Influence of the Level of Muscular Redundancy on the Validity of a Musculoskeletal Model

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florent Moissenet ◽  
Laurence Chèze ◽  
Raphaël Dumas
Keyword(s):  
Gait Pattern ◽  
Musculoskeletal Model ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Generic Model ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Contact Points ◽  
Lateral Contact ◽  
Musculoskeletal Models ◽  
Joint Contact

While recent literature has clearly demonstrated that an extensive personalization of the musculoskeletal models was necessary to reach high accuracy, several components of the generic models may be further investigated before defining subject-specific parameters. Among others, the choice in muscular geometry and thus the level of muscular redundancy in the model may have a noticeable influence on the predicted musculotendon and joint contact forces. In this context, the aim of this study was to investigate if the level of muscular redundancy can contribute or not to reduce inaccuracies in tibiofemoral contact forces predictions. For that, the dataset disseminated through the Sixth Grand Challenge Competition to Predict In Vivo Knee Loads was applied to a versatile 3D lower limb musculoskeletal model in which two muscular geometries (i.e., two different levels of muscular redundancy) were implemented. This dataset provides tibiofemoral implant measurements for both medial and lateral compartments and thus allows evaluation of the validity of the model predictions. The results suggest that an increase of the level of muscular redundancy corresponds to a better accuracy of total tibiofemoral contact force whatever the gait pattern investigated. However, the medial and lateral contact forces ratio and accuracy were not necessarily improved when increasing the level of muscular redundancy and may thus be attributed to other parameters such as the location of contact points. To conclude, the muscular geometry, among other components of the generic model, has a noticeable impact on joint contact forces predictions and may thus be correctly chosen even before trying to personalize the model.

scholarly journals Update on Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in Vivo Knee Loads

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison L. Kinney ◽  
Thor F. Besier ◽  
Darryl D. D'Lima ◽  
Benjamin J. Fregly
Keyword(s):  
Contact Force ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Single Subject ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Muscle Forces ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Lateral Contact ◽  
Musculoskeletal Models ◽  
Rms Errors

Validation is critical if clinicians are to use musculoskeletal models to optimize treatment of individual patients with a variety of musculoskeletal disorders. This paper provides an update on the annual Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in Vivo Knee Loads, a unique opportunity for direct validation of knee contact forces and indirect validation of knee muscle forces predicted by musculoskeletal models. Three competitions (2010, 2011, and 2012) have been held at the annual American Society of Mechanical Engineers Summer Bioengineering Conference, and two more competitions are planned for the 2013 and 2014 conferences. Each year of the competition, a comprehensive data set collected from a single subject implanted with a force-measuring knee replacement is released. Competitors predict medial and lateral knee contact forces for two gait trials without knowledge of the experimental knee contact force measurements. Predictions are evaluated by calculating root-mean-square (RMS) errors and R2 values relative to the experimentally measured medial and lateral contact forces. For the first three years of the competition, competitors used a variety of methods to predict knee contact and muscle forces, including static and dynamic optimization, EMG-driven models, and parametric numerical models. Overall, errors in predicted contact forces were comparable across years, with average RMS errors for the four competition winners ranging from 229 N to 312 N for medial contact force and from 238 N to 326 N for lateral contact force. Competitors generally predicted variations in medial contact force (highest R2 = 0.91) better than variations in lateral contact force (highest R2 = 0.70). Thus, significant room for improvement exists in the remaining two competitions. The entire musculoskeletal modeling community is encouraged to use the competition data and models for their own model validation efforts.

scholarly journals Concurrent Prediction of Muscle and Tibiofemoral Contact Forces During Treadmill Gait

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trent M. Guess ◽  
Antonis P. Stylianou ◽  
Mohammad Kia
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Component ◽  
Gait Cycle ◽  
Musculoskeletal Model ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Subject Specific ◽  
The Right ◽  
Anterior Posterior ◽  
Rms Errors

