Kinematic Synthesis for Infinitesimally and Multiply Separated Positions Using Geometric Constraint Programming

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Schmiedeler ◽  
Barrett C. Clark ◽  
Edward C. Kinzel ◽  
Gordon R. Pennock
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Geometric Constraints ◽  
Geometric Constraint ◽  
Motion Generation ◽  
Planar Mechanisms ◽  
Kinematic Synthesis ◽  
Design Software ◽  
Aided Design

Geometric constraint programming (GCP) is an approach to synthesizing planar mechanisms in the sketching mode of commercial parametric computer-aided design software by imposing geometric constraints using the software's existing graphical user interface. GCP complements the accuracy of analytical methods with the intuition developed from graphical methods. Its applicability to motion generation, function generation, and path generation for finitely separated positions has been previously reported. By implementing existing, well-known theory, this technical brief demonstrates how GCP can be applied to kinematic synthesis for motion generation involving infinitesimally and multiply separated positions. For these cases, the graphically imposed geometric constraints alone will in general not provide a solution, so the designer must parametrically relate dimensions of entities within the graphical construction to achieve designs that automatically update when a defining parameter is altered. For three infinitesimally separated positions, the designer constructs an acceleration polygon to locate the inflection circle defined by the desired motion state. With the inflection circle in place, the designer can rapidly explore the design space using the graphical second Bobillier construction. For multiply separated position problems in which only two infinitesimally separated positions are considered, the designer constrains the instant center of the mechanism to be in the desired location. For example, four-bar linkages are designed using these techniques with three infinitesimally separated positions and two different combinations of four multiply separated positions. The ease of implementing the techniques may make synthesis for infinitesimally and multiply separated positions more accessible to mechanism designers and undergraduate students.

Kinematic Synthesis for Infinitesimally and Multiply Separated Positions Using Geometric Constraint Programming

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Schmiedeler ◽  
Barrett C. Clark ◽  
Edward C. Kinzel ◽  
Gordon R. Pennock
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Geometric Constraints ◽  
Geometric Constraint ◽  
Motion Generation ◽  
Planar Mechanisms ◽  
Kinematic Synthesis ◽  
Function Generation ◽  
Design Software ◽  
Aided Design

Geometric Constraint Programming (GCP) is an approach to synthesizing planar mechanisms in the sketching mode of commercial parametric computer-aided design software by imposing geometric constraints using the software’s existing graphical user interface. GCP complements the accuracy of analytical methods with the intuition developed from graphical methods. Its applicability to motion generation, function generation, and path generation for finitely separated positions has been previously reported. This paper demonstrates how GCP can be applied to kinematic synthesis for motion generation involving infinitesimally and multiply separated positions. For these cases, the graphically imposed geometric constraints alone will in general not provide a solution, so the designer must parametrically relate dimensions of entities within the graphical construction to achieve designs that automatically update when a defining parameter is altered. For three infinitesimally separated positions, the designer constructs an acceleration polygon to locate the inflection circle defined by the desired motion state. With the inflection circle in place, the designer can rapidly explore the design space using the graphical second Bobillier construction. For multiply separated position problems in which only two infinitesimally separated positions are considered, the designer constrains the instant center of the mechanism to be in the desired location. Example four-bar linkages are designed using these techniques with three infinitesimally separated positions and two different combinations of four multiply separated positions.

Function Generation With Finitely-Separated Precision Points Using Geometric Constraint Programming

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward C. Kinzel ◽  
James P. Schmiedeler ◽  
Gordon R. Pennock
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Linear Equations ◽  
Geometric Constraints ◽  
Geometric Constraint ◽  
Function Generation ◽  
Design Software ◽  
Aided Design ◽  
Four Bar Linkage ◽  
Non Linear Equations

