Closure to “Discussion of ‘Heat-to-Heat Variation in Creep Properties of Types 304 and 316 Stainless Steels’” (1976, ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 98, pp. 85–86)

1976 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-87
Author(s):  
V. K. Sikka ◽  
H. E. McCoy ◽  
M. K. Booker ◽  
C. R. Brinkman
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Creep Properties

Use of Duplex Stainless Steel in Economic Design of a Pressure Vessel

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milan Veljkovic ◽  
Jonas Gozzi
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Duplex Stainless Steel ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Design Procedure ◽  
High Strength Steels ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Economic Design ◽  
European Standard

Pressure vessels have been used for a long time in various applications in oil, chemical, nuclear, and power industries. Although high-strength steels have been available in the last three decades, there are still some provisions in design codes that preclude a full exploitation of its properties. This was recognized by the European Equipment Industry and an initiative to improve economy and safe use of high-strength steels in the pressure vessel design was expressed in the evaluation report (Szusdziara, S., and McAllista, S., EPERC Report No. (97)005, Nov. 11, 1997). Duplex stainless steel (DSS) has a mixed structure which consists of ferrite and austenite stainless steels, with austenite between 40% and 60%. The current version of the European standard for unfired pressure vessels EN 13445:2002 contains an innovative design procedure based on Finite Element Analysis (FEA), called Design by Analysis-Direct Route (DBA-DR). According to EN 13445:2002 duplex stainless steels should be designed as a ferritic stainless steels. Such statement seems to penalize the DSS grades for the use in unfired pressure vessels (Bocquet, P., and Hukelmann, F., 2001, EPERC Bulletin, No. 5). The aim of this paper is to present an investigation performed by Luleå University of Technology within the ECOPRESS project (2000-2003) (http://www.ecopress.org), indicating possibilities towards economic design of pressure vessels made of the EN 1.4462, designation according to the European standard EN 10088-1 Stainless steels. The results show that FEA with von Mises yield criterion and isotropic hardening describe the material behaviour with a good agreement compared to tests and that 5% principal strain limit is too low and 12% is more appropriate.

Development of a Fatigue Design Curve for Austenitic Stainless Steels in LWR Environments: A Review

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omesh K. Chopra
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Type Strain ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steels ◽  
Environmental Parameters ◽  
Light Water Reactor ◽  
Code Design ◽  
Fatigue Design ◽  
Asme Code

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code provides rules for the construction of nuclear power plant components and specifies fatigue design curves for structural materials. However, the effects of light water reactor (LWR) coolant environments are not explicitly addressed by the Code design curves. Existing fatigue strain–vs.–life (ε–N) data illustrate potentially significant effects of LWR coolant environments on the fatigue resistance of pressure vessel and piping steels. This paper reviews the existing fatigue ε–N data for austenitic stainless steels in LWR coolant environments. The effects of key material, loading, and environmental parameters, such as steel type, strain amplitude, strain rate, temperature, dissolved oxygen level in water, and flow rate, on the fatigue lives of these steels are summarized. Statistical models are presented for estimating the fatigue ε–N curves for austenitic stainless steels as a function of the material, loading, and environmental parameters. Two methods for incorporating environmental effects into the ASME Code fatigue evaluations are presented. Data available in the literature have been reviewed to evaluate the conservatism in the existing ASME Code fatigue design curves.

Development of New Material Testing Apparatus in High-Pressure Hydrogen and Evaluation of Hydrogen Gas Embrittlement of Metals

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Fukuyama ◽  
Masaaki Imade ◽  
Kiyoshi Yokogawa
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steels ◽  
Material Testing ◽  
Hydrogen Gas ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Fuel Cell Vehicle ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Pressure Hydrogen

