The Laminar Boundary Layer on a Rotating Circular Arc Blade

1966 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
R. M. Halleen ◽  
J. P. Johnston ◽  
W. C. Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer ◽  
Perturbation Technique ◽  
Approximate Solutions ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Centrifugal Impeller ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Boundary Layer Problem ◽  
Rotating Blade

The primary objective was to develop an exact solution to the simplest possible laminar boundary-layer problem for a curved rotating blade. It was formulated initially so that the results might be used to illuminate some of the characteristics of boundary-layer behavior on centrifugal impeller blades. The solution was obtained by a perturbation technique and the results compared to existing approximate solutions and related exact solutions. A primary result shows that rotation itself may induce laminar boundary-layer separation on a blade trailing face in the absence of free-stream, longitudinal adverse pressure gradients. This result is then interpreted to show that such a separation may become important for impellers of low ReD = uˆtD/ν; i.e., when ReD ≤ 900.

An Accurate Calculation Method for Two-dimensional Incompressible Laminar Boundary Layers, Including Cases with Regions of Sharp Pressure Gradient

1977 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Curle
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Calculation Method ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Accurate Calculation ◽  
Boundary Layer Equations ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layers ◽  
Displacement Thickness ◽  
Type Boundary

SummaryThe paper develops and extends the calculation method of Stratford, for flows in which a Blasius type boundary layer reacts to a sharp unfavourable pressure gradient. Whereas even the more general of Stratford’s two formulae for predicting the position of boundary-layer separation is based primarily upon an interpolation between only three exact solutions of the boundary layer equations, the present proposals are based upon nine solutions covering a much wider range of conditions. Four of the solutions are for extremely sharp pressure gradients of the type studied by Stratford, and five are for more modest gradients. The method predicts the position of separation extremely accurately for each of these cases.The method may also be used to predict the detailed distributions of skin friction, displacement thickness and momentum thickness, and does so both simply and accurately.

The Effects of Small Changes of Prandtl Number and the Viscosity-Temperature Index on Skin Friction

1964 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Young
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Prandtl Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Main Stream ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Temperature Index

SummaryThe analytic simplifications in boundary-layer analysis that result from the assumptions that the Prandtl number σ and the viscosity-temperature index ω are unity make it desirable to be able to assess the effects of the departures of the actual values of these parameters from unity. In this paper only the effects on skin friction are considered. Formulae of acceptable validity and wide application are first used to produce generalised curves for these effects for given main-stream Mach numbers and wall temperature conditions for the case of zero external pressure gradient for both laminar and turbulent boundary layers (Figs. 1 and 2).A number of calculated results for the laminar boundary layer with favourable and adverse pressure gradients is then analysed (Figs. 3, 4 and 5) and it is shown that these results are consistent with the assumption that, for a given wall temperature, the effects of small changes of σ and ω on skin friction are independent of the external gradient, so that the appropriate curves of Figs. 1 and 2 apply. Where the change of a- is associated with a change of wall temperature (e.g. if the heat transfer is specified as zero) then the interaction between pressure gradient and this temperature change can be significant in its effects on skin friction for the laminar boundary layer and can only be assessed if the effects of changes of wall temperature with constant σ and ω have been separately determined for the pressure distribution considered. It is inferred that in all cases, except with large adverse pressure gradients and imminent separation, the effects of changes of ω and σ for the turbulent boundary layer are reliably predicted by the zero pressure gradient curves of Figs. 1 and 2 and the effect of any associated change of wall temperature can then be reliably inferred from the zero pressure gradient formula (equation (15)) in the absence of more specific calculations covering a range of wall temperatures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document