Strongly Anisotropic Rough Surfaces

1979 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Bush ◽  
R. D. Gibson ◽  
G. P. Keogh
Keyword(s):  
Random Process ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Plasticity Index ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Elastic Contact ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Real Contact

The statistics of a strongly anisotropic rough surface are briefly described. The elastic contact of rough surfaces is treated by approximating the summits of a random process model by parabolic ellipsoids and applying the Hertzian solution for their deformation. Load and real contact area are derived as functions of the separation and for all separations the load is found to be approximately proportional to the contact area. The limits of elastic/plastic contact are discussed in terms of the plasticity index.

Unloading Process in Elastic-Plastic Contact of a Rough Surface With a Flat

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sepehri ◽  
K. Farhang
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Force ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Integral Form ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Approximate Equations

Three dimensional elastic-plastic contact of a nominally flat rough surface and a flat is considered. The asperity level Finite Element based constitutive equations relating contact force and real contact area to the interference is used. The statistical summation of asperity interaction during unloading phase is derived in integral form. Approximate equations are found that describe in closed form contact load as a function of mean plane separation during unloading. The approximate equations provide accuracy to within 6 percent for the unload phase of the contact force.

scholarly journals Measurement of Real Contact Area for Rough Metal Surfaces and the Distinction of Contribution From Elasticity and Plasticity

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei-Tao Li ◽  
Xuan-Ming Liang ◽  
Yu-Zhe Xing ◽  
Duo Yan ◽  
Gang-Feng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Normal Load ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
The Real ◽  
Physical Mechanisms ◽  
Frustrated Total Internal Reflection ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
New Apparatus ◽  
Elastic And Plastic Deformation

Abstract The measurement of the real contact area between rough surfaces is one of the most challenging problems in contact mechanics and is of importance to understand some physical mechanisms in tribology. Based on the frustrated total internal reflection, a new apparatus is designed to measure the real contact area. For metallic samples with various surface topographies, the relation between normal load and the real contact area is measured. The unloading process is first considered to distinguish the contribution of elasticity and plasticity in contact with rough surfaces. It is found that both elasticity and plasticity are involved throughout the continuous loading process, different from some present understanding and assumptions that they play at different loading stages. A quantitative parameter is proposed to indicate the contribution of plasticity. The present work not only provides an experimental method to measure the real contact area but figures out how elastic and plastic deformation works in contact with rough surfaces.

Influence of the in-plan distribution of asperities on the normal contact of periodically rough surfaces

2016 ◽  
Vol 230 (9) ◽  
pp. 1382-1391
Author(s):  
K Houanoh ◽  
H-P Yin ◽  
J Cesbron ◽  
Q-C He
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulations ◽  
Half Space ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Elastic Half Space ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Normal Contact ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Full Contact ◽  
Rigid Surfaces

The present work aims to analyze the influence of the in-plan distribution of asperities on the contact between periodically rough surfaces. Square pattern and hexagonal pattern rigid surfaces are considered. Their contact with an elastic half-space is analyzed by numerical simulations. Three surfaces are generated with identical asperities periodically distributed in a plan according to different patterns. It follows from numerical results that when the load and the real contact area are small, the asperities act almost independently. However, the interaction between close asperities increases with the load becomes intensified and has a significant effect on the contact area when the situation is close to full contact.

Deterministic Contact Model of a Rough Surface Against a Flat-Layered Surface

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Pasaribu ◽  
D. J. Schipper
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Indentation Depth ◽  
Normal Load ◽  
Contact Model ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Single Asperity ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Effective Mechanical Properties

The effective mechanical properties of a layered surface vary as a function of indentation depth and the values of these properties range between the value of the layer itself and of the substrate. In this paper, a layered surface is modelled like a solid that has effective mechanical properties as a function of indentation depth by assuming that the layer is perfectly bounded to the substrate. The normal load as a function of indentation depth of sphere pressed against a flat layered surface is calculated using this model and is in agreement with the experimental results published by El-Sherbiney (1975), El-Shafei et al. (1983), Tang & Arnell (1999) and Michler & Blank (2001). A deterministic contact model of a rough surface against a flat layered surface is developed by representing a rough surface as an array of spherically shaped asperities with different radii and heights (not necessarily Gaussian distributed). Once the data of radius and height of every single asperity is obtained, one can calculate the number of asperities in contact, the real contact area and the load carried by the asperities as a function of the separation.

