Effect of Small Hub-Radius Change on Bending Frequencies of a Rotating Beam

1960 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 548-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsu Lo ◽  
J. E. Goldberg ◽  
J. L. Bogdanoff

By the method of perturbation, a simple relation is formulated for the determination of the change of bending frequencies of a rotating beam due to a small change of hub radius. The first-order solution shows that a frequency parameter γ is a linear function of the hub-radius change and the constant of proportionality is readily obtainable from known parameters. The frequency ω itself can also be represented by a linear function of the hub-radius change. This confirms the results previously obtained by Boyce by repeated solutions of the differential equations for a particular beam. Higher-order solutions are also established and shown to be convergent within the limitation imposed on the amount of the hub-radius change allowable.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zamani Nejad ◽  
Mehdi Jabbari ◽  
Mehdi Ghannad

Using disk form multilayers, a semi-analytical solution has been derived for determination of displacements and stresses in a rotating cylindrical shell with variable thickness under uniform pressure. The thick cylinder is divided into disk form layers form with their thickness corresponding to the thickness of the cylinder. Due to the existence of shear stress in the thick cylindrical shell with variable thickness, the equations governing disk layers are obtained based on first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT). These equations are in the form of a set of general differential equations. Given that the cylinder is divided intondisks,nsets of differential equations are obtained. The solution of this set of equations, applying the boundary conditions and continuity conditions between the layers, yields displacements and stresses. A numerical solution using finite element method (FEM) is also presented and good agreement was found.


1834 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 247-308 ◽  

The theoretical development of the laws of motion of bodies is a problem of such interest and importance, that it has engaged the attention of all the most eminent mathematicians, since the invention of dynamics as a mathematical science by Galileo, and especially since the wonderful extension which was given to that science by Newton. Among the successors of those illustrious men, Lagrange has perhaps done more than any other analyst, to give extent and harmony to such deductive researches, by showing that the most varied consequences respecting the motions of systems of bodies may be derived from one radical formula; the beauty of the method so suiting the dignity of the results, as to make of his great work a kind of scientific poem. But the science of force, or of power acting by law in space and time, has undergone already another revolution, and has become already more dynamic, by having almost dismissed the conceptions of solidity and cohesion, and those other material ties, or geometrically imaginable conditions, which Lagrange so happily reasoned on, and by tending more and more to resolve all connexions and actions of bodies into attractions and repulsions of points: and while the science is advancing thus in one direction by the improvement of physical views, it may advance in another direction also by the invention of mathematical methods. And the method proposed in the present essay, for the deductive study of the motions of attracting or repelling systems, will perhaps be received with indulgence, as an attempt to assist in carrying forward so high an inquiry. In the methods commonly employed, the determination of the motion of a free point in space, under the influence of accelerating forces, depends on the integration of three equations in ordinary differentials of the second order; and the determination of the motions of a system of free points, attracting or repelling one another, depends on the integration of a system of such equations, in number threefold the number of the attracting or repelling points, unless we previously diminish by unity this latter number, by considering only relative motions. Thus, in the solar system, when we consider only the mutual attractions of the sun and of the ten known planets, the determination of the motions of the latter about the former is reduced, by the usual methods, to the integration of a system of thirty ordinary differential equations of the second order, between the coordinates and the time; or, by a transformation of Lagrange, to the integration of a system of sixty ordinary differential equations of the first order, between the time and the elliptic elements: by which integrations, the thirty varying coordinates, or the sixty varying elements, are to be found as functions of the time. In the method of the present essay, this problem is reduced to the search and differentiation of a single function, which satisfies two partial differential equations of the first order and of the second degree: and every other dynamical problem, respecting the motions of any system, however numerous, of attracting or repelling points, (even if we suppose those points restricted by any conditions of connexion consistent with the law of living force,) is reduced, in like manner, to the study of one central function, of which the form marks out and characterizes the properties of the moving system, and is to be determined by a pair of partial differential equations of the first order, combined with some simple considerations. The difficulty is therefore at least transferred from the integration of many equations of one class to the integration of two of another: and even if it should be thought that no practical facility is gained, yet an intellectual pleasure may result from the reduction of the most complex and, probably., of all researches respecting the forces and motions of body, to the study of one characteristic function, the unfolding of one central relation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Bin Suleiman ◽  
Zarina Bibi Binti Ibrahim ◽  
Ahmad Fadly Nurullah Bin Rasedee

The current numerical technique for solving a system of higher-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs) is to reduce it to a system of first-order equations then solving it using first-order ODE methods. Here, we propose a method to solve higher-order ODEs directly. The formulae will be derived in terms of backward difference in a constant stepsize formulation. The method developed will be validated by solving some higher-order ODEs directly with constant stepsize. To simplify the evaluations of the integration coefficients, we find the relationship between various orders. The result presented confirmed our hypothesis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-300
Author(s):  
J. DZURINA ◽  
◽  
B. BACULIKOVA ◽  

In the paper we offer oscillation criteria for even-order neutral differential equations, where z(t) = x(t) + p(t)x(τ(t)). Establishing a generalization of Philos and Staikos lemma, we introduce new comparison principles for reducing the examination of the properties of the higher order differential equation onto oscillation of the first order delay differential equations. The results obtained are easily verifiable.


Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama Moaaz ◽  
Shigeru Furuichi ◽  
Ali Muhib

In this work, we present a new technique for the oscillatory properties of solutions of higher-order differential equations. We set new sufficient criteria for oscillation via comparison with higher-order differential inequalities. Moreover, we use the comparison with first-order differential equations. Finally, we provide an example to illustrate the importance of the results.


Author(s):  
Rainer Pfaff

SynopsisWe consider ordinary linear differential systems of first order with distributional coefficients and distributional nonhomogeneous terms. Firstly the coefficients are assumed to be functions, secondly to be first order distributions (i.e. first derivatives of functions which are integrable or of bounded variation), and thirdly to be distributions of higher order.


1984 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-96
Author(s):  
Lee A. Rubel

We confine ourselves, for simplicity, to first-order algebraic differential equations (ADE's), although analogous considerations may be made for higher-order ADE's:P(x, y(x), y'(x)) = 0. (*)A motion of (*) is a change of independent variable that takes solutions to solutions, that is, a suitable map <p of the underlying interval I into itself so that if y is a solution of (*) then y ° φ is a solution of (*), i.e.


1989 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiji Nishioka

In his famous lectures [7] Painlevé investigates general solutions of algebraic differential equations which depend algebraically on some of arbitrary constants. Although his discussions are beyond our understanding, the rigorous and accurate interpretation to make his intuition true would be possible. Successful accomplishments have been done by some authors, for example, Kimura [1], Umemura [8, 9]. From differential algebraic viewpoint in [5] the author introduces the notion of rational dependence on arbitrary constants of general solutions of algebraic differential equations, and in [6] clarifies the relation between it and the notion of strong normality. Here we aim at generalizing to higher order case the result in [4] that in the first order case solutions of equations depend algebraically on those of equations free from moving singularities which are determined uniquely as the closest ones to the given. Part of our result can be seen in [7].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document