Detailed knowledge of knee kinematics and dynamic loading is essential for improving the design and outcomes of surgical procedures, tissue engineering applications, prosthetics design, and rehabilitation. This study used publicly available data provided by the “Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in-vivo Knee Loads” for the 2013 American Society of Mechanical Engineers Summer Bioengineering Conference (Fregly et al., 2012, “Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in vivo Knee Loads,” J. Orthop. Res., 30, pp. 503–513) to develop a full body, musculoskeletal model with subject specific right leg geometries that can concurrently predict muscle forces, ligament forces, and knee and ground contact forces. The model includes representation of foot/floor interactions and predicted tibiofemoral joint loads were compared to measured tibial loads for two different cycles of treadmill gait. The model used anthropometric data (height and weight) to scale the joint center locations and mass properties of a generic model and then used subject bone geometries to more accurately position the hip and ankle. The musculoskeletal model included 44 muscles on the right leg, and subject specific geometries were used to create a 12 degrees-of-freedom anatomical right knee that included both patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations. Tibiofemoral motion was constrained by deformable contacts defined between the tibial insert and femoral component geometries and by ligaments. Patellofemoral motion was constrained by contact between the patellar button and femoral component geometries and the patellar tendon. Shoe geometries were added to the feet, and shoe motion was constrained by contact between three shoe segments per foot and the treadmill surface. Six-axis springs constrained motion between the feet and shoe segments. Experimental motion capture data provided input to an inverse kinematics stage, and the final forward dynamics simulations tracked joint angle errors for the left leg and upper body and tracked muscle length errors for the right leg. The one cycle RMS errors between the predicted and measured tibia contact were 178 N and 168 N for the medial and lateral sides for the first gait cycle and 209 N and 228 N for the medial and lateral sides for the faster second gait cycle. One cycle RMS errors between predicted and measured ground reaction forces were 12 N, 13 N, and 65 N in the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical directions for the first gait cycle and 43 N, 15 N, and 96 N in the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical directions for the second gait cycle.

Evaluation of Predicted Knee Joint Muscle Forces During Gait Using an Instrumented Knee Implant

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin W. Fernandez ◽  
Hyung J. Kim ◽  
Massoud Akbarshahi ◽  
Jonathan P. Walter ◽  
Benjamin J. Fregly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contact Forces ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Muscle Forces ◽  
Model Calculations ◽  
Musculoskeletal Models ◽  
Model Predictions ◽  
Joint Contact ◽  
Knee Muscle

Many studies have used musculoskeletal models to predict in vivo muscle forces at the knee during gait [1, 2]. Unfortunately, quantitative assessment of the model calculations is often impracticable. Various indirect methods have been used to evaluate the accuracy of model predictions, including comparisons against measurements of muscle activity, joint kinematics, ground reaction forces, and joint moments. In a recent study, an instrumented hip implant was used to validate calculations of hip contact forces directly [3]. The same model was subsequently used to validate model calculations of tibiofemoral loading during gait [4]. Instrumented knee implants have also been used in in vitro and in vivo studies to quantify differences in biomechanical performance between various TKR designs [5, 6]. The main aim of the present study was to evaluate model predictions of knee muscle forces by direct comparison with measurements obtained from an instrumented knee implant. Calculations of muscle and joint-contact loading were performed for level walking at slow, normal, and fast speeds.

scholarly journals Prediction of knee loading in native knee and total knee arthroplasty : a forward dynamics computational study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Swithin Samuel Razu
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Musculoskeletal Model ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Muscle Forces ◽  
Model Predictions ◽  
Subject Specific ◽  
Joint Contact ◽  
Total Knee

"The goal of this dissertation is to develop a musculoskeletal model and corroborate model predictions to experimentally measured in vivo knee contact forces, in order to study the biomechanical consequences of two different total knee arthroplasty designs. The two main contributions of this dissertation are: (1) Corroboration to experimental data: The development of an EMG-driven, full-body, musculoskeletal model with subject-specific leg geometries including deformable contacts, ligaments, 6DOF knee joint, and a shoe-floor model that can concurrently predict muscle forces, ligament forces, and joint contact forces. Model predictions of tibiofemoral joint contact forces were evaluated against the subject-specific in vivo measurements from the instrumented TKR for three distinctly different styles of over ground gait. (2) Virtual surgery in TKA: The musculoskeletal modeling methodology was then used to develop a model for one healthy participant with a native knee and then virtually replacing the native knee with fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty designs performing gait and step-up tasks. This approach minimized the biomechanical impact of variations in sex, geometry, implant size, design and positioning, ligament location and tension, and muscle forces found across patients. The differences in biomechanics were compared for the two designs. 1.2 Significance of this Research The world health organization ranks musculoskeletal disorders as the second largest contributor to disability worldwide. Conservative estimates put the national cost of direct care for musculoskeletal disease at $212.7 billion a year [1]. Many people who suffer from neuromuscular or musculoskeletal diseases may benefit from the insights gained from surgery simulations, since musculoskeletal reconstructions are commonly performed on these individuals. Improved surgical outcomes will benefit these individuals not only in the short-term, but also in the long-term, since their future rehabilitation needs may be reduced. For example, although total knee arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of osteoarthritis with over 700,000 procedures performed each year [2], many patients are unhappy with the ultimate results [3]. Ten to 30% of patients report [4] pain, dissatisfaction with function, and the need for further surgery such as revision after the initial surgery resulting in costs exceeding $11 billion [5]. Potentially, simulation studies that quantify the important biomechanical variables will reduce the need for revision surgeries in patients."--Introduction.

