽  
Oil Water ◽  
Momentum Conservation Equation

A theory for the stabilization of annular liquid-liquid flow (i.e., core-annular flow) in a horizontal pipe is proposed. Based upon the analysis of the momentum conservation equation in the cross section of the flow, including the effects of peripheral flow in the annulus and interfacial tension, an equation is obtained which describes the interface shape. Results for the height-to-width aspect ratio of the core are compared with laboratory measurements done by the author for a heavy oil-water core-annular flow. A criterion for stabilization of this interesting flow pattern is proposed.

scholarly journals Hydrodynamic Modeling of Oil–Water Stratified Smooth Two-Phase Turbulent Flow in Horizontal Circular Pipes

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 5201
Author(s):  
Qi Kang ◽  
Jiapeng Gu ◽  
Xueyu Qi ◽  
Ting Wu ◽  
Shengjie Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Volume Flow Rate ◽  
Horizontal Tube ◽  
Water Interface ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Horizontal Pipe ◽  
Smooth Flow ◽  
Oil Water

In the petrochemical industry, multiphase flow, including oil–water two-phase stratified laminar flow, is more common and can be easily obtained through mathematical analysis. However, there is no mathematical, analytical model for the simulation of oil–water flow under turbulent flow. This paper introduces a two-dimensional (2D) numerical simulation method to investigate the pressure gradient, flow field, and oil–water interface height of a pipeline cross-section of horizontal tube in an oil–water stratified smooth flow, which has field information of a pipeline cross-section compared with a one-dimensional (1D) simulation and avoids the significant calculation required to conduct a three-dimensional (3D) simulation. Three Reynolds average N–S equation models (k−ε, k−ω, SST k−ω) are used to simulate oil–water stratified smooth flow according to the finite volume method. The pressure gradient and oil–water interface height can be computed according to the given volume flow rate using the iteration method. The predicted data of oil–water interface height and velocity profile by the model fit well with some available experiment data, except that there is a large error in pressure gradient. The SST k−ω turbulence model has higher accuracy and is more suitable for simulating oil–water two-phase stratified flow in a horizontal pipe.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document