Mobilization of Crude Oil in Porous Media With Oil-Soluble Surfactant Delivered by Hydrosoluble Micelles

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chike G. Ezeh ◽  
Yufei Duan ◽  
Riccardo Rausa ◽  
Kyriakos D. Papadopoulos

In this work, an oil-soluble surfactant was studied to enhance crude oil mobilization in a cryolite-packed miniature bed. The cryolite packed bed provided a transparent, random porous medium for observation at the microscopic level. In the first part of the paper, oil-soluble surfactants, Span 80 and Eni-surfactant (ES), were dissolved directly into the crude oil. The porous medium was imbued with the crude oil (containing the surfactants), and de-ionized water was the flooding phase; in this experiment, the system containing ES had the best performance. Subsequently, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a hydrosoluble surfactant, was used to solubilize the ES, with the SDS acting as a carrier for the ES to the contaminated porous media. Finally, the SDS/ES micellar solutions were used in oil-removal tests on the packed bed. Grayscale image analysis was used to quantify the oil recovery effectiveness for the flooding experiments by measuring the white pixel percentage in the packed bed images. The SDS/ES flooding mixture had a better performance than the SDS alone.

1984 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. 399-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Fassihi ◽  
William E. Brigham ◽  
Henry J. Ramey

Abstract Continuous analysis of produced gases from a small packed bed reactor, at both isothermal and linearly increasing temperatures, has shown that combustion of crude oil in porous media follows several consecutive reactions. Molar carbon dioxide/carbon monoxide (CO2/CO) and apparent hydrogen/carbon (H/C) ratios were used to observe the transition between these reactions at different temperature levels. A new kinetic model for oxidation of crude oil in porous media is presented in Part 2 of this paper (Page 408) Introduction The quantity of fuel consumed and the reaction rate within the burning zone have been studied intensively for two reasons. First, the maximum oil recovery is the difference of the original oil in place (OOIP) at the start of the operation and the oil consumed as fuel. Second, one of the most important factors in the economic evaluation of any in-situ combustion project is the cost of air compression. Excessive fuel deposition causes a slow rate of advance of the burning front and large air compression costs. However, if the fuel concentration is too low, the heat of combustion will not be sufficient to raise the temperature of the rock and the contained fluids to a level of self-sustained combustion. This may lead to combustion failure. Thus, it is necessary to understand the reactions occurring at different temperatures as the combustion front moves in the porous medium. The most crucial and yet least understood zone of insitu combustion oil recovery is the burning front, where temperature reaches a maximum value. The velocity of the burning front is controlled by the chemical reactions involved. However, since crude oil is a mixture of hydrocarbons, it is necessary to consider a global description of the reaction mechanism. Reaction Mechanism The reaction between fuel and oxygen in a forward combustion process is a heterogeneous flow reaction. Injected oxidant gas must pass through the burning zone to make the burning front move. Within the burning zone, four known transport processes occur:oxygen diffuses from the bulk gas stream to the fuel interface; then, perhaps,the oxygen absorbs and reacts with the fuel;then combustion products desorb; andproducts finally transfer into the bulk gas stream. If any of these steps is inherently much slower than the remaining ones, the overall rate will be controlled by that step. Also, the rate of each series of steps must be equal in the steadystate condition. However, there are no useful correlations for computing absorption and desorption of oxygen in a porous medium. Consequently, consideration of these phenomena becomes extremely difficult for even simple reactions. Theoretical expressions for postulated mechanisms often contain 10 or more arbitrary constants. Because of the large number of arbitrary constants, sever-al expressions developed for widely different mechanisms often will match experimental data equally well. In general, the combustion rate, Rc, of crude oil in a porous medium can be described as dCm m nRc = - ------ = kpo2 Cm,............................(1)dt whereCm = instantaneous concentration of fuel, k = rate constant, Po2 = partial pressure of oxygen, andm, n = reaction orders. The reaction constant, k, is often a function of temperature, T, as expressed by k=w exp(– E/RT).......................................(2) where E is the activation energy, w is the Arrhenius constant, and R is the universal gas constant. For heterogeneous reactions, the constant w is a function of the surface area of the rock. Early studies of crude oil oxidation in a porous medium were mostly qualitative. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) was performed on samples of crude oil, and the resulting thermograms represented the thermal history of each sample as it was heated at a uniform rate (usually 18 degrees F/min [10 degrees C/min]) in a constant air flow (usually 277 mL/min [277 cm3/min]). These thermograms indicated the presence of a number of exothermic reactions. Another method of analysis is thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Here, a sample of crude oil is weighed continuously as it is heated at a constant rate. The resulting curve of weight change vs. time or temperature indicates the occurrence of at least two reactions at different temperatures. SPEJ P. 399^


