Pressure Gradient Effects on Smooth and Rough Surface Turbulent Boundary Layers—Part I: Favorable Pressure Gradient

2014 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju Hyun Shin ◽  
Seung Jin Song
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Average Roughness ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Velocity Defect ◽  
The Mean

The effects of the pressure gradient and surface roughness on turbulent boundary layers have been experimentally investigated. In Part I, smooth- and rough-surface turbulent boundary layers with and without favorable pressure gradients (FPG) are presented. All of the tests have been conducted at the same Reynolds number (based on the length of the flat plate) of 900,000. Streamwise time-mean and fluctuating velocities have been measured using a single-sensor hot-wire probe. For smooth surfaces, the FPG decreases the mean velocity defect and increases the wall shear stress; however, the friction coefficient hardly changes due to the increased freestream velocity. The FPG effect on the streamwise normal Reynolds stress has been examined. The FPG increases the streamwise normal Reynolds stress for y less than 0.6 times the boundary layer thickness. With the zero pressure gradient (ZPG), the roughness increases the mean velocity defect throughout the boundary layer and increases the normal Reynolds stress for y greater than twice the average roughness height. The roughness effect on the mean velocity defect is stronger under the FPG than under the ZPG for y less than 30 times the average roughness height. For y less than 25 times the average roughness height, the roughness effect of increasing normal Reynolds stress is also stronger under the FPG than under the ZPG. Consequently, for a rough surface, the FPG increases the integrated streamwise turbulent kinetic energy, friction coefficient, roughness Reynolds number, and roughness shift. Furthermore, the FPG increases the roughness effects on the integral boundary layer parameters—the boundary layer thickness, momentum thickness, ratio of the displacement thickness to the boundary layer thickness, and shape factor. Thus, the FPG augments the roughness effects on turbulent boundary layers.

Pressure Gradient Effects on Smooth- and Rough-Surface Turbulent Boundary Layers—Part II: Adverse Pressure Gradient

2014 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju Hyun Shin ◽  
Seung Jin Song
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Roughness Effects ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Velocity Defect

An experimental investigation has been conducted to identify the effects of pressure gradient and surface roughness on turbulent boundary layers. In Part II, smooth- and rough-surface turbulent boundary layers with and without adverse pressure gradient (APG) are presented at a fixed Reynolds number (based on the length of flat plate) of 900,000. Flat-plate boundary layer measurements have been conducted using a single-sensor, hot-wire probe. For smooth surfaces, compared to the zero pressure gradient (ZPG) boundary layer, the APG boundary layer has a higher mean velocity defect throughout the boundary layer and lower friction coefficient. APG decreases the streamwise normal Reynolds stress for y less than 0.4 times the boundary layer thickness and increases it slightly in the outer region. For rough surfaces, APG reduces the roughness effects of increasing the mean velocity defect and normal Reynolds stress for y less than 23 and 28 times the average roughness height, respectively. Consistently, for the same roughness, APG decreases the integrated streamwise turbulent kinetic energy. APG also decreases the roughness effect on the friction coefficient, roughness Reynolds number, and roughness shift. Compared to the ZPG boundary layers, the roughness effects on integral boundary layer parameters—boundary layer thickness and momentum thickness—are weaker under APG. Thus, contrary to the favorable pressure gradient (FPG) in part I, APG reduces the roughness effects on turbulent boundary layers.

Scaling of Favorable Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers With Eventual Relaminarization

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rau´l Bayoa´n Cal ◽  
Xia Wang ◽  
Luciano Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Velocity Profiles ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Favorable Pressure Gradient ◽  
The Mean

Applying similarity analysis to the RANS equations of motion for a pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer, Castillo and George [1] obtained the scalings for the mean deficit velocity and the Reynolds stresses. Following this analysis, Castillo and George studied favorable pressure gradient (FPG) turbulent boundary layers. They were able to obtain a single curve for FPG flows when scaling the mean deficit velocity profiles. In this study, FPG turbulent boundary layers are analyzed as well as relaminarized boundary layers subjected to an even stronger FPG. It is found that the mean deficit velocity profiles diminish when scaled using the Castillo and George [1] scaling, U∞, and the Zagarola and Smits [2] scaling, U∞δ*/δ. In addition, Reynolds stress data has been analyzed and it is found that the relaminarized boundary layer data decreases drastically in all components of the Reynolds stresses. Furthermore, it will be shown that the shape of the profile for the wall-normal and Reynolds shear stress components change drastically given the relaminarized state. Therefore, the mean velocity deficit profiles as well as Reynolds stresses are found to be necessary in order to understand not only FPG flows, but also relaminarized boundary layers.

