Closure to “Discussions of ‘The Effects of External Pressure on Thin-Shell Pressure Vessel Heads’” (1962, ASME J. Eng. Ind., 84, pp. 216–219)

1962 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-219
Author(s):  
Edward O. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Thin Shell ◽  
External Pressure

The Effects of External Pressure on Thin-Shell Pressure Vessel Heads

1962 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward O. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Thin Shell ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
The Other ◽  
Thin Wall

This paper is concerned primarily with the effects of external pressure on thin-wall torispherical, toriconical, and ellipsoidal pressure vessel heads including the determination of the collapse pressures. Two test vessels, one having torispherical and 120-deg toriconical heads and the other having ellipsoidal and 90-deg toriconical heads, were used in the study. Longitudinal and circumferential stresses per psi external pressure were plotted for the regions at which the vessel heads had been welded to the cylindrical portions of the vessels. Deflection values were plotted for the torispherical and ellipsoidal heads. Both the stress values and deflection values were determined from experimental data.

Analysis of Half-Pipe Heating Channels on Pressure Vessel Shells

1986 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-529
Author(s):  
A. E. Blach
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Numerical Examples ◽  
Asme Code

Half-pipe heating channels are used on the outside of pressure vessels such as agitators, mixers, reactors, etc., to avoid the high external pressure associated with heating jackets. No applicable method of analysis is contained in the ASME Code and proof tests are normally required for registration with governing authorities. An analytical method is presented which permits the evaluation of stresses in shell and half pipe; numerical examples are included.

A Study of the Conservatism in ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 2 Opening Design for External Pressure

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Millet ◽  
Kaveh Ebrahimi ◽  
James Lu ◽  
Kenneth Kirkpatrick ◽  
Bryan Mosher
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Internal Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
The Other ◽  
Finite Element Analyses ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Allowable Compressive Stress ◽  
Division 2

Abstract In the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, nozzle reinforcement rules for nozzles attached to shells under external pressure differ from the rules for internal pressure. ASME BPVC Section I, Section VIII Division 1 and Section VIII Division 2 (Pre-2007 Edition) reinforcement rules for external pressure are less stringent than those for internal pressure. The reinforcement rules for external pressure published since the 2007 Edition of ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 2 are more stringent than those for internal pressure. The previous rule only required reinforcement for external pressure to be one-half of the reinforcement required for internal pressure. In the current BPVC Code the required reinforcement is inversely proportional to the allowable compressive stress for the shell under external pressure. Therefore as the allowable drops, the required reinforcement increases. Understandably, the rules for external pressure differ in these two Divisions, but the amount of required reinforcement can be significantly larger. This paper will examine the possible conservatism in the current Division 2 rules as compared to the other Divisions of the BPVC Code and the EN 13445-3. The paper will review the background of each method and provide finite element analyses of several selected nozzles and geometries.

Remaining Life Assessment of an External Pressure Vessel in Creep Range and Inspection Findings

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Ishizaki ◽  
Futoshi Yonekawa ◽  
Takeaki Yumoto ◽  
Teppei Suzuki ◽  
Shuji Hijikawa
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Creep Damage ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Remaining Life ◽  
Assessment Technique ◽  
Creep Cavity ◽  
Creep Analysis ◽  
Remaining Life Assessment

As widely recognized in the industry, it is important to evaluate the creep damage of an elevated temperature vessel so that the mechanical integrity of the vessel can be achieved through the adequate repair and replacement planning. This is quite straight forward procedure for internal pressure vessels. For an external pressure vessel, it is not easy to assess the creep damage due to the complexity of the creep buckling analysis. Eventually, creep cavity evaluation technique without identifying the correct stress distribution has been used so often. However, due to the uncertainty of the technique itself plus conservative mindset of the inspectors, it tends to leads to an excessive maintenance most of the cases. In order to conduct a reasonable remaining life assessment, it is desirable to use the creep cavity inspection in conjunction with another assessment technique such as FEM creep analysis as stated in API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 10.5.7. In this paper, comprehensive approach with FEM and field inspection such as creep cavity evaluation to reinforce the uncertainty of each method will be demonstrated.

Thin-Shell Pressure Vessel Theoretical and Experimental Stresses

1963 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-200
Author(s):  
Edward O. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Investigation ◽  
Cylindrical Shell ◽  
Theoretical Analysis ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Thin Shell

This paper is concerned primarily with a comparison of experimental and theoretical shell-to-head junction stresses of a thin-shell pressure vessel. The portion of the vessel with which this investigation was concerned was the region at the junction of a two-to-one ellipsoidal head and a cylindrical shell. Both a discussion of the theoretical analysis and a description of the experimental investigation are included in the paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document