Author(s):  
Hsiang-Lan Yeh ◽  
Jaime J. Juárez

In this study, we examine microscale waterflooding in a randomly close-packed porous medium. Three different porosities are prepared in a microfluidic platform and saturated with silicone oil. Optical video fluorescence microscopy is used to track the water front as it flows through the porous packed bed. The degree of water saturation is compared to water containing two different types of chemical modifiers, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), with water in the absence of a surfactant used as a control. Image analysis of our video data yield saturation curves and calculate fractal dimension, which we use to identify how morphology changes the way an invading water phase moves through the porous media. An inverse analysis based on the implicit pressure explicit saturation (IMPES) simulation technique uses mobility ratio as an adjustable parameter to fit our experimental saturation curves. The results from our inverse analysis combined with our image analysis show that this platform can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of surfactants or polymers as additives for enhancing the transport of water through an oil-saturated porous medium.


1965 ◽  
Vol 5 (04) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
George G. Bernard ◽  
W.L. Jacobs

Abstract The effect of foam on the permeability of porous media to water was studied as a function of foaming agent concentration, specific permeability, pressure gradient, length of a porous medium and its oil saturation. At a given fluid saturation in a porous medium, the permeability to water was found to be the same whether foam was present or not. Foam decreases the permeability to water by developing a higher trapped gas saturation than that obtained by water flooding without foam present. Increasing the concentration of foaming agent increased the trapped gas saturation and thereby decreased the permeability to water. The presence of oil reduced the capability of most foaming agents to decrease the permeability of a porous medium to water. A few surfactants were found to be effective foaming agents even in the presence of oil. These results are similar to those reported in a previous paper on the effect of foam on the permeability of porous media to gas. The effect of foam was found to persist in long porous media at moderately high reservoir temperatures and during the passage of many pore volumes of surfactant-free water. Introduction This paper describes part of a study on. a novel approach in the use of surfactants for oil recovery; the use of foam rather than water to displace oil. Previously it was found that foam can displace oil which normally is not displaced by water. The foam is formed by successively injecting a suitable surfactant solution and gas into a porous medium. Foam appears to have at least two uses in the field:it shows promise as a superior oil recovery agent, andit shows promise as a selective permeability reducing agent. Foam may be very useful in water floods, or in other oil recovery processes, where highly permeable streaks or unfavorable mobility ratios are a problem. A previous paper reported the effect of foam on the permeability of porous media to gas. In the present study the effect of foam on the permeability of porous media to water is reported. The specific objectives of the study were to determine:the effect of foam on the permeability to water in porous media of various specific permeabilities,the effect of foam on the permeability to water in the presence of oil,the effect of foam and crude oil on the trapped gas saturation,the effect of foam on permeability to water at trapped gas saturation,the effect of pressure gradient on the permeability to water under foaming conditions,the persistence of foam during the passage of surfactant-free water through the porous medium, andthe effect of various foaming agents, length of the porous medium and temperature on the permeability reduction caused by foam. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS The experimental apparatus consisted of consolidated and unconsolidated porous media, wet test meters and constant delivery pumps. The porous media consisted of consolidated sandstone cores (6 to 36 in. long), and unconsolidated sand packs (3 to 30 ft long). The consolidated cores had permeabilities of 32 and 1,000 md and porosities of about 20 per cent. The sand packs had permeabilities of 3,500 to 211,000 md and porosities of about 40 per cent. (Throughout this report a term such as "100 md sand" is used. This term means that the porous medium had a dry, nitrogen permeability of 100 md.)Fluids used in the experiments were distilled water, 1 per cent NaCl solution, aqueous solutions of foaming agents, nitrogen gas, air and crude oil. SPEJ P. 295ˆ