Plane Contact and Partial Slip Behaviors of Elastic Layers With Randomly Rough Surfaces

2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Jin ◽  
Qiang Wan ◽  
Xu Guo
Keyword(s):  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Elastic Layer ◽  
Partial Slip ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Rigid Base ◽  
Slip Model ◽  
Normal Contact ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Plane Contact

A plane contact and partial slip model of an elastic layer with randomly rough surface were established by combining the Greenwood–Williamson (GW) rough contact model and the Cattaneo–Mindlin partial slip model. The rough surface of the elastic layer bonded to a rigid base is modeled as an ensemble of noninteracting asperities with identical radius of curvature and Gaussian-distributed heights. By employing the Hertzian solution and the Cattaneo–Mindlin solution to each individual asperity of the rough surface, we derive the total normal force, the real contact area, and the total tangential force for the rough surface, respectively, and then examine the normal contact and partial slip behaviors of the layer. An effective Coulomb coefficient is defined to account for interfacial friction properties. Furthermore, a typical stick–slip transition for the rough surface was also captured by distinguishing the stick and slip contacting asperities according to their respective indentation depths. Our analysis results show that an increasing layer thickness may result in a larger real contact area, a lower mean contact pressure, and a higher effective Coulomb coefficient.

Finite Element Analysis on Real Contact Area Based on Fractal Characterization

2013 ◽  
Vol 579-580 ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Chun Wang ◽  
Bo Qiang Xing ◽  
Teng Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Smooth Surface ◽  
Thermal Conductance ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Real Contact

No surface in engineering is absolutely smooth. It is important to analyze and calculate the real contact area for a better understanding of friction, wear, lubrication and thermal conductance. To obtain the accurate real contact area between rough surface and smooth surface, a rough-non-rigid-smooth surface contact finite element model is proposed in which the rough surface is characterized by fracture theory. In finite element modeling and analyzing process, MATLABEXCEL and AutoCAD are used to process data, and the smooth surface is considered to be non-rigid body. Compared with the traditional modeling, this method can obtain data quickly and is closer to the actual situation.

scholarly journals Mechanics Analysis of Rough Surface Based on Shoulder-Shoulder Contact

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (17) ◽  
pp. 8048
Author(s):  
Qiuping Yu ◽  
Jianjun Sun ◽  
Zhengbo Ji
Keyword(s):  
Rough Surface ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Rough Surfaces ◽  
Geometric Model ◽  
Mechanical Analysis ◽  
Real Contact Area ◽  
Mechanics Model ◽  
Porosity Reduction ◽  
Fractal Roughness ◽  
Fractal Characteristics

Proper methods and models for mechanical analysis of rough surface can improve the theory of surface contact. When the topography parameters of two rough surfaces are similar, the contact should be considered shoulder-shoulder rather than top-top. Based on shoulder-shoulder contact and fractal characteristics, the geometric model for asperity and contact mechanics model for rough surfaces are established, and the deformation of asperity, the real contact area and contact load of sealing surface are discussed. The effects of contact pressure p and topography parameters (fractal dimension D and fractal roughness G) on the variation of porosity and contact area ratio Ar/A0 are achieved. Results show that with the increase of p, larger D and smaller G corresponds to larger initial porosity but faster and larger decrease of porosity; with the increment of D, porosity increases first and then decreases, and smaller G corresponds to larger porosity reduction; as G becomes bigger, porosity increases, and larger D corresponds to larger porosity difference and change. With the addition of p, Ar/A0 increases, and the variation of Ar/A0 is closer to linearity and less at smaller D and larger G; with the increase of D, Ar/A0 increases gradually, and the growth rate is bigger at smaller G and bigger p; as G becomes bigger, Ar/A0 declines, and it declines more gently at smaller D and p. The influence of D on Ar/A0 is greater than that of G. The results can provide the theoretical basis for the design of sealing surfaces and the research of sealing or lubrication technologies of rough surfaces.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document