Limit Load Evaluation Using the mα-Tangent Multiplier in Conjunction With Elastic Modulus Adjustment Procedure

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Mahmood ◽  
R. Seshadri

In this paper, the mα-tangent multiplier is used in conjunction with the elastic modulus adjustment procedure (EMAP) for limit load determination. This technique is applied to a number of mechanical components possessing different kinematic redundancies. By specifying spatial variations in the elastic modulus, numerous sets of statically admissible and kinematically admissible stress and strain distributions are generated, and limit loads for practical components are then determined using the mα-tangent method. The procedure ensures sufficiently accurate limit loads within a reasonable number of iterations. Results are compared with the inelastic finite element results and are found to be in satisfactory agreement.

Author(s):  
R. Adibi-Asl ◽  
R. Seshadri

Cracks and flaws occur in mechanical components and structures, and can lead to catastrophic failures. Therefore, integrity assessment of components with defects is carried out. This paper describes the Elastic Modulus Adjustment Procedures (EMAP) employed herein to determine the limit load of components with cracks or crack-like flaw. On the basis of linear elastic Finite Element Analysis (FEA), by specifying spatial variations in the elastic modulus, numerous set of statically admissible and kinematically admissible distributions can be generated, to obtain lower and upper bounds limit loads. Due to the expected local plastic collapse, the reference volume concept is applied to identify the kinematically active and dead zones in the component. The Reference Volume Method is shown to yield a more accurate prediction of local limit loads. The limit load values are then compared with results obtained from inelastic finite element analysis. The procedures are applied to some practical components with cracks in order to verify their effectiveness in analyzing crack geometries. The analysis is then directed to geometries containing multiple cracks and three-dimensional defect in pressurized components.


Author(s):  
R. Seshadri ◽  
M. M. Hossain

Limit load determination of mechanical components and structures by the mα-tangent method is proposed herein. The proposed technique is a simplified method that enables rapid determination of limit loads for a general class of mechanical components and structures. The method makes use of statically admissible stress field based on a linear elastic finite element analysis to estimate the limit loads. The method is applied to a number of mechanical component configurations and the results compare well with those obtained by the corresponding elastic-plastic finite element analyses results.


Author(s):  
R. Adibi-Asl ◽  
M. M. Hossain ◽  
S. L. Mahmood ◽  
P. S. R. Gudimetla ◽  
R. Seshadri

Limit loads for pressure components are determined on the basis of a single linear elastic finite element analysis by invoking the concept of kinematically active (reference) volume in the context of the “mα-tangent” method. The resulting technique enables rapid determination of lower bound limit load for pressure components by eliminating the kinematically inactive volume. This method is applied to a number of practical components with different percentages of inactive volume. The results are compared with the corresponding inelastic finite element results, or available analytical solutions.


2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Seshadri ◽  
M. M. Hossain

Limit load determination of mechanical components and structures by the mα-tangent method is proposed herein. The proposed technique is a simplified method that enables rapid determination of limit loads for a general class of mechanical components and structures. The method makes use of statically admissible stress field based on a linear elastic finite element analysis to estimate the limit loads. The method is applied to a number of mechanical component configurations and the results compare well with those obtained by the corresponding elastic-plastic finite element analyses results.


2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Adibi-Asl ◽  
R. Seshadri

Cracks and flaws occur in mechanical components and structures, and can lead to catastrophic failures. Therefore, integrity assessment of components with defects is carried out. This paper describes the Elastic Modulus Adjustment Procedures (EMAP) employed herein to determine the limit load of components with cracks or crack-like flaw. On the basis of linear elastic Finite Element Analysis (FEA), by specifying spatial variations in the elastic modulus, numerous sets of statically admissible and kinematically admissible distributions can be generated, to obtain lower and upper bounds limit loads. Due to the expected local plastic collapse, the reference volume concept is applied to identify the kinematically active and dead zones in the component. The Reference Volume Method is shown to yield a more accurate prediction of local limit loads. The limit load values are then compared with results obtained from inelastic FEA. The procedures are applied to a practical component with crack in order to verify their effectiveness in analyzing crack geometries. The analysis is then directed to geometries containing multiple cracks and three-dimensional defect in pressurized components.