The structure of a highly decelerated axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer

2021 ◽  
Vol 929 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Agastya Balantrapu ◽  
Christopher Hickling ◽  
W. Nathan Alexander ◽  
William Devenport
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Convection Velocity ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
The Mean

Experiments were performed over a body of revolution at a length-based Reynolds number of 1.9 million. While the lateral curvature parameters are moderate ( $\delta /r_s < 2, r_s^+>500$ , where $\delta$ is the boundary layer thickness and r s is the radius of curvature), the pressure gradient is increasingly adverse ( $\beta _{C} \in [5 \text {--} 18]$ where $\beta_{C}$ is Clauser’s pressure gradient parameter), representative of vehicle-relevant conditions. The mean flow in the outer regions of this fully attached boundary layer displays some properties of a free-shear layer, with the mean-velocity and turbulence intensity profiles attaining self-similarity with the ‘embedded shear layer’ scaling (Schatzman & Thomas, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 815, 2017, pp. 592–642). Spectral analysis of the streamwise turbulence revealed that, as the mean flow decelerates, the large-scale motions energize across the boundary layer, growing proportionally with the boundary layer thickness. When scaled with the shear layer parameters, the distribution of the energy in the low-frequency region is approximately self-similar, emphasizing the role of the embedded shear layer in the large-scale motions. The correlation structure of the boundary layer is discussed at length to supply information towards the development of turbulence and aeroacoustic models. One major finding is that the estimation of integral turbulence length scales from single-point measurements, via Taylor's hypothesis, requires significant corrections to the convection velocity in the inner 50 % of the boundary layer. The apparent convection velocity (estimated from the ratio of integral length scale to the time scale), is approximately 40 % greater than the local mean velocity, suggesting the turbulence is convected much faster than previously thought. Closer to the wall even higher corrections are required.

Convex Turbulent Boundary Layers With Zero and Favorable Pressure Gradients

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Schwarz ◽  
M. W. Plesniak
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Strain Rates ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Stress Profiles

A turbulent boundary layer subjected to multiple, additional strain rates, namely convex curvature coupled with streamwise pressure gradients (zero and favorable, ZPG and FPG) was investigated experimentally using laser Doppler velocimetry. The inapplicability of the universal flat-plate log-law to curved flows is discussed. However, a logarithmic region is found in the curved and accelerated turbulent boundary layer examined here. Similarity of the mean velocity and Reynolds stress profiles was achieved by 45 deg of curvature even in the presence of the strongest FPG investigated (k = 1.01 × 10−6). The Reynolds stresses were suppressed (with respect to flat plate values) due primarily to the effects of strong convex curvature (δo/R ≈ 0.10). In curved boundary layers subjected to different favorable pressure gradients, the mean velocity and normal Reynolds stress profiles collapsed in the inner region, but deviated in the outer region (y+ ≥ 100). Thus, inner scaling accounted for the impact of the extra strain rates on these profiles in the near-wall region. Combined with curvature, the FPG reduced the strength of the wake component, resulted in a greater suppression of the fluctuating velocity components and a reduction of the primary Reynolds shear stress throughout almost the entire boundary layer relative to the ZPG curved case.

