AbstractThe anterior body of many fishes is shaped like an airfoil turned on its side. With an oscillating angle to the swimming direction, such an airfoil experiences negative pressure due to both its shape and pitching movements. This negative pressure acts as thrust forces on the anterior body. Here, we apply a high-resolution, pressure-based approach to describe how two fishes, bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill), swimming in the carangiform mode, the most common fish swimming mode, generate thrust on their anterior bodies using leading-edge suction mechanics, much like an airfoil. These mechanics contrast with those previously reported in lampreys – anguilliform swimmers – which produce thrust with negative pressure but do so through undulatory mechanics. The thrust produced on the anterior body of these carangiform swimmers through negative pressure comprises 28% of the total thrust produced over the body and caudal fin, substantially decreasing the net drag on the anterior body. On the posterior region, subtle differences in body shape and kinematics allow trout to produce more thrust than bluegill, suggesting that they may swim more effectively. Despite the large phylogenetic distance between these species, and differences near the tail, the pressure profiles around the anterior body are similar. We suggest that such airfoil-like mechanics are highly efficient, because they require very little movement and therefore relatively little active muscular energy, and may be used by a wide range of fishes since many species have appropriately-shaped bodies.Significance StatementMany fishes have bodies shaped like a low-drag airfoil, with a rounded leading edge and a smoothly tapered trailing region, and move like an airfoil pitching at a small angle. This shape reduces drag but its significance for thrust production by fishes has not been investigated experimentally. By quantifying body surface pressures and forces during swimming, we find that the anterior body shape and movement allows fishes to produce thrust in the same way as an oscillating airfoil. This work helps us to understand how the streamlined body shape of fishes contributes, not only to reducing drag, but also directly to propulsion, and, by quantitatively linking form and function, leads to a more complete understanding fish evolution and ecology.
The fish body functions as an airfoil: surface pressures generate thrust during carangiform locomotion