Author(s):  
Prasad Mangalaramanan

This paper demonstrates the limitations of repeated elastic finite element analyses (REFEA) based limit load determination that uses the classical lower bound theorem. The r-node method is prescribed as an alternative for obtaining better limit load estimates. Lower bound aspects pertaining to r-nodes are also discussed.


Author(s):  
Mark A. C. Neuert ◽  
Rebecca L. Austman ◽  
Cynthia E. Dunning

Compared to experimental studies using strain gauges, finite element (FE) models are not limited to strain measurements at discrete locations and can be used to examine the continuous strain and stress field throughout bone. As such, they can be a useful tool for biomechanical investigations interested in stress and strain changes as a result of multiple loading conditions, implant designs, etc. Critical to their development is the assignment of material properties.


2012 ◽  
Vol 622-623 ◽  
pp. 1140-1142
Author(s):  
Li Mei Wu ◽  
Yong Zhao Li ◽  
Yan Rong Wang ◽  
Fei Yang

Taking taper-lock Connection in Wind Turbine Spindle as research object, the paper analyzes the relativity of structural sizes and builds the parametric structural model by means of a way APDL. By using the non-liner finite element software ANSYS, the stress of taper-lock on the limit load conditions is analyzed, then contact stress and strain of the planet carrier and spindle are discussed. This is useful to the choice of assembly condition during taper-lock, planet carrier and spindle and providing theoretical data.


Author(s):  
Shunjie Li ◽  
Changyu Zhou ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Xinting Miao

The effect of bend angle on plastic limit loads of pipe bends (elbows) under in-plane opening and closing bending moment is presented using three-dimensional large strain nonlinear finite element analyses. The results show that the presence of ovality significantly leads to the stress concentration in the middle cross section, which is the critical section of pipe bends. Meanwhile the state of stress concentration is also associated with the loading modes including the in-plane opening bending moment and the closing bending moment. Then plastic limit loads of pipe bends are further studied. It is found that plastic limit loads are decreasing with the increase of bend angles. Especially the variation of plastic limit loads of small angle pipe bends (bend angle from the 0 degree to 90 degree) is larger than that of large angle pipe bends (bend angle greater than 90 degree). Based on the finite element results, the present plastic limit load solutions are not fit for the large angle pipe bends (bend angle greater than 90 degree).


2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Doo-Ho Cho ◽  
Young-Hwan Choi ◽  
Nam-Su Huh ◽  
Do-Jun Shim ◽  
Jae-Boong Choi

The plastic limit load solutions for cylinder and plate with slanted through-wall cracks (TWCs) are developed based on the systematic three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) limit analyses. As for loading conditions, axial tension, global bending, and internal pressure are considered for a cylinder with slanted circumferential TWC, whereas, axial tension and internal pressure are considered for a plate and a cylinder with slanted axial TWC. Then, the verification of FE model and analysis procedure employed in the present numerical work was confirmed by employing the existing solutions for both cylinder and plate with idealized TWC. Also, the geometric variables of slanted TWC which can affect plastic limit loads were considered. Based on the systematic FE limit analysis results, the slant correction factors which represent the effect of slanted TWC on plastic limit load were provided as tabulated solutions. By adopting these slant correction factors, the plastic limit loads of slanted TWC can be directly estimated from existing solutions for idealized TWC. Furthermore, the modified engineering estimations of plastic limit loads for slanted TWC are proposed based on equilibrium equation and von Mises yield criterion. The present results can be applied either to diverse structural integrity assessments or for accurate estimation of fracture mechanics parameters such as J-integral, plastic crack opening displacement (COD) and C*-integral for slanted TWC based on the reference stress concept (Kim, et al., 2002, “Plastic Limit Pressure for Cracked Pipes Using Finite Element Limit Analyse,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 79, pp. 321–330; Kim, et al., 2001, “Enhanced Reference Stress-Based J and Crack Opening Displacement Estimation Method for Leak-Before-Break Analysis and Comparison With GE/EPRI Method,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 24, pp. 243–254; Kim, et al., 2002, “Non-Linear Fracture Mechanics Analyses of Part Circumferential Surface Cracked Pipes,” Int. J. Fract., 116, pp. 347–375.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document