A Model-Free Feature-Based Bi-Planar RSA Method for Kinematic Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Amiri ◽  
Carolyn Anglin ◽  
Kenard Agbanlog ◽  
Bassam A. Masri ◽  
David R. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Kinematic Analysis ◽  
3D Models ◽  
Cement Interface ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Feature Based ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Fluoroscopic imaging is commonly used for assessing relative motions of orthopaedic implants. One limiting factor to in vivo model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of total knee arthroplasty is the need for 3D models of the implants.The 3D models of the implant components must be reverse-engineered, if not provided by the company, which makes this method impractical for a clinical study involving many types or sizes of implants. This study introduces a novel feature-based methodology that registers the features at the implant-bone or implant-cement interface of the components that have elementary shapes. These features include pegs with hemispherical heads, and straight, circular or curved edges located on flat faces of the box of the femoral component or the stem geometry of the tibial component. Software was developed to allow easy registration of these features through a graphical user interface. The accuracy and precision of registration for multiple flexion angles from 0 to 120 deg was determined with reference to registered poses of the implants through experiments on bone replica models and also on a cadaver specimen implanted with total knee prostheses. When compared to an equivalent bi-planar model-based registration, the results were comparable: The mean accuracy of this feature-based method was 1.45 deg and 1.03 mm (in comparison to 0.95 deg and 1.32 mm for the model-based approach), and the mean precision was 0.57 deg and 0.26 mm (in comparison to 0.42 deg and 0.44 mm for the model-based approach).The methodology and the developed software can easily accommodate different design of implants with various fixation features. This method can facilitate in vivo kinematic analysis of total knee arthroplasty by eliminating the need for 3D models of the implant components.

scholarly journals In Vivo Kinematic Analysis of Bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Focused on Function of the ACL

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosei Ishigaki ◽  
Hideyuki Aoki ◽  
Ryo Takamatsu ◽  
Yuji Nishiwaki ◽  
Hiroshi Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Kinematic Analysis ◽  
Tibial Component ◽  
Lateral Translation ◽  
In Vivo Kinetics ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Bcr Tka

Abstract Background: The utility of a bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) is uncertain. In this study, we performed an in vivo kinematic analysis of squat motion on level ground and on a downward slope in patients treated with BCR-TKA to examine the value of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) preservation.Methods: The subjects were ten valgus knees that underwent TKA (BCR: 5 knees, CR: 5 knees) at our hospital. We evaluated in vivo kinematics of the knee using fluoroscopy and investigated the femoral component translation relative to the tibial component from extension to maximum flexion, and the rotation angle between the components under the two conditions. Statistical analysis was conducted by Mann-Whitney U test to compare the rotational angle, the location of lateral and medial contact points per flexion angle. Differences in these parameters between the BCR and CR groups across the flexion angles were compared by repeated measures ANOVA.Results: Rotation of the femoral component to the tibial component occurred gradually as flexion continued. On level ground, lateral rotation at 0° to 120° flexion was 14.5±1.95° in the BCR group and 7.9±0.47° in the CR group. Medial translation was 4.1±1.73mm in the BCR group and 2.5±1.64mm in the CR group, and lateral translation was 13.2±1.6mm in the BCR group and 7.1±1.74mm in the CR group. On a forward slope, lateral rotation was 12.7±1.45° in the BCR group and 7.57±0.47° in the CR group. Medial translation was 5.87±1.78mm in the BCR and 2.9±0.81mm in the CR, and lateral translation was 13.6±1.84mm in the BCR and 7.4±0.96mm in the CR.Conclusion: An in vivo kinetics analysis of deep flexion motion was conducted on level ground and on a forward slope to stress the ACL. Under both conditions, kinetics close to screw home movement were found in the BCR group and rotation was significantly larger than that in the CR group. The medial contact point between components was located significantly more anterior in the BCR group. In conclusion, BCR-TKA was found to have in vivo kinetics close to those of a normal knee, in comparison with CR-TKA.