History effects and near equilibrium in adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers

2017 ◽  
Vol 820 ◽  
pp. 667-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bobke ◽  
R. Vinuesa ◽  
R. Örlü ◽  
P. Schlatter
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
History Effects ◽  
Displacement Thickness ◽  
Gradient Parameter

Turbulent boundary layers under adverse pressure gradients are studied using well-resolved large-eddy simulations (LES) with the goal of assessing the influence of the streamwise pressure-gradient development. Near-equilibrium boundary layers were characterized through the Clauser pressure-gradient parameter $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$. In order to fulfil the near-equilibrium conditions, the free stream velocity was prescribed such that it followed a power-law distribution. The turbulence statistics pertaining to cases with a constant value of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ (extending up to approximately 40 boundary-layer thicknesses) were compared with cases with non-constant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ distributions at matched values of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ and friction Reynolds number $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}$. An additional case at matched Reynolds number based on displacement thickness $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}^{\ast }}$ was also considered. It was noticed that non-constant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ cases appear to approach the conditions of equivalent constant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ cases after long streamwise distances (approximately 7 boundary-layer thicknesses). The relevance of the constant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ cases lies in the fact that they define a ‘canonical’ state of the boundary layer, uniquely characterized by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ and $Re$. The investigations on the flat plate were extended to the flow around a wing section overlapping in terms of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ and $Re$. Comparisons with the flat-plate cases at matched values of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ and $Re$ revealed that the different development history of the turbulent boundary layer on the wing section leads to a less pronounced wake in the mean velocity as well as a weaker second peak in the Reynolds stresses. This is due to the weaker accumulated effect of the $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ history. Furthermore, a scaling law suggested by Kitsios et al. (Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 61, 2016, pp. 129–136), proposing the edge velocity and the displacement thickness as scaling parameters, was tested on two constant-pressure-gradient parameter cases. The mean velocity and Reynolds-stress profiles were found to be dependent on the downstream development. The present work is the first step towards assessing history effects in adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers and highlights the fact that the values of the Clauser pressure-gradient parameter and the Reynolds number are not sufficient to characterize the state of the boundary layer.

LDA Measurements on Rough Turbulent Boundary Layers Subject to Strong Favorable Pressure Gradients

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rau´l Bayoa´n Cal ◽  
Brian Brzek ◽  
Gunnar Johansson ◽  
Luciano Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Velocity Deficit ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Stress Profiles

Laser-Doppler anemometry (LDA) measurements of the mean velocity and Reynolds stresses are carried out on a rough surface favorable pressure gradient (FPG) turbulent boundary layer. These data is compared with smooth FPG turbulent boundary layer data possessing with the same strength of pressure gradient and also with rough zero pressure gradient (ZPG) data. The scales for the mean velocity deficit and Reynolds stresses are obtained through means of equilibrium similarity analysis of the RANS equations [1]. The mean velocity deficit profiles collapse, but to different curves when normalized using the free-stream velocity. The effects of the pressure gradient and roughness are clearly distinguished and separated. However, these effects are removed from the outer flow when the profiles are normalized using the Zagarola and Smits [2] scaling. It is also found that there is a clear effect of the roughness and pressure gradient on the Reynolds stresses. The Reynolds stress profiles augment due to the rough surface. Furthermore, the strength of the pressure gradient imposed of the flow changes the shape of the Reynolds stress profiles especially on the < v2 > and < uv > components. The rough surface influence is mostly noticed on the < u2 > component of the Reynolds stress, where the shape of the profiles change entirely. The boundary layer parameter δ*/δ shows the effects of the roughness and a dependence on the Reynolds number for the smooth FPG case. The pressure parameter, A, describes a development of the turbulent boundary layer and no influence of the roughness is linked with the parameter, k+. The boundary layers grow differently and depict the influence of the studied effects in their development. These measurements are the first of their nature due to the extensive number in downstream locations (12) and the combination of the studied external conditions (i.e., the strength of the pressure gradient and the surface roughness).

Structures in turbulent boundary layers subjected to adverse pressure gradients

2009 ◽  
Vol 639 ◽  
pp. 101-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOUNG-HO LEE ◽  
HYUNG JIN SUNG
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Stochastic Estimation ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Linear Stochastic Estimation ◽  
Mean Width ◽  
The Mean