1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (06) ◽  
pp. 962-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Novosad

Novosad, J., SPE, Petroleum Recovery Inst. Abstract Experimental procedures designed to differentiate between surfactant retained in porous media because of adsorption and surfactant retained because Of unfavorable phase behavior are developed and tested with three types of surfactants. Several series of experiments with systematic changes in one variable such as surfactant/cosurfactant ratio, slug size, or temperature are performed, and overall surfactant retention then is interpreted in terms of adsorption and losses caused by unfavorable phase behavior. Introduction Adsorption of surfactants considered for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications has been studied extensively in the last few years since it has been shown that it is possible to develop surfactant systems that displace oil from porous media almost completely when used in large quantities. Effective oil recovery by surfactants is not a question of principle but rather a question of economics. Since surfactants are more expensive than crude oil, development of a practical EOR technology depends on how much surfactant can be sacrificed economically while recovering additional crude oil from a reservoir.It was recognized earlier that adsorption may be only one of a number of factors that contribute to total surfactant retention. Other mechanisms may include surfactant entrapment in an immobile oil phase surfactant precipitation by divalent ions, surfactant precipitation caused by a separation of the cosurfactant from the surfactant, and surfactant precipitation resulting from chromatographic separation of different surfactant specks. The principal objective of this work is to evaluate the experimental techniques that can be used for measuring surfactant adsorption and to study experimentally two mechanisms responsible for surfactant retention. Specifically, we try to differentiate between the adsorption of surfactants at the solid/liquid interface and the retention of the surfactants because of trapping in the immobile hydrocarbon phase that remains within the core following a surfactant flood. Measurement of Adsorption at the Solid/Liquid Interface Previous adsorption measurements of surfactants considered for EOR produced adsorption isotherms of unusual shapes and unexpected features. Primarily, an adsorption maximum was observed when total surfactant retention was plotted against the concentration of injected surfactant. Numerous explanations have been offered for these peaks, such as a formation of mixed micelles, the effects of structure-forming and structurebreaking cations, and the precipitation and consequent redissolution of divalent ions. It is difficult to assess which of these effects is responsible for the peaks in a particular situation and their relative importance. However, in view of the number of physicochemical processes taking place simultaneously and the large number of components present in most systems, it seems that we should not expect smooth monotonically increasing isotherms patterned after adsorption isothemes obtained with one pure component and a solvent. Also, it should be realized that most experimental procedures do not yield an amount of surfactant adsorbed but rather a measure of the surface excess.An adsorption isotherm, expressed in terms of the surface excess as a function of an equilibrium surfactant concentration, by definition must contain a maximum if the data are measured over a sufficiently wide range of concentrations. SPEJ P. 962^


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junrong Liu ◽  
Lu Sun ◽  
Zunzhao Li ◽  
Xingru Wu

CO2 flooding is an important method for improving oil recovery for reservoirs with low permeability. Even though CO2 could be miscible with oil in regions nearby injection wells, the miscibility could be lost in deep reservoirs because of low pressure and the dispersion effect. Reducing the CO2–oil miscibility pressure can enlarge the miscible zone, particularly when the reservoir pressure is less than the needed minimum miscible pressure (MMP). Furthermore, adding intermediate hydrocarbons in the CO2–oil system can also lower the interfacial tension (IFT). In this study, we used dead crude oil from the H Block in the X oilfield to study the IFT and the MMP changes with different hydrocarbon agents. The hydrocarbon agents, including alkanes, alcohols, oil-soluble surfactants, and petroleum ethers, were mixed with the crude oil samples from the H Block, and their performances on reducing CO2–oil IFT and CO2–oil MMP were determined. Experimental results show that the CO2–oil MMP could be reduced by 6.19 MPa or 12.17% with petroleum ether in the boiling range of 30–60 °C. The effects of mass concentration of hydrocarbon agents on CO2–oil IFT and crude oil viscosity indicate that the petroleum ether in the boiling range of 30–60 °C with a mass concentration of 0.5% would be the best hydrocarbon agent for implementing CO2 miscible flooding in the H Block.