In vivo kinematic analysis of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for the valgus knee operated by the gap-balancing technique

The Knee ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1124-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Suzuki ◽  
Noriyuki Hara ◽  
Susumu Mikami ◽  
Tetsuya Tomita ◽  
Keiji Iwamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Kinematic Analysis ◽  
Valgus Knee ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Gap Balancing ◽  
Total Knee

In Vivo Kinematic Analysis of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty During Weight-Bearing and Non–Weight-Bearing Deep Knee Bending

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1196-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Horiuchi ◽  
Shaw Akizuki ◽  
Tetsuya Tomita ◽  
Kazuomi Sugamoto ◽  
Takaharu Yamazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Kinematic Analysis ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Cruciate Retaining ◽  
Total Knee

In Vivo Kinematic Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Four Different Polyethylene Designs

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Wada ◽  
Hiroshi Tatsuo ◽  
Hideo Kawahara ◽  
Mitsuhiko Sato ◽  
Hisatoshi Baba
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Kinematic Analysis ◽  
Total Knee

In vivo wear measurement in a modern total knee arthroplasty with model-based radiostereometric analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (11) ◽  
pp. 1348-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Gascoyne ◽  
Sara Parashin ◽  
Matthew Teeter ◽  
Eric Bohm ◽  
Elise Laende ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Linear Wear ◽  
Volumetric Wear ◽  
Radiostereometric Analysis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Total Knee

Aims A retrospective study was conducted to measure short-term in vivo linear and volumetric wear of polyethylene (PE) inserts in 101 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients using model-based radiostereometric analysis (MBRSA). Patients and Methods Nonweightbearing supine RSA exams were performed postoperatively and at six, 12, and 24 months. Weightbearing standing RSA exams were performed on select patients at 12 and 24 months. Wear was measured both linearly (joint space) and volumetrically (digital model overlap) at each available follow-up. Precision of both methods was assessed by comparing double RSA exams. Patient age, sex, body mass index, and Oxford Knee Scores were analyzed for any association with PE wear. Results Linear wear occurred at 0.015 mm/year (supine) and 0.220 mm/year (standing). Volumetric wear occurred at 10.3 mm3/year (supine) and 39.3 mm3/year (standing). Wear occurred primarily on the medial side of the joint. Weightbearing imaging greatly improved the reliability of measurement. Clinical precision of volumetric wear was 34 mm3. No significant associations were found between patient demographics or function scores and measured wear. Conclusion In vivo volumetric wear of TKAs can be assessed at short-term follow-up using MBRSA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1348–1355.

