Closure to “Discussion of ‘Effect of Specimen Thickness on Crack Growth Behavior in Alloy 718 Under Creep and Fatigue Conditions’” (1979, ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 101, p. 176)

1979 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Sadananda ◽  
P. Shahinian
Keyword(s):  
Crack Growth ◽  
Growth Behavior ◽  
Crack Growth Behavior ◽  
Specimen Thickness ◽  
Alloy 718

The Assessment of Residual Stress Effects on Ductile Tearing Using Continuum Damage Mechanics

2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Sherry ◽  
Mark A. Wilkes ◽  
John K. Sharples ◽  
Peter J. Budden
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Damage Mechanics ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Growth Behavior ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Crack Growth Behavior ◽  
Specimen Thickness ◽  
Good Prediction ◽  
Ductile Tearing

This paper presents the results of a numerical study undertaken to assess the influence of residual stresses on the ductile tearing behavior of a high strength low toughness aluminum alloy. The Gurson–Tvergaard model was calibrated against conventional fracture toughness data using parameters relating to void nucleation, growth, and coalescence. The calibrated model was used to predict the load versus ductile tearing behavior of a series of full-scale and quarter-scale wide-plate tests. These center-cracked tension tests included specimens that contained a self-balancing residual stress field that was tensile in the region of the through-wall crack. Analyses of the full-scale wide-plate tests indicated that the model provides a good prediction of the load versus the ductile tearing behavior up to approximately 3mm of stable tearing. The influence of residual stress on the load versus the crack growth behavior was accurately simulated. Predictions of the load versus the crack growth behavior of full-scale wide-plate tests for crack extensions greater than 3mm and of the quarter-scale tests were low in terms of predicted load at a given amount of tearing. This was considered to result from (i) the “valid” calibration range in terms of specimen thickness and crack extension, (ii) the development of shear lips, and (iii) the differences in the micromechanism of ductile void formation under plane strain and under plane stress conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document