This paper explains how Geometric Constraint Programming can be applied to solve function generation problems with finitely-separated positions using a number of different mechanisms. Geometric Constraint Programming uses the sketching mode of commercial parametric computer-aided design software to create kinematic diagrams whose elements are parametrically related so that when a parameter is changed, the design is modified automatically. Geometric constraints are imposed graphically through the user interface, and the numerical solvers integrated into the software solve the relevant systems of non-linear equations without the user explicitly formulating those equations. A key advantage of using Geometric Constraint Programming for function generation is that the same approach can be applied to any mechanism, so no unique algorithms are required. Furthermore, because the implementation is relatively straightforward regardless of the chosen mechanism, the designer can quickly and easily generate solutions for a large number of precision points and/or with complex mechanisms to provide a very accurate match to the desired function. Examples of function generation with a four-bar linkage, a six-bar linkage, and a seven-bar linkage illustrate the benefits of the proposed methodology.

Kinematic Synthesis for Finitely Separated Positions Using Geometric Constraint Programming

2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 1070-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward C. Kinzel ◽  
James P. Schmiedeler ◽  
Gordon R. Pennock
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Geometric Constraints ◽  
Geometric Constraint ◽  
Motion Generation ◽  
Robust Algorithms ◽  
Kinematic Synthesis ◽  
Synthesis Techniques ◽  
And Function ◽  
Accuracy And Repeatability

This paper presents an original approach to the kinematic synthesis of planar mechanisms for finitely separated positions. The technique, referred to here as geometric constraint programming, uses the sketching mode of commercial parametric computer-aided design software to create kinematic diagrams. The elements of these diagrams are parametrically related so that when a parameter is changed, the design is modified automatically. Geometric constraints are imposed graphically through a well-designed user interface, and numerical solvers integrated into the software solve the relevant systems of equations without the user explicitly formulating those equations. This allows robust algorithms for the kinematic synthesis of a wide variety of mechanisms to be “programmed” in a straightforward, intuitive manner. The results provided by geometric constraint programming exhibit the accuracy and repeatability achieved with analytical synthesis techniques, while simultaneously providing the geometric insight developed with graphical synthesis techniques. The key advantages of geometric constraint programming are that it is applicable to a broad range of kinematic synthesis problems, user friendly, and highly accessible. To demonstrate the utility of the technique, this paper applies geometric constraint programming to three examples of the kinematic synthesis of planar four-bar linkages: Motion generation for five finitely separated positions, path generation for nine finitely separated precision points, and function generation for four finitely separated positions.

Function Generation With Finitely Separated Precision Points Using Geometric Constraint Programming

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (11) ◽  
pp. 1185-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward C. Kinzel ◽  
James P. Schmiedeler ◽  
Gordon R. Pennock
Keyword(s):  
Nonlinear Equations ◽  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Parametric Design ◽  
Geometric Constraints ◽  
Geometric Constraint ◽  
Function Generation ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Design Software ◽  
Complex Mechanisms ◽  
Four Bar Linkage

This paper extends geometric constraint programming (GCP) to function generation problems involving large numbers of finitely separated precision points and complex mechanisms. In parametric design software, GCP uses the sketching mode to graphically impose geometric constraints in kinematic diagrams and the numerical solvers to solve the relevant nonlinear equations without the user explicitly formulating them. For function generation, the same approach can be applied to any mechanism, requiring no unique algorithms. Implementation is straightforward, so the designer can quickly generate solutions for a large number of precision points and/or with complex mechanisms to accurately match the function. Examples of function generation with a four-bar linkage, a Stephenson III six-bar linkage, and a seven-bar linkage with a mobility of two are presented.

Mixed Exact and Approximate Position Design of Planar Linkages via Geometric Constraint Programming (GCP) Techniques

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Mirth
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Parametric Modeling ◽  
Geometric Constraints ◽  
Geometric Constraint ◽  
Target Zones ◽  
Industry Standard ◽  
Modeling Software ◽  
Moving Points ◽  
Circular Target