scholarly journals FRI0418 SELECTIVE PATELLAR RESURFACING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIC KNEE: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 807.3-807
Author(s):  
I. Moriyama
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patellofemoral Joint ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Patellar Resurfacing ◽  
Criterion A ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Background:No widely accepted view or criteria currently exist concerning whether or not patellar replacement (resurfacing) should accompany total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee.1)2)3)Objectives:We recently devised our own criteria for application of patellar replacement and performed selective patellar replacement in accordance with this set of criteria. The clinical outcome was analyzed.Methods:The study involved 1150 knees on which total knee arthroplasty was performed between 2005 and 2019 because of osteoarthritis of the knee. The mean age at operation was 73, and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 91 months. Our criteria for application of patellar replacement are given below. Criterion A pertains to evaluation of preoperative clinical symptoms related to the patellofemoral joint: (a) interview regarding presence/absence of pain around the patella, (b) cracking or pain heard or felt when standing up from a low chair, (c) pain when going upstairs/downstairs. Because it is difficult for individual patients to identify the origin of pain (patellofemoral joint or femorotibial joint), the examiner advised each patient about the location of the patellofemoral joint when checking for these symptoms. Criterion B pertains to intense narrowing or disappearance of the patellofemoral joint space on preoperative X-ray of the knee. Criterion C pertains to the intraoperatively assessed extent of patellar cartilage degeneration corresponding to class 4 of the Outerbridge classification. Patellar replacement was applied to cases satisfying at least one of these sets of criteria (A-a,-b,-c, B and C). Postoperatively, pain of the patellofemoral joint was evaluated again at the time of the last observation, using Criterion A-a,-b,-c.Results:Patellar replacement was applied to 110 knees in accordance with the criteria mentioned above. There were 82 knees satisfying at least one of the Criterion sets A-a,-b,-c, 39 knees satisfying Criterion B and 70 knees satisfying Criterion C. (Some knees satisfied 2 or 3 of Criteria A, B and C).When the pain originating from patellofemoral joint (Criterion A) was clinically assessed at the time of last observation, pain was not seen in any knee of the replacement group and the non-replacement group.Conclusion:Whether or not patellar replacement is needed should be determined on the basis of the symptoms or findings related to the patellofemoral joint, and we see no necessity of patellar replacement in cases free of such symptoms/findings. When surgery was performed in accordance with the criteria on patellar replacement as devised by us, the clinical outcome of the operated patellofemoral joint was favorable, although the follow-up period was not long. Although further follow-up is needed, the results obtained indicate that selective patellar replacement yields favorable outcome if applied to cases judged indicated with appropriate criteria.References:[1]The Effect of Surgeon Preference for Selective Patellar Resurfacing on Revision Risk in Total Knee Replacement: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of 136,116 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.Vertullo CJ, Graves SE, Cuthbert AR, Lewis PL J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 17;101(14):1261-1270[2]Resurfaced versus Non-Resurfaced Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Allen W1, Eichinger J, Friedman R. Indian J Orthop. 2018 Jul-Aug;52(4):393-398.[3]Is Selectively Not Resurfacing the Patella an Acceptable Practice in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?Maradit-Kremers H, Haque OJ, Kremers WK, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1143-1147.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Home physiotherapy with vs. without supervision of physiotherapist for assessing manipulation under anaesthesia after total knee arthroplasty

Arthroplasty ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe ◽  
Ravi Vinod Shah ◽  
Amit Pankaj Doshi ◽  
Shubhankar Sanjay Londhe ◽  
Kavita Subhedar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Forgotten Joint Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Manipulation Under Anaesthesia ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Discharge From Hospital

Abstract The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare home physiotherapy with or without supervision of physiotherapist for assessing manipulation under anaesthesia after total knee arthroplasty. Methods A total of 900 patients (including 810 females and 90 males) who had undergone total knee arthroplasty were divided into group A (n = 300) and group B (n = 600). Patients in group A had home physiotherapy on their own after discharge from hospital. The physiotherapist did not visit them at home. Patients in group B received home physiotherapy under supervision of physiotherapist for 6 weeks after discharge from hospital. Patients’ age, range of motion of the knee, and forgotten joint score-12 were assessed. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In group A, the mean age was 69.1 ± 14.3 years (range: 58 to 82 years); in group B, the mean age was 66.5 ± 15.7 years (range: 56 to 83 years) (p > 0.05). Preoperatively, the mean range of motion of the knee in group A and B was 95.8° ± 18.1° and 95.4° ± 17.8°, respectively (p > 0.05). The mean forgotten joint score-12 of group A and B were 11.90 ± 11.3 and 11.72 ± 12.1 (p > 0.05), respectively. Six weeks after total knee arthroplasty, the mean ROM of the knee in group A and B was 109.7° ± 22.3° and 121° ± 21.5°, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean postoperative forgotten joint score-12 of the group A and B was 24.5 ± 16.4 and 25.6 ± 17.4, respectively (p > 0.05). The rate of manipulation under anaesthesia was 3% in group A and 0.2% in group B (p < 0.05). Conclusion After total knee arthroplasty, frequent physiotherapist’s instruction helps the patients improve knee exercises and therefore decrease the risk of revision surgery. The home physiotherapy under supervision of physiotherapist lowers the rate of manipulation under anaesthesia. Level of evidence Therapeutic study, Level IIa.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document