Automated Analysis of Constrained Systems of Rigid and Flexible Bodies

1985 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Shabana
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Mass Matrix ◽  
Ritz Method ◽  
Rigid Body Motion ◽  
Constrained Systems ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Lumped Mass ◽  
Flexible Bodies ◽  
Inertia Properties

This paper is concerned with modeling inertia properties of flexible components that undergo large angular rotations. Consistent, lumped and hybrid mass techniques are presented in detail and used to model the inertia properties of flexible bodies. The consistent formulation allows using the finite-element method as well as Rayleigh-Ritz method to describe the deformation of elastic components. Lumped mass techniques allow using shape vectors or experimentally identified data. In the hybrid mass formulation, the flexibility mass matrix is evaluated using a consistent mass formulation, while the inertia coupling between gross rigid body motion and elastic deformation is formulated using a lumped mass technique. Different mass formulations require the evaluation of similar sets of time-invariant matrices that represent the inertia coupling. Consequently, these matrices have to be evaluated only once in advance for the dynamic analysis. A unified mathematical model, and accordingly a unified computer program (DAMS: Dynamic Analysis of Multibody Systems), that deal with different formulations are developed. A comparative study is presented in order to study the effect of the mass formulation on the dynamic response of elastodynamic constrained systems. The validity of the linear theory that neglects the effect of small oscillations on large rigid body motion is also discussed.

A Generalized Component Mode Synthesis Approach for Multibody System Dynamics Leading to Constant Mass and Stiffness Matrices

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Gerstmayr ◽  
Astrid Pechstein
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Mass Matrix ◽  
Rigid Body Motion ◽  
Component Mode Synthesis ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Mode Shapes ◽  
Relative Deformation ◽  
Constant Mass ◽  
Constant Matrix ◽  
Flexible Deformation

A standard technique to reduce the system size of flexible multibody systems is the component mode synthesis. Selected mode shapes are used to approximate the flexible deformation of each single body numerically. Conventionally, the (small) flexible deformation is added relatively to a body-local reference frame, which results in the floating frame of reference formulation (FFRF). The coupling between large rigid body motion and small relative deformation is nonlinear, which leads to computationally expensive non-constant mass matrices and quadratic velocity vectors. In the present work, the total (absolute) displacements are directly approximated by means of mode shapes, without a splitting into rigid body motion and superimposed flexible deformation. As the main advantage of the proposed method, the mass matrix is constant, the quadratic velocity vector vanishes and the stiffness matrix is a co-rotated constant matrix. Numerical experiments show the equivalence of the proposed method to the FFRF approach.

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of a Structure Subjected to Multiple Support Motions

1981 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. N. Shah ◽  
A. J. Hartmann
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Nonlinear Dynamic ◽  
Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Rigid Body Motion ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Superposition Method ◽  
Modal Superposition ◽  
Modal Superposition Method ◽  
Multiple Support

A modal superposition method for the nonlinear dynamic analysis of a structure subjected to multiple support motions is presented. The nonlinearities are due to clearances between the components and their supports. The finite element method is used to derive the equations of motion with the nonlinearities represented by a pseudo force vector. The displacement response may be divided into two parts: elastic deformation and rigid body motion. The presence of rigid body motion necessitates the inclusion of the higher modes in the transient analysis. The modal superposition method is used to analyze the dynamic response of one loop of the nuclear steam supply system. This loop has nonlinear supports and is subjected to nonuniform seismic excitations at the supports. It is shown that the computational cost of the modal superposition method is lower than that of the direct integration.

A Generalized Component Mode Synthesis Approach for Flexible Multibody Systems With a Constant Mass Matrix

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Pechstein ◽  
Daniel Reischl ◽  
Johannes Gerstmayr
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Multibody Systems ◽  
Mass Matrix ◽  
Rigid Body Motion ◽  
Flexible Multibody Systems ◽  
Component Mode Synthesis ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Mode Shapes ◽  
Flexible Multibody ◽  
Flexible Deformation

A standard technique to reduce the system size of flexible multibody systems is the component mode synthesis. Selected mode shapes are used to approximate the flexible deformation of each single body numerically. Conventionally, the (small) flexible deformation is added relatively to a body-local reference frame which results in the floating frame of reference formulation (FFRF). The coupling between large rigid body motion and small relative deformation is nonlinear, which leads to computationally expensive nonconstant mass matrices and quadratic velocity vectors. In the present work, the total (absolute) displacements are directly approximated by means of global (inertial) mode shapes, without a splitting into rigid body motion and superimposed flexible deformation. As the main advantage of the proposed method, the mass matrix is constant, the quadratic velocity vector vanishes, and the stiffness matrix is a co-rotated constant matrix. Numerical experiments show the equivalence of the proposed method to the FFRF approach.

