scholarly journals Closure to “Discussion of ‘Pool Boiling on Polished and Chemically Etched Stainless-Steel Surfaces’” (1968, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 90, p. 238)

1968 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-238
Author(s):  
R. I. Vachon ◽  
G. E. Tanger ◽  
D. L. Davis ◽  
G. H. Nix
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Steel Surfaces

Comparison of Gas Nucleation and Pool Boiling Site Densities

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusen Qi ◽  
James F. Klausner
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Nucleation Site ◽  
Nucleation Theory ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
General Validity ◽  
Site Density ◽  
Steel Surfaces ◽  
Nucleation Site Density

It has been well established that the rate of heat transfer associated with boiling systems is strongly dependent on the nucleation site density. Over many years attempts have been made to predict nucleation site density in boiling systems using a variety of techniques. With the exception of specially prepared surfaces, these attempts have met with little success. This paper presents an experimental investigation of nucleation site density measured on roughly polished brass and stainless steel surfaces for gas nucleation and pool boiling over a large parameter space. The fluids used for this study, distilled water and ethanol, are moderately wetting and highly wetting, respectively. Using distilled water it has been observed that the trends of nucleation site density versus the inverse of the critical radius are similar for pool boiling and gas nucleation. The nucleation site density is higher for gas nucleation than for pool boiling. An unexpected result has been observed with ethanol as the heat transfer fluid, which casts doubt on the general validity of heterogeneous nucleation theory. Due to flooding, few sites are active on the brass surface and at most two are active on the stainless steel surface during gas nucleation experiments. However, nucleation sites readily form in large concentration on both the brass and stainless steel surfaces during pool boiling. The nucleation site densities for the rough and mirror polished brass surfaces are also compared. It shows that there is no large difference for the measured nucleation site density.

Comparison of Nucleation Site Density for Pool Boiling and Gas Nucleation

2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusen Qi ◽  
James F. Klausner
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Nucleation Site ◽  
Stainless Steel Surface ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Site Density ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Steel Surfaces ◽  
Nucleation Site Density

It has been well established that the rate of heat transfer associated with boiling systems is strongly dependent on the nucleation site density. Over many years attempts have been made to predict nucleation site density in boiling systems using a variety of techniques. With the exception of specially prepared surfaces, these attempts have met with little success. This paper presents an experimental investigation of nucleation site density measured on roughly polished brass and stainless steel surfaces for gas nucleation and pool boiling over a large parameter space. A statistical model used to predict the nucleation site density in saturated pool boiling is also investigated. The fluids used for this study, distilled water and ethanol, are moderately wetting and highly wetting, respectively. Using distilled water it has been observed that the trends of nucleation site density versus the inverse of the critical radius are similar for pool boiling and gas nucleation. The nucleation site density is higher for gas nucleation than for pool boiling. An unexpected result has been observed with ethanol as the heat transfer fluid, which casts doubt on the general assumption that heterogeneous nucleation in boiling systems is exclusively seeded by vapor trapping cavities. Due to flooding, few sites are active on the brass surface and at most two are active on the stainless steel surface during gas nucleation experiments. However, nucleation sites readily form in large concentration on both the brass and stainless steel surfaces during pool boiling. The pool boiling nucleation site densities for ethanol on rough and mirror polished brass surfaces are also compared. It shows that there is not a significant difference between the measured nucleation site densities on the smooth and rough surfaces. These results suggest that, in addition to vapor trapping cavities, another mechanism must exist to seed vapor bubble growth in boiling systems.

Pool Boiling on Polished and Chemically Etched Stainless-Steel Surfaces

1968 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. I. Vachon ◽  
G. E. Tanger ◽  
D. L. Davis ◽  
G. H. Nix
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Atmospheric Pressure ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
304 Stainless Steel ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Preparation Technique ◽  
Nucleation Sites ◽  
Steel Surfaces

This paper presents pool boiling data at atmospheric pressure for mechanically polished and chemically etched 304 stainless-steel surfaces in contact with distilled water. The surfaces were prepared by these techniques to produce variation in nucleation sites. Surface roughness was varied from 2–61 rms. The results show the changes in heat transfer with varying rms surface roughness and preparation technique. The Rohsenow pool boiling correlation was used to discuss the data.

Pool boiling performance of oxide nanofluid on a downward-facing heating surface

Kerntechnik ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhibo Zhang ◽  
Huai-En Hsieh ◽  
Yuan Gao ◽  
Shiqi Wang ◽  
Jia Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Heating Surface ◽  
Nano Particles

Abstract In this study, the pool boiling performance of oxide nanofluid was investigated, the heating surface is a 5 × 30 mm stainless steel heating surface. Three kinds of nanofluids were selected to explore their critical heat flux (CHF) and heat transfer coefficient (HTC), which were TiO2, SiO2, Al2O3. We observed that these nanofluids enhanced CHF compared to R·O water, and Al2O3 case has the most significant enhancement (up to 66.7%), furthermore, the HTC was also enhanced. The number of bubbles in nanofluid case was relatively less than that in R·O water case, but the bubbles were much larger. The heating surface was characterized and it was found that there were nano-particles deposited, and surface roughness decreased. The wettability also decreased with the increase in CHF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document