The synthesis of mechanisms to reach multiple positions can often be satisfied by the specification of a combination of exact and approximate positions. Geometric Constraint Programming (GCP) uses industry standard parametric modeling software to obtain solutions to planar synthesis problems. This paper demonstrates the capability of GCP to solve problems that contain a combination of exact and approximate positions. The approximate positions are added to existing GCP design approaches by the application of geometric constraints to locate moving points on a mechanism within specified circular target zones. The target zones are used to guide the coupler point of a linkage along an approximate path between critical precision positions. The approach applies to the synthesis of both four-bar and complex linkages. In complex linkages, the target zones can be applied to multiple points on the linkage to better coordinate the motion of one or more floating links with the overall mechanism motion. The methods presented in the paper focus on the use of 2 exact positions plus 2–3 approximate positions. Examples are provided for the solution of rigid-body guidance problems for both four-bar and six-bar linkages. As with many GCP solutions, the graphical solutions presented are well within the capabilities and understanding of both undergraduate students and the practicing engineer.

scholarly journals Edge Models with the CAD Software: Creating a New Context for Mathematics in Elementary School

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicitas Pielsticker ◽  
Ingo Witzke ◽  
Amelie Vogler
Keyword(s):  
Elementary Schools ◽  
Digital Media ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Subjective Experience ◽  
Fourth Graders ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Toulmin Model ◽  
Geometric Objects ◽  
Design Software ◽  
Aided Design

AbstractDigital media have become increasingly important in recent years and can offer new possibilities for mathematics education in elementary schools. From our point of view, geometry and geometric objects seem to be suitable for the use of computer-aided design software in mathematics classes. Based on the example of Tinkercad, the use of CAD software — a new and challenging context in elementary schools — is discussed within the approach of domains of subjective experience and the Toulmin model. An empirical study examined the influence of Tinkercad on fourth-graders’ development of a model of a geometric solid and related reasoning processes in mathematics classes.

scholarly journals Comparison of Computer Extended Descriptive Geometry (CeDG) with CAD in the Modeling of Sheet Metal Patterns

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 685
Author(s):  
Manuel Prado-Velasco ◽  
Rafael Ortiz-Marín
Keyword(s):  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Parametric Modeling ◽  
Descriptive Geometry ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Forming Process ◽  
Solid Models ◽  
Design Software ◽  
Solid Edge ◽  
Aided Design

The emergence of computer-aided design (CAD) has propelled the evolution of the sheet metal engineering field. Sheet metal design software tools include parameters associated to the part’s forming process during the pattern drawing calculation. Current methods avoid the calculation of a first pattern drawing of the flattened part’s neutral surface, independent of the forming process, leading to several methodological limitations. The study evaluates the reliability of the Computer Extended Descriptive Geometry (CeDG) approach to surpass those limitations. Three study cases that cover a significative range of sheet metal systems are defined and the associated solid models and patterns’ drawings are computed through Geogebra-based CeDG and two selected CAD tools (Solid Edge 2020, LogiTRACE v14), with the aim of comparing their reliability and accuracy. Our results pointed to several methodological lacks in LogiTRACE and Solid Edge that prevented to solve properly several study cases. In opposition, the novel CeDG approach for the computer parametric modeling of 3D geometric systems overcame those limitations so that all models could be built and flattened with accuracy and without methodological limitations. As additional conclusion, the success of CeDG suggests the necessity to recover the relevance of descriptive geometry as a key core in graphic engineering.

Analysis and Processing of Index Tests Results at Double-Adjust Hydraulic Turbines with a Computer-Aided Design Software

2016 ◽  
Vol 823 ◽  
pp. 396-401
Author(s):  
Adrian Cuzmoş ◽  
Dorian Nedelcu ◽  
Constantin Viorel Câmpian ◽  
Cristian Fănică ◽  
Ana Maria Budai
Keyword(s):  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Hydraulic Turbines ◽  
Design Software ◽  
Index Tests ◽  
Aided Design

The paper presents a method developed and used by the CCHAPT researchers for the graphic plotting of the index tests results for hydraulic turbines, the comparison of the efficiency curves resulted from testing to those obtained by the model transposition [1] i.e. the determination and comparison of the existing combinatory cam with that obtained from tests.The method presented in the paper was born from the need for processing and presenting the results of index tests within the shortest delay and eliminating the errors that might occur in the results plotting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document