scholarly journals Discussion: “Quasi-Three-Dimensional Laminar Boundary-Layer Separations in Supersonic Flow” (Vatsa, V. N., and Werle, M. J., 1977, ASME J. Fluids Eng., 99, pp. 634–638)

1977 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-639
Author(s):  
Gary D. Kuhn
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Supersonic Flow ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer ◽  
Three Dimensional

Measurement of Recovery Factors and Friction Coefficients for Supersonic Flow of Air in a Tube: 2—Results Based on a Two-Dimensional Flow Model for Entrance Region

1952 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-194
Author(s):  
J. Kaye ◽  
T. Y. Toong ◽  
R. H. Shoulberg
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Supersonic Flow ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Variable Mass ◽  
Entrance Region ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Flow ◽  
Change Of State ◽  
Two Dimensional Flow

Abstract The first part of a program to obtain reliable data on the rate of heat transfer to air moving at supersonic speeds in a tube has been devoted to measurements made on adiabatic supersonic flow of air in a tube. The details of these measurements have been described in a previous paper. The calculated quantities such as the local apparent friction coefficient, recovery factor, Mach number, and so forth, were obtained from the simple one-dimensional flow model for which the properties of the stream are uniform at any section, and boundary-layer effects are ignored. The analysis of some of the same data given in the previous paper is undertaken here with the aid of a simplified two-dimensional flow model. The supersonic flow in the tube is divided into a supersonic core of variable mass with the fluid remaining in the core undergoing a reversible adiabatic change of state, and a laminar boundary layer of variable mass. The compressible laminar boundary layer increases in thickness in the direction of flow, and then undergoes a transition to a turbulent boundary layer. The two-dimensional flow model is limited here to the region where a laminar boundary layer appears to be present in the entrance region of the tube. The results of the analysis based on the two-dimensional flow model indicate that where the flow in the tube boundary layer appears to be laminar, the measured pressures and temperatures in the tube for adiabatic supersonic flow of air could have been predicted, with sufficient accuracy for engineering problems, from measured data for supersonic flow of air over a flat plate with a laminar boundary layer, and with zero pressure gradient.

scholarly journals Receptivity of a laminar boundary layer to the interaction of a three-dimensional roughness element with time-harmonic free-stream disturbances

1992 ◽  
Vol 242 ◽  
pp. 701-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tadjfar ◽  
R. J. Bodonyi
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer ◽  
Stokes Flow ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Flow Direction ◽  
Roughness Element ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Unsteady Motion ◽  
Time Harmonic ◽  
Tollmien Schlichting

Receptivity of a laminar boundary layer to the interaction of time-harmonic free-stream disturbances with a three-dimensional roughness element is studied. The three-dimensional nonlinear triple–deck equations are solved numerically to provide the basic steady-state motion. At high Reynolds numbers, the governing equations for the unsteady motion are the unsteady linearized three-dimensional triple-deck equations. These equations can only be solved numerically. In the absence of any roughness element, the free-stream disturbances, to the first order, produce the classical Stokes flow, in the thin Stokes layer near the wall (on the order of our lower deck). However, with the introduction of a small three-dimensional roughness element, the interaction between the hump and the Stokes flow introduces a spectrum of all spatial disturbances inside the boundary layer. For supercritical values of the scaled Strouhal number, S0 > 2, these Tollmien–Schlichting waves are amplified in a wedge-shaped region, 15° to 18° to the basic-flow direction, extending downstream of the hump. The amplification rate approaches a value slightly higher than that of two-dimensional Tollmien–Schlichting waves, as calculated by the linearized analysis, far downstream of the roughness element.

scholarly journals Experimental observation of frequency lock-in of roughness-induced instabilities in a laminar boundary layer

2019 ◽  
Vol 870 ◽  
pp. 680-697
Author(s):  
Dominik K. Puckert ◽  
Ulrich Rist
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Aspect Ratio ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer ◽  
Roughness Element ◽  
Water Channel ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Boundary Layer Theory ◽  
Linear Stability Theory ◽  
Mode Decomposition ◽  
Lock In

The interaction of disturbance modes behind an isolated cylindrical roughness element in a laminar boundary layer is investigated by means of hot-film anemometry and particle image velocimetry in a low-turbulence laminar water channel. Both sinuous and varicose disturbance modes are found in the wake of a roughness with unit aspect ratio (diameter/height $=$ 1). Interestingly, the frequency of the varicose mode synchronizes with the first harmonic of the sinuous mode when the critical Reynolds number from three-dimensional global linear stability theory is exceeded. The coupled motion of sinuous and varicose modes is explained by frequency lock-in. This mechanism is of great importance in many aspects of nature, but has not yet received sufficient attention in the field of boundary-layer theory. A Fourier mode decomposition provides detailed analyses of sinuous and varicose modes. The observation is confirmed by a second experiment with the same aspect ratio at a different position in the laminar boundary layer. When the aspect ratio is increased, the flow is fully governed by the varicose mode. Thus, no frequency lock-in can be observed in this case. The significance of this work is to explain how sinuous and varicose modes can co-exist behind a roughness and to propose a mechanism which is well established in physics but not encountered often in boundary-layer theory.

The influence of the nonuniformity supersonic flow on the laminar boundary layer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. I. Vishnyakov ◽  
P. A. Polivanov ◽  
A. D. Budovsky ◽  
A. A. Sidorenko
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Supersonic Flow ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer

Some Effects of Injection of Foreign Gases in a Decelerating Laminar Boundary Layer in Supersonic Flow

1962 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1250-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. WILLIAM GOUSE ◽  
GEORGE A. BROWN ◽  
JOSEPH KAYE
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Supersonic Flow ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document