scholarly journals An Electromyogram-Driven Musculoskeletal Model of the Knee to Predict in Vivo Joint Contact Forces During Normal and Novel Gait Patterns

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt Manal ◽  
Thomas S. Buchanan
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Contact Force ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Normal Walking ◽  
Gait Patterns ◽  
Internal Joint ◽  
Model Predictions ◽  
Joint Contact

Computational models that predict internal joint forces have the potential to enhance our understanding of normal and pathological movement. Validation studies of modeling results are necessary if such models are to be adopted by clinicians to complement patient treatment and rehabilitation. The purposes of this paper are: (1) to describe an electromyogram (EMG)-driven modeling approach to predict knee joint contact forces, and (2) to evaluate the accuracy of model predictions for two distinctly different gait patterns (normal walking and medial thrust gait) against known values for a patient with a force recording knee prosthesis. Blinded model predictions and revised model estimates for knee joint contact forces are reported for our entry in the 2012 Grand Challenge to predict in vivo knee loads. The EMG-driven model correctly predicted that medial compartment contact force for the medial thrust gait increased despite the decrease in knee adduction moment. Model accuracy was high: the difference in peak loading was less than 0.01 bodyweight (BW) with an R2 = 0.92. The model also predicted lateral loading for the normal walking trial with good accuracy exhibiting a peak loading difference of 0.04 BW and an R2 = 0.44. Overall, the EMG-driven model captured the general shape and timing of the contact force profiles and with accurate input data the model estimated joint contact forces with sufficient accuracy to enhance the interpretation of joint loading beyond what is possible from data obtained from standard motion capture studies.

A Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Modeling Framework to Predict In Vivo Mechanics of Total Knee Arthroplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco A. Marra ◽  
Valentine Vanheule ◽  
René Fluit ◽  
Bart H. F. J. M. Koopman ◽  
John Rasmussen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Kinematics ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Modeling Framework ◽  
Trial Simulation ◽  
Subject Specific ◽  
Joint Contact ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Right

Musculoskeletal (MS) models should be able to integrate patient-specific MS architecture and undergo thorough validation prior to their introduction into clinical practice. We present a methodology to develop subject-specific models able to simultaneously predict muscle, ligament, and knee joint contact forces along with secondary knee kinematics. The MS architecture of a generic cadaver-based model was scaled using an advanced morphing technique to the subject-specific morphology of a patient implanted with an instrumented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) available in the fifth “grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads” dataset. We implemented two separate knee models, one employing traditional hinge constraints, which was solved using an inverse dynamics technique, and another one using an 11-degree-of-freedom (DOF) representation of the tibiofemoral (TF) and patellofemoral (PF) joints, which was solved using a combined inverse dynamic and quasi-static analysis, called force-dependent kinematics (FDK). TF joint forces for one gait and one right-turn trial and secondary knee kinematics for one unloaded leg-swing trial were predicted and evaluated using experimental data available in the grand challenge dataset. Total compressive TF contact forces were predicted by both hinge and FDK knee models with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) and a coefficient of determination (R2) smaller than 0.3 body weight (BW) and equal to 0.9 in the gait trial simulation and smaller than 0.4 BW and larger than 0.8 in the right-turn trial simulation, respectively. Total, medial, and lateral TF joint contact force predictions were highly similar, regardless of the type of knee model used. Medial (respectively lateral) TF forces were over- (respectively, under-) predicted with a magnitude error of M < 0.2 (respectively > −0.4) in the gait trial, and under- (respectively, over-) predicted with a magnitude error of M > −0.4 (respectively < 0.3) in the right-turn trial. Secondary knee kinematics from the unloaded leg-swing trial were overall better approximated using the FDK model (average Sprague and Geers' combined error C = 0.06) than when using a hinged knee model (C = 0.34). The proposed modeling approach allows detailed subject-specific scaling and personalization and does not contain any nonphysiological parameters. This modeling framework has potential applications in aiding the clinical decision-making in orthopedics procedures and as a tool for virtual implant design.