The effects of adverse pressure gradients on turbulent structures were investigated by carrying out direct numerical simulations of turbulent boundary layers subjected to adverse and zero pressure gradients. The equilibrium adverse pressure gradient flows were established by using a power law free-stream distribution U∞ ~ xm. Two-point correlations of velocity fluctuations were used to show that the spanwise spacing between near-wall streaks is affected significantly by a strong adverse pressure gradient. Low-momentum regions are dominant in the middle of the boundary layer as well as in the log layer. Linear stochastic estimation was used to provide evidence for the presence of low-momentum regions and to determine their statistical properties. The mean width of such large-scale structures is closely associated with the size of the hairpin-like vortices in the outer layer. The conditionally averaged flow fields around events producing Reynolds stress show that hairpin-like vortices are the structures associated with the production of outer turbulence. The shapes of the vortices beyond the log layer were found to be similar when their length scales were normalized according to the boundary layer thickness. Estimates of the conditionally averaged velocity fields associated with the spanwise vortical motion were obtained by using linear stochastic estimation. These results confirm that the outer region of the adverse pressure gradient boundary layer is populated with streamwise-aligned vortex organizations, which are similar to those of the vortex packet model proposed by Adrian, Meinhart & Tomkins (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 422, 2000, pp. 1–54). The adverse pressure gradient augments the inclination angles of the packets and the mean streamwise spacing of the vortex heads in the packets.

Scaling of adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers

1992 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 699-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Durbin ◽  
S. E. Belcher
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Wall Layer ◽  
Small Range ◽  
Surface Shear Stress ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The Mean

An asymptotic analysis is developed for turbulent boundary layers in strong adverse pressure gradients. It is found that the boundary layer divides into three distinguishable regions: these are the wall layer, the wake layer and a transition layer. This structure has two key differences from the zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer: the wall layer is not exponentially thinner than the wake; and the wake has a large velocity deficit, and cannot be linearized. The mean velocity profile has a y½ behaviour in the overlap layer between the wall and transition regions.The analysis is done in the context of eddy viscosity closure modelling. It is found that k-ε-type models are suitable to the wall region, and have a power-law solution in the y½ layer. The outer-region scaling precludes the usual ε-equation. The Clauser, constant-viscosity model is used in that region. An asymptotic expansion of the mean flow and matching between the three regions is carried out in order to determine the relation between skin friction and pressure gradient. Numerical calculations are done for self-similar flow. It is found that the surface shear stress is a double-valued function of the pressure gradient in a small range of pressure gradients.

Pressure-gradient-dependent logarithmic laws in sink flow turbulent boundary layers

2008 ◽  
Vol 615 ◽  
pp. 445-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHIVSAI AJIT DIXIT ◽  
O. N. RAMESH
Keyword(s):  
Differential Equations ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Gradient Parameter ◽  
The Mean

Experiments were done on sink flow turbulent boundary layers over a wide range of streamwise pressure gradients in order to investigate the effects on the mean velocity profiles. Measurements revealed the existence of non-universal logarithmic laws, in both inner and defect coordinates, even when the mean velocity descriptions departed strongly from the universal logarithmic law (with universal values of the Kármán constant and the inner law intercept). Systematic dependences of slope and intercepts for inner and outer logarithmic laws on the strength of the pressure gradient were observed. A theory based on the method of matched asymptotic expansions was developed in order to explain the experimentally observed variations of log-law constants with the non-dimensional pressure gradient parameter (Δp=(ν/ρU3τ)dp/dx). Towards this end, the system of partial differential equations governing the mean flow was reduced to inner and outer ordinary differential equations in self-preserving form, valid for sink flow conditions. Asymptotic matching of the inner and outer mean velocity expansions, extended to higher orders, clearly revealed the dependence of slope and intercepts on pressure gradient in the logarithmic laws.

Turbulent Flow Near a Rough Wall

1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang-Moon Koh
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Simple Formula ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Friction Factors ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
The Mean

By introducing the equivalent roughness which is defined as the distance from the wall to where the velocity gets a certain value (u/uτ ≈ 8.5) and which can be represented by a simple function of the roughness, a simple formula to represent the mean-velocity distribution across the inner layer of a turbulent boundary layer is suggested. The suggested equation is general enough to be applicable to turbulent boundary layers over surfaces of any roughnesses covering from very smooth to completely rough surfaces. The suggested velocity profile is then used to get expressions for pipe-friction factors and skin friction coefficients. These equations are consistent with existing experimental observations and embrace well-known equations (e.g., Prandtl’s friction law for smooth pipes and Colebrook’s formula etc.) as special cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document