Risk-Based Seismic Performance Assessment of Pressurized Piping Systems Considering Ratcheting

2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ravi Kiran ◽  
G. R. Reddy ◽  
M. K. Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Frequency Variation ◽  
Seismic Load ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Seismic Performance Assessment ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Piping Systems

Abstract A procedure is described for risk-based seismic performance assessment of pressurized piping systems considering ratcheting. The procedure is demonstrated on a carbon steel piping system considered for OECD-NEA benchmark exercise on quantification of seismic margins. Initially, fragility analysis of the piping system is carried out by considering variability in damping and frequency. Variation in damping is obtained from the statistical analysis of the damping values observed in earlier experiments on piping systems and components. The variation in ground motion is considered by using 20 strong motion records of the intraplate region. Floor motion of a typical reactor building of a nuclear power plant under these actual earthquake records is evaluated and applied to the piping system. The performance evaluation of the piping system in terms of ratcheting is carried out using a numerical approach, which was earlier validated with shake table ratcheting tests on piping components and systems. Three limit states representing performance levels of the piping system under seismic load are considered for fragility evaluation. For each limit state, probability of exceedance at different levels of floor motion is evaluated to generate a fragility curve. Subsequently, the fragility curves of the piping systems are convoluted with hazardous curves for a typical site to obtain the risk in terms of annual probability of occurrence of the performance limits.

Seismic performance assessment of piping systems in bare and infilled RC buildings

2021 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 106897
Author(s):  
Gianni Blasi ◽  
Daniele Perrone ◽  
Maria Antonietta Aiello ◽  
Maria Rosaria Pecce
Keyword(s):  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Seismic Performance Assessment ◽  
Piping Systems

Probabilistic Seismic Response of Coupled Tank-Piping Systems

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Abbiati ◽  
Oreste S. Bursi ◽  
Luca Caracoglia ◽  
Rocco Di Filippo ◽  
Vincenzo La Salandra
Keyword(s):  
Earthquake Engineering ◽  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Coupled Systems ◽  
Piping System ◽  
Actual Behavior ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Industrial Plants ◽  
Stochastic Linearization ◽  
Piping Systems ◽  
Performance Based Earthquake Engineering

Dynamic analysis is an integral part of seismic risk assessment of industrial plants. Such analysis often neglects proper coupling between structures of coupled systems, which introduces uncertainty into the system and may lead to erroneous results, e.g., incorrect fragility curves, in comparison with the actual behavior of the analyzed structure. Hence, it is important to study the effect of uncertainties on the dynamic characteristics of a system, when coupling effects are both neglected and included. Along this line, this paper intends to define and compare the fragility curves of both an isolated (decoupled) and a coupled tank-piping system subjected to seismic loading. In particular, for the decoupled case, we estimated the probability of exceedance of main engineering demand parameters within the Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering (PBEE) framework. Moreover, for the coupled case, to take into account the presence of the tank as boundary condition for the piping system, two sources of uncertainty were considered: i) the tank aspect ratio; ii) the piping-to-tank attachment height ratio. In addition, to model the tank slippage, both a Filtered White Noise (FWN) characterized by a Kanai-Tajimi spectrum and the non-stationarity of the seismic input were taken into account by means of the stochastic linearization. All these elements allow for the estimation of fragility curves for different limit states in the coupled case.

scholarly journals Effects of Near-fault Strong Ground Motions on Probabilistic Structural Seismic-induced Damages

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 796-809
Author(s):  
Farzad Mirzaie Aminian ◽  
Ehsan Khojastehfar ◽  
Hamid Ghanbari
Keyword(s):  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Seismic Performance Assessment ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Performance Levels ◽  
Strong Ground Motions ◽  
Strong Ground

Seismic fragility curves measure induced levels of structural damage against strong ground motions of earthquakes, probabilistically. These curves play an important role in seismic performance assessment, seismic risk analysis and making rational decisions regarding seismic risk management of structures. It has been demonstrated that the calculated fragility curves of structures are changed while the structures are excited by near-field strong ground motions in comparison with far-field ones. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the extents of modification for various performance levels and variety of structural heights. To achieve this goal, Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) method is applied to calculate seismic fragility curves. To investigate the effects of earthquake characteristics, two categories of strong ground motions are assumed through IDA method, i.e. near and far-field sets. To study the extent of modification for various heights of structures, 4 – 6 and 10 stories moment-resisting concrete frames are considered as case studies.  Furthermore, to study the importance of involving near-field strong ground motions in seismic performance assessment of structures, the damage levels are considered as the renowned structural performance levels (i.e. Immediate Occupancy, Life Safety, Collapse Prevention and Sidesway Collapse). Achieved results show that the fragility curve of low-rise frame (i.e. 4-story case study) for IO limit state presents more probability of damage applying near-fault sets in comparison with far-fault set. Investigating fragility curves of the other performance levels (i.e. LS, CP and Collapse) and the higher frames, a straightforward conclusion, regarding probability of damage. To achieve the rational results for the higher frames, mean annual frequency of exceedance (MAFE) and probability of exceeding limit states in 50 years are calculated. MAFE is defined as the integration of structural fragility curve over seismic hazard curve. According to the achieved results for 6-story frame, if the structure is excited by near-field strong ground motions the probability of exceedance for LS, CP and collapse limit states in 50 years will be increased up to 11%, 2.4%, 0.7% and 0.4% respectively, comparing with the calculated probabilities while far-field strong ground motions are applied. On the other hand, while the 10-story case study is excited by near-field strong ground motions, the exceedance probability values for mentioned limit states decreases up to 20%, 5%, 4% and 4%, respectively. Consequently, it can be concluded that the lower is the height of the structure, the more will be the increment of probability of damage in the near-field conditions. Furthermore, this increment is much more for IO limit state in comparison with other limit states. These facts can be applied as a precaution for seismic design of low-rise structures, while they are located at the vicinity of active faults.

Seismic performance assessment of multi-story steel frames with curved dampers and semi-rigid connections

2021 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 106666
Author(s):  
S.F. Fathizadeh ◽  
S. Dehghani ◽  
T.Y. Yang ◽  
A.R. Vosoughi ◽  
E. Noroozinejad Farsangi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Steel Frames ◽  
Seismic Performance Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document