A new type of apparatus for material testing in high-pressure gas of up to 100 MPa was developed. The apparatus consists of a pressure vessel and a high-pressure control system that applies the controlled pressure to the pressure vessel. A piston is installed inside a cylinder in the pressure vessel, and a specimen is connected to the lower part of the piston. The load is caused by the pressure difference between the upper room and the lower room separated by the piston, which can be controlled to a loading mode by the pressure valves of the high-pressure system supplying gas to the vessel. Hydrogen gas embrittlement (HGE) and internal reversible hydrogen embrittlement (IRHE) of austenitic stainless steels and iron- and nickel-based superalloys used for high-pressure hydrogen storage of fuel cell vehicle were evaluated by conducting tensile tests in 70 MPa hydrogen. Although the HGE of these metals depended on modified Ni equivalent, the IRHE did not. The HGE of austenitic stainless steels was larger than their IRHE; however, the HGE of superalloys was not always larger than their IRHE. The effects of the chemical composition and metallic structure of these materials on the HGE and IRHE were discussed. The HGE of austenitic stainless steels was examined in 105 MPa hydrogen. The following were identified; SUS304: HGE in stage II, solution-annealed SUS316: HGE in stage III, sensitized SUS316: HGE in stage II, SUS316L: HGE in FS, SUS316LN: HGE in stage III and SUS310S: no HGE.

Contributions of Dr. Sumio Yukawa in the Development of Non-Ductile Failure Prevention Rules in the ASME Code

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hardayal S. Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Elevated Temperature ◽  
Carbon Steel ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nickel Alloys ◽  
Ductile Failure ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steels ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Asme Code

The objective of this paper is to review and highlight the contributions of Dr. Sumio Yukawa in the development of rules for the prevention of non-ductile failure in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. This includes review of his role in the development of WRC-175, Appendix G of Section III, the development of early flaw evaluation rules for carbon steel piping and in the review and evaluation of the toughness of austenitic stainless steels and nickel alloys after long-term elevated temperature exposures. The current status of these activities is briefly described.

Selection of Metal Electrodes for and Effect of Welding Treatment on Hardness and Microstructure of Some Type of Austenitic Stainless Steels

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Ibrahim ◽  
H. G. Mohamed ◽  
Y. E. Tawfik
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Plate Thickness ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steels ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Aisi 304L ◽  
Stress Relieving ◽  
Selection Of

Austenitic stainless steels have been the focus of considerable research recently because of their high strength, good ductility, excellent corrosion resistance and a reasonable weldability. These properties make austenitic stainless steels attractive candidate materials for use in the fabrication of piping systems, automotive exhaust gas systems and in a variety of equipment associated with the chemical and nuclear power industries. PWHT is a stress relieving process whereby residual stresses are reduced by typically heating to 550–650 °C for a set time depending upon plate thickness. The effect of PWHT on mechanical properties such as hardness, ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, impact energy and ductile to brittle transition temperature are of great concern to the pressure vessel industry and pressure vessel codes. This paper reports on the effect of multiple PWHT on hardness and microstructure of austenitic stainless steels. The 6 mm AISI 304L, 316L, and 347 austenitic stainless steels were used for this work. This welds were produced by SMAW and GTAW techniques using a single vee preparation and multiple weld beads, and welded by various types of consumables. Selection of a suitable consumables metals for joining those weldment sample joints are an important criterion in view of the differences in physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of the base materials involved.

Effect of Hot Corrosion on the Creep Properties of Types 321 and 347 Stainless Steels

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.G. González-Rodríguez ◽  
A. Luna-Ramírez ◽  
A. Martínez-Villafañe
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Hot Corrosion ◽  
Creep Properties

Research and Application on Mechanical Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steels for Cold Stretched Pressure Vessel

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Han ◽  
Xuedong Chen ◽  
Quankun Liu
Keyword(s):  
Yield Strength ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steels ◽  
Small Strain ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Minor Effect ◽  
Static Conditions

Austenitic stainless steels (ASS) have good ductility and toughness but low yield strength. In order to save material and realize lightweight of pressure vessels, the cold stretching technology can be used to enhance ASS’s yield strength. Based on the control of different strain, the material parameters of strength, ductility and volume fraction of strain-induced martensite (SIM) were obtained. The results show that cold stretching can significantly improve ASS’s yield strength and have minor effect on material’s plasticity and content of SIM. The ASS still maintain enough plastic margin after cold stretching and thus can substantially reduce the wall thickness of vessel. In the quasi-static conditions, the mechanical parameters are not sensitive to strain rate. However, too small strain rate will lead to occurrence of serrated yielding, which is called Portevin-Le Chatelier (PLC) effect. The conclusions for the cold stretching in pressure vessel provide theoretic basis reference for engineering applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document