scholarly journals In Vivo Knee Contact Force Prediction Using Patient-Specific Musculoskeletal Geometry in a Segment-Based Computational Model

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyun Ding ◽  
Daniel Nolte ◽  
Chui Kit Tsang ◽  
Daniel J. Cleather ◽  
Angela E. Kedgley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Normal Gait ◽  
Musculoskeletal Models ◽  
Mean Square Errors

Segment-based musculoskeletal models allow the prediction of muscle, ligament, and joint forces without making assumptions regarding joint degrees-of-freedom (DOF). The dataset published for the “Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in vivo Knee Loads” provides directly measured tibiofemoral contact forces for activities of daily living (ADL). For the Sixth Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in vivo Knee Loads, blinded results for “smooth” and “bouncy” gait trials were predicted using a customized patient-specific musculoskeletal model. For an unblinded comparison, the following modifications were made to improve the predictions: further customizations, including modifications to the knee center of rotation; reductions to the maximum allowable muscle forces to represent known loss of strength in knee arthroplasty patients; and a kinematic constraint to the hip joint to address the sensitivity of the segment-based approach to motion tracking artifact. For validation, the improved model was applied to normal gait, squat, and sit-to-stand for three subjects. Comparisons of the predictions with measured contact forces showed that segment-based musculoskeletal models using patient-specific input data can estimate tibiofemoral contact forces with root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.48–0.65 times body weight (BW) for normal gait trials. Comparisons between measured and predicted tibiofemoral contact forces yielded an average coefficient of determination of 0.81 and RMSEs of 0.46–1.01 times BW for squatting and 0.70–0.99 times BW for sit-to-stand tasks. This is comparable to the best validations in the literature using alternative models.

Grand Challenge Competition: A Parametric Numerical Model to Predict In Vivo Medial and Lateral Knee Forces in Walking Gaits

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Knowlton ◽  
Markus A. Wimmer ◽  
Hannah J. Lundberg
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Computational Models ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Total Knee Replacements ◽  
Lateral Contact ◽  
Total Knee

Numerical models are necessary to estimate forces through the knee joint during activities of daily living. However, the numerous muscles and soft tissues crossing the knee joint result in a computationally indeterminate problem. The recent availability of measured contact force data from telemeterized total knee replacements (TKRs) has given researchers the chance to validate models, but telemeterized TKRs represent only a few patients with a specific implant type. Computational models remain necessary to bridge the gap between the small instrumented patient population with a particular implant and larger patient populations executing various activities. Abstracted gait data from another lab tests the versatility of any model to accurately predict forces of TKR patients performing a variety of gaits with disparate implant types. In this study, we calculate and examine the differences between medial and lateral contact forces in level walking and medial thrust gait trials from a freely provided dataset1.

How Well Does a Musculoskeletal Model Predict GH-Joint Contact Forces? Comparison With In-Vivo Data

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Asadi Nikooyan ◽  
H. E. J. Veeger ◽  
P. Westerhoff ◽  
F. Graichen ◽  
G. Bergmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Musculoskeletal Model ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Joint Reaction Forces ◽  
Joint Contact ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Quantitative Validation ◽  
Joint Reaction

The Delft Shoulder and Elbow Model (DSEM), a large-scale musculoskeletal model, allows for estimation of individual muscle and joint reaction forces in the shoulder and elbow complex. Although the model has been qualitatively verified previously using EMG signals, quantitative validation has not yet been feasible. In this paper we report on the validation of the DSEM by comparing the GH-joint contact forces estimated by the DSEM with the in-vivo forces measured by a recently developed instrumented shoulder endoprosthesis, capable of measuring the glenohumeral (GH) joint contact forces in-vivo [1]. To validate the model, two patients with instrumented shoulder hemi-arthroplasty were measured. The measurement process included the collection of motion data as well as in-vivo joint reaction forces. Segment and joint angles were used as the model inputs to estimate the GH-joint contact forces. The estimated and recorded GH-joint contact forces for Range of Motion (RoM) and force tasks were compared based on the magnitude of the resultant forces. The results show that the estimated force follows the measured force for abduction and anteflexion motions up to 80 and 50 degrees arm elevations, respectively, while they show different behaviors for angles above 90 degrees (decrease is estimated but increase is measured). The DSEM underestimates the peak force for RoM (up to 38% for abduction motion and 64% for anteflexion motion), while overestimates the peak forces (up to 90%) for most directions of performing the force tasks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document