Author(s):  
Shabina Ashraf ◽  
Jyoti Phirani

Abstract Capillary impregnation of viscous fluids in porous media is useful in diagnostics, design of lab-on-chip devices and enhanced oil recovery. The impregnation of a wetting fluid in a homogeneous porous medium follows Washburn’s diffusive law. The diffusive dynamics predicts that, with the increase in permeability, the rate of spontaneous imbibition of a wetting fluid also increases. As most of the naturally occurring porous media are composed of hydrodynamically interacting layers having different properties, the impregnation in a heterogeneous porous medium is significantly different from a homogeneous porous medium. A Washburn like model has been developed in the past to predict the imbibition behavior in the layers for a hydrodynamically interacting three layered porous medium filled with a non-viscous resident phase. It was observed that the relative placement of the layers impacts the imbibition phenomena significantly. In this work, we develop a quasi one-dimensional lubrication approximation to predict the imbibition dynamics in a hydrodynamically interacting multi-layered porous medium. The generalized model shows that the arrangement of layers strongly affects the saturation of wetting phase in the porous medium, which is crucial for oil recovery and in microfluidic applications.


Author(s):  
Narendra Kumar ◽  
Saif Ali ◽  
Amit Kumar ◽  
Ajay Mandal

Mobilization of crude oil from the subsurface porous media by emulsion injection is one of the Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (C-EOR) techniques. However, deterioration of emulsion by phase separation under harsh reservoir conditions like high salinity, acidic or alkaline nature and high temperature pose a challenge for the emulsion to be a successful EOR agent. Present study aims at formulation of Oil-in-Water (O/W) emulsion stabilized by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) using the optimum values of independent variables – salinity, pH and temperature. The influence of above parameters on the physiochemical properties of the emulsion such as average droplet size, zeta (ζ) potential, conductivity and rheological properties were investigated to optimize the properties. The influence of complex interactions of independent variables on emulsion characteristics were premeditated by experimental model obtained by Taguchi Orthogonal Array (TOA) method. Accuracy and significance of the experimental model was verified using Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA). Results indicated that the experimental models were significantly (p < 0.05) fitted with main influence of salinity (making it a critical variable) followed by its interactions with pH and temperature for all the responses studied for the emulsion properties. No significant difference between the predicted and experimental response values of emulsion ensured the adequacy of the experimental model. Formulated optimized emulsion manifested good stability with 2417.73 nm droplet size, −72.52 mV ζ-potential and a stable rheological (viscosity and viscoelastic) behavior at extensive temperature range. Ultralow Interfacial Tension (IFT) value of 2.22E-05 mN/m was obtained at the interface of crude oil and the emulsion. A favorable wettability alteration of rock from intermediate-wet to water-wet was revealed by contact angle measurement and an enhanced emulsification behavior with crude oil by miscibility test. A tertiary recovery of 21.03% of Original Oil In Place (OOIP) was obtained on sandstone core by optimized emulsion injection. Therefore, performance assessment of optimized emulsion under reservoir conditions confirms its capability as an effective oil-displacing agent.


Author(s):  
Calvin Lumban Gaol ◽  
Leonhard Ganzer ◽  
Soujatya Mukherjee ◽  
Hakan Alkan

The presence of microorganisms could alter the porous medium permeability, which is vital for several applications, including aquifer storage and recovery (ASR), enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and underground hydrogen storage.


1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 328-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Raza

Abstract A laboratory study was made of the variables which affect the generation, propagation, quality und nature of foam produced inside a porous medium. It is shown that foam can be generated and propagated in porous media representative of reservoir rocks at pressure levels ranging from atmospheric to 1,000 psig, and under pressure differentials ranging from 1.0 to 50 psi/ft. The quality of foam depends on the type of foaming agent, the concentration of foaming solution, the physical properties of the porous medium, the pressure level, and the composition and saturation of fluids present. The nature of foam depends upon the type of foaming agent and its concentration in the foaming solution. The study shows that the flow behavior of foam in a porous medium is a complex one which cannot he correctly described in terms of the high apparent viscosity of foam. Also, the concept of relative permeability is not applicable to the flow of foam due to the associative nature of its components. On the basis of the discussed characteristics of foam, several applications of foam are suggested in oil recovery processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document