A planar reconfigurable linear rigid-body motion linkage with two operation modes

2014 ◽  
Vol 228 (16) ◽  
pp. 2985-2991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangbo Hao ◽  
Xianwen Kong ◽  
Xiuyun He
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Single Mode ◽  
Rigid Body Motion ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Reference Guide ◽  
Revolute Joints ◽  
Operation Modes ◽  
Straight Line ◽  
Motion Stage ◽  
Motion Mode

A planar reconfigurable linear (also rectilinear) rigid-body motion linkage (RLRBML) with two operation modes, that is, linear rigid-body motion mode and lockup mode, is presented using only R (revolute) joints. The RLRBML does not require disassembly and external intervention to implement multi-task requirements. It is created via combining a Robert’s linkage and a double parallelogram linkage (with equal lengths of rocker links) arranged in parallel, which can convert a limited circular motion to a linear rigid-body motion without any reference guide way. This linear rigid-body motion is achieved since the double parallelogram linkage can guarantee the translation of the motion stage, and Robert’s linkage ensures the approximate straight line motion of its pivot joint connecting to the double parallelogram linkage. This novel RLRBML is under the linear rigid-body motion mode if the four rocker links in the double parallelogram linkage are not parallel. The motion stage is in the lockup mode if all of the four rocker links in the double parallelogram linkage are kept parallel in a tilted position (but the inner/outer two rocker links are still parallel). In the lockup mode, the motion stage of the RLRBML is prohibited from moving even under power off, but the double parallelogram linkage is still moveable for its own rotation application. It is noted that further RLRBMLs can be obtained from the above RLRBML by replacing Robert’s linkage with any other straight line motion linkage (such as Watt’s linkage). Additionally, a compact RLRBML and two single-mode linear rigid-body motion linkages are presented.

Computation of Nonlinear Response of Hydraulically Actuated Structures

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. D. Burton ◽  
C. P. Baker ◽  
J. Y. Lew
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Flexible Structures ◽  
Rigid Body Motion ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Flexible Beam ◽  
Test Bed ◽  
Ode Models ◽  
Hydraulically Actuated ◽  
Pressure Dynamics ◽  
Low Order

Abstract The maneuvering and motion control of large flexible structures are often performed hydraulically. The pressure dynamics of the hydraulic subsystem and the rigid body and vibrational dynamics of the structure are fully coupled. The hydraulic subsystem pressure dynamics are strongly nonlinear, with the servovalve opening x(t) providing a parametric excitation. The rigid body and/or flexible body motions may be nonlinear as well. In order to obtain accurate ODE models of the pressure dynamics, hydraulic fluid compressibility must generally be taken into account, and this results in system ODE models which can be very stiff (even if a low order Galerkin-vibration model is used). In addition, the dependence of the pressure derivatives on the square root of pressure results in a “faster than exponential” behavior as certain limiting pressure values are approached, and this may cause further problems in the numerics, including instability. The purpose of this paper is to present an efficient strategy for numerical simulation of the response of this type of system. The main results are the following: 1) If the system has no rigid body modes and is thus “self-centered,” that is, there exists an inherent stiffening effect which tends to push the motion to a stable static equilibrium, then linearized models of the pressure dynamics work well, even for relatively large pressure excursions. This result, enabling linear system theory to be used, appears of value for design and optimization work; 2) If the system possesses a rigid body mode and is thus “non-centered,” i.e., there is no stiffness element restraining rigid body motion, then typically linearization does not work. We have, however discovered an artifice which can be introduced into the ODE model to alleviate the stiffness/instability problems; 3) in some situations an incompressible model can be used effectively to simulate quasi-steady pressure fluctuations (with care!). In addition to the aforementioned simulation aspects, we will present comparisons of the theoretical behavior with experimental histories of pressures, rigid body motion, and vibrational motion measured for the Battelle dynamics/controls test bed system: a hydraulically actuated system consisting of a long flexible beam with end mass, mounted on a hub which is rotated hydraulically. The low order ODE models predict most aspects of behavior accurately.

Structures of the Phosphazenes [ClC(NPCl3)2]+PCl6 − and [CH3C(NPCl3)2]+SbCl6 − at 90 K

1997 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 953-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Belaj
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Rigid Body Motion ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Torsion Angles ◽  
Ionic Compounds ◽  
Intramolecular Motions

The asymmetric units of both ionic compounds [N-(chloroformimidoyl)phosphorimidic trichloridato]trichlorophosphorus hexachlorophosphate, [ClC(NPCl3)2]+PCl^{-}_{6} (1), and [N-(acetimidoyl)phosphorimidic trichloridato]trichlorophosphorus hexachloroantimonate, [CH3C(NPCl3)2]+SbCl^{-}_{6} (2), contain two formula units with the atoms located on general positions. All the cations show cis–trans conformations with respect to their X—C—N—P torsion angles [X = Cl for (1), C for (2)], but quite different conformations with respect to their C—N—P—Cl torsion angles. Therefore, the two NPCl3 groups of a cation are inequivalent, even though they are equivalent in solution. The very flexible C—N—P angles ranging from 120.6 (3) to 140.9 (3)° can be attributed to the intramolecular Cl...Cl and Cl...N contacts. A widening of the C—N—P angles correlates with a shortening of the P—N distances. The rigid-body motion analysis shows that the non-rigid intramolecular motions in the cations cannot be explained by allowance for intramolecular torsion of the three rigid subunits about specific bonds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document