Vector Bond Graphs Applied to One-Dimensional Distributed Systems

1975 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. S. Bonderson
Keyword(s):  
Distributed Systems ◽  
Bond Graph ◽  
Bond Graphs ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Lumped Models ◽  
Multiple Power

Vector bond graph notation and conventions are presented which simplify the task of representing the multiple power bonds, transformations and junction structures of multiport systems. These ideas are shown to be particularly convenient in the reticulation of represntative microelements for a class of one-dimensional multipower distributed systems. The microelements are an aid in understanding the dynamics of distributed systems and may be used to construct approximate lumped models.

System Properties of One-Dimensional Distributed Systems

1977 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. S. Bonderson
Keyword(s):  
Distributed Systems ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
State Variables ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
First Order ◽  
Lumped Element ◽  
Order Form ◽  
Power Product ◽  
System Properties ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

The system properties of passivity, losslessness, and reciprocity are defined and their necessary and sufficient conditions are derived for a class of linear one-dimensional multipower distributed systems. The utilization of power product pairs as state variables and the representation of the dynamics in first-order form allows results completely analogous to those for lumped-element systems.

Bond Graph Sign Conventions

1975 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Perelson
Keyword(s):  
Graph Model ◽  
Bond Graph ◽  
Equivalence Classes ◽  
Parameter System ◽  
Bond Graphs ◽  
Lumped Parameter ◽  
Oriented Object

The lack of arbitrariness in the choice of bond graph sign conventions is established. It is shown that an unoriented bond graph may have no unique meaning and that with certain choices of orientation a bond graph may not correspond to any lumped parameter system constructed from the same set of elements. Network interpretations of these two facts are given. Defining a bond graph as an oriented object leads to the consideration of equivalence classes of oriented bond graphs which represent the same system. It is also shown that only changes in the orientation of bonds connecting 0-junctions and 1-junctions can lead to changes in the observable properties of a bond graph model.

scholarly journals Analysing and simulating energy-based models in biology using BondGraphTools

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Cudmore ◽  
Michael Pan ◽  
Peter J. Gawthrop ◽  
Edmund J. Crampin
Keyword(s):  
Systems Biology ◽  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Bond Graph ◽  
Experimental Measurements ◽  
Bond Graphs ◽  
Graph Models ◽  
Conservation Of Energy ◽  
Conservation Of Mass ◽  
Physical Systems ◽  
Complex Interactions

AbstractLike all physical systems, biological systems are constrained by the laws of physics. However, mathematical models of biochemistry frequently neglect the conservation of energy, leading to unrealistic behaviour. Energy-based models that are consistent with conservation of mass, charge and energy have the potential to aid the understanding of complex interactions between biological components, and are becoming easier to develop with recent advances in experimental measurements and databases. In this paper, we motivate the use of bond graphs (a modelling tool from engineering) for energy-based modelling and introduce, BondGraphTools, a Python library for constructing and analysing bond graph models. We use examples from biochemistry to illustrate how BondGraphTools can be used to automate model construction in systems biology while maintaining consistency with the laws of physics.

scholarly journals Meeting the multiscale challenge: representing physiology processes over ApiNATOMY circuits using bond graphs

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 20170026 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. de Bono ◽  
S. Safaei ◽  
P. Grenon ◽  
P. Hunter
Keyword(s):  
Bond Graph ◽  
Bond Graphs ◽  
Acid Base ◽  
Distinct Process ◽  
Biophysical Processes ◽  
Biological Structures

We introduce, and provide examples of, the application of the bond graph formalism to explicitly represent biophysical processes between and within modular biological compartments in ApiNATOMY. In particular, we focus on modelling scenarios from acid–base physiology to link distinct process modalities as bond graphs over an ApiNATOMY circuit of multiscale compartments. The embedding of bond graphs onto ApiNATOMY compartments provides a semantically and mathematically explicit basis for the coherent representation, integration and visualisation of multiscale physiology processes together with the compartmental topology of those biological structures that convey these processes.

Some Key Issues in Using Bond Graphs and Genetic Programming for Mechatronic System Design

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Rosenberg ◽  
E. D. Goodman ◽  
Kisung Seo
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Programming ◽  
System Design ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Bond Graph ◽  
Mechatronic System ◽  
Bond Graphs ◽  
Mechatronic Systems ◽  
Energy Behavior ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Bond Graph Modeling

Abstract Mechatronic system design differs from design of single-domain systems, such as electronic circuits, mechanisms, and fluid power systems, in part because of the need to integrate the several distinct domain characteristics in predicting system behavior. The goal of our work is to develop an automated procedure that can explore mechatronic design space in a topologically open-ended manner, yet still find appropriate configurations efficiently enough to be useful. Our approach combines bond graphs for model representation with genetic programming for generating suitable design candidates as a means of exploring the design space. Bond graphs allow us to capture the common energy behavior underlying the several physical domains of mechatronic systems in a uniform notation. Genetic programming is an effective way to generate design candidates in an open-ended, but statistically structured, manner. Our initial goal is to identify the key issues in merging the bond graph modeling tool with genetic programming for searching. The first design problem we chose is that of finding a model that has a specified set of eigenvalues. The problem can be studied using a restricted set of bond graph elements to represent suitable topologies. We present the initial results of our studies and identify key issues in advancing the approach toward becoming an effective and efficient open-ended design tool for mechatronic systems.

Demonstrating the Generation of Bond Graphs From 3D Assemblies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey J. Alicchio ◽  
Justin S. Vitiello ◽  
Pradeep Radhakrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Bond Graph ◽  
Dynamic Responses ◽  
Bond Graphs ◽  
Mechatronic Systems ◽  
3D Cad ◽  
Related Information ◽  
Grammar Rules ◽  
Gear Trains ◽  
System Graph ◽  
Future Work

Abstract The bond graph method provides a generic and simple way to compute differential equations and dynamic responses for complex mechatronic systems. This paper will illustrate the process of automatically generating bond graphs from 3D CAD assemblies of gear-trains. Using appropriate CAD application programming interfaces (APIs), information on parts and mates within an existing assembly is extracted. The extracted information is stored as an identity graph, which also stores all geometry and mass related information of every part. Grammar rules are then used to transform the identity graph to a system graph, which is then converted to bond graph using an existing bond graph generation program. The paper will discuss the process, challenges and planned future work.

Open Systems Formulation and Gaining Insight Using Lagrangian Bond Graphs

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin C. Redfield
Keyword(s):  
System Dynamics ◽  
Open Systems ◽  
Classical Method ◽  
System Modeling ◽  
Bond Graph ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Bond Graphs ◽  
Model Modification ◽  
System Equations ◽  
Insight Into

Abstract Models of a small-scale water rocket are developed as an example of open system modeling by both the bond graph approach and a more classical method. One goal of the development is to determine the benefits of the bond graph approach into affording insight into the system dynamics. Both modeling approaches yield equivalent differential equations as they should, while the bond graph approach yields significantly more insight into the system dynamics. If a modeling goal is to simply find the system equations and predict behavior, the classical approach may be more expeditious. If insight and ease of model modification are desired, the bond graph technique is probably the better choice. But then